Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soil hydrology: Stages of development, current state, and nearest prospects

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In Memory of Aleksandr Mironovich Globus

Abstract

The main stages of the development of soil hydrology are described. These are: (1) the stage of classical hydrology based on the concepts of soil water forms and soil hydrological constants; (2) the stage of thermodynamic approaches toward assessing the statics and dynamics of soil water (soil hydrophysics); and (3) the modern stage of diverse approaches taking into account the specificity of water movement in a heterogeneous pore space (the development of preferential water flows), the specificity of the hydrological properties of soils in dependence on the scale of their examination, and the impact of the living soil phase on the soil hydrological processes. The diversity of modern approaches toward soil hydrology is reflected in the names of new branches of this science, such as hydropedology, geohydrology, biohydrology, etc. At the modern stage, all the conceptual approaches typical of the earlier stages of the development of soil hydrology are also applied. At present, soil hydrology is an actively developing field of soil science with clearly understood limits of application, advantages, and disadvantages of the methods typical of the first two stages. On this basis, an integral quantitative multilevel concept of soil hydrology is being developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Voronin, Fundamentals of Soil Physics (Izd. Mosk Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. M. Globus, Soil-Hydrological Substantiation of Agroecological Mathematical Models (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. M. Globus, Physics of the Nonisothermic Soil Water Exchange (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Globus, Experimental Hydrophysics of Soils (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. M. Goncharov and E. V. Shein, “Specificity of the Hydrological Regime of Soils in the Zones of Technological Ruts,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., No. 2, p. 35–39 (1991).

  6. E. A. Dmitriev, V. N. Shcheglov, and V. F. Basevich, “Morphology of Water Percolation Flows in Wet Soils and the Factors Controlling It,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., No. 1, p. 31–35 (1985).

  7. F. R. Zaidel’man, “Water Regime of Gleyed and Non-gleyed Heavy-Textured Soddy-Podzolic Soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 120–136 (1968).

  8. F. R. Zaidel’man, The Genesis and Ecological Conditions of Reclamation of Soils and Landscapes (KDU, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. R. Zaidel’man, Soil Reclamation (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. A. Nikolaeva, Ya. A. Pachepskii, R. A. Shcherbakov, et al., “Modeling of the Water Regime in an Ordinary Mycelium-Calcareous Chernozem,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 44–54 (1988).

  11. Ya. A. Pachepskii, Mathematical Models in Soil Reclamation (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. A. Poluektov, E. I. Smolyar, and V. V. Terleev, and A. G. Topazh, Models of Crop Production Processes (Izd. S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. I. Sudnitsyn, Movement of Soil Water and Water Consumption by Plants (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Theory and Methods of Soil Physics Ed. by E.V. Shein and L.O. Karpachevskii (Grif i K, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. B. Umarova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2009).

  16. A. B. Umarova and P. I. Kirdyashkin, “Convective Transfer of Dissolved Substances by Preferential Water Flows in Gray Forest Soils of the Vladimir Opolie,” Vestn. Orenb. Univ., No. 10 (2007).

  17. E. V. Shein, A Course of Soil Physics (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. V. Shein, I. I. Gudima, and A. V. Mokeichev, “Methods for Determining the Main Hydrophysical Functions for Modeling Purposes,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., no 2, p. 18–24 (1993).

  19. E. V. Shein, A. K. Guber, and N. S. Kukharuk, “Transport of Water and Substances along Macropores in a Soddy-Podzolic Soil,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., no 2, p. 22–32 (1995).

  20. E. V. Shein and K. A. Marchenko, “The Relationship between the Pathways of Water Movement and Spatial Distribution of Bulk Density in the Soils of the Vladimir Opol’e Region,” Pochvovedenie, No. 7, 823–833 (2001) [Eur. Soil Sci. 34 (7), 733-740 (2001)].

  21. V. M. Shestakov and S. P. Pozdnyakov, Hydrogeology (IKTs Akademkniga, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Bouma, “Hydropedology as a Powerful Tool for Environmental Policy Research,” Geoderma, Ñ. 275–280 (2006).

  23. J. Bouma, L. W. Dekker, and J. C. F. M. Haans, “Measurement of Depth to Water Table in a Heavy Clay Soil,” Soil Sci., p. 264–270 (1980).

  24. S. T. Brantley, A. F. White, D. Sparks, et al., Frontiers in Exploration on the Critical Zone: Report of a Workshop Sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Newark, DE, October 24–26 (2006).

  25. T. Gimmi, “Verlagerung Gelöster Stoffe Durch Den Boden Ins Grundwasser. Schriftenreihe Umwelt,” Bundesamt fur Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Bern, 349, 46 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. K. Guber, M. Tuller, M. A. Martin, et al., “Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity as Affected by the Macropore Continuity Inferred From CT Scan Data,” in Trans. Joint Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies in Houston. Texas, CD-publication (2008).

  27. C. M. Heppell, T. P. Burt, R. J. Williams, and A. H. Haria, “The Influence of Hydrological Pathways on the Transport of the Herbicide Isoproturon through an Underdrained Clay Soil,” Water Sci. Technol. 39, 77–84 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Horn, “Soil Water—Storage Potential, Accessibility and Flux as Key Functions for Land Use Planning at Various Scales—Do We Need a Paradigm Change?” in EUROSOIL. Book of Abstracts Ed. by H. W. Blum, H. Martin, et al., (Vienna, 2008), p. 41.

  29. N. J. Jarvis, C. D. Brown, and E. Granitza, “Sources of Error in Model Predictions of Pesticide Leaching: A Case Study Using the MACRO Model,” Agric. Water Management, 44, 247–262 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Nemes, D. Timlin, B. Quebedeaux, and Ya. A. Pachepsky, “Sensitivity of CEAP Cropland Simulations to the Parameterization of the Hydrology Module of the APEX Model,” in Trans. Joint Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies in Houston, Texas, CD-publication (2008).

  31. J. Simunek, O. Wendroth, N. Wypler, and M. T. van Genuchten, “Non-Equilibrium Water Flow Characterized by Means of Upward Infiltration Experiments,” Europ. J. Soil Sci. 52, 13–24 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Simunek, N. J. Jarvis, M. T. van Genuchten, and A. Gardenas, “Nonequilibrium and Preferential Flow and Transport in the Vadose Zone: Review and Case Study,” J. Hydrol. 272, 14–35 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Umarova, E. Shein, and I. Sokolova, “Subsoil Compaction, Structure Degradation under the Effect of Specific Water Regime in Soil Reclamation Constructions over a Period of 20 Years,” in EUROSOIL. Book of Abstracts Ed. by H. W. Blum, H. Martin, et al., (Vienna, 2008), p. 49.

  34. J. C. van Dam, J. Hyygen, J. G. Wesseling, et al., Theory of SWAP, Version 2.0. Simulation of Water Flow, Solute Transport and Plant Growth in the Soil-Water—Atmosphere—Plant Environment (Wageningen Univ., The Netherlands, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. T. van Genuchten, “A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. L. P. Wilding and H. Lin, “Advancing the Frontiers of Soil Science towards a Geoscience,” Geoderma 131, 257–274 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Soil Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia

    E. V. Shein

Authors
  1. E. V. Shein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Shein.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Shein, 2010, published in Pochvovedenie, 2010, No. 2, pp. 175–185.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shein, E.V. Soil hydrology: Stages of development, current state, and nearest prospects. Eurasian Soil Sc. 43, 158–167 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229310020055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229310020055

Keywords

Search

Navigation