Skip to main content
Log in

Solute movement in an intact soil core under different ponding heights

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contaminant transport to groundwater systems through the unsaturated zone follows, in most cases, preferential pathways. The understanding and assessment of this preferential flow mechanism is important to the prevention and solution of resulting problems. A column study was carried out where a NaCl-tracer solution (33 to 37 mmohs/cm of conductivity) was passed through an intact soil core under saturated conditions and three different ponding heights ranging from 5 to 30 mm. Outflow rates varied from 13 to 103 ml/min during the three tests performed. A subsequent dye tracing and slicing of the soil column was performed. Electrical conductivity measurements assessed indirectly the chloride content of the water outflow. Breakthrough curves (BTCs) showed short threshold times (less than 20% pore volume time) and asymmetry with respect to the point defined by C/Co = 0.5 and pore volume time. The BTCs successfully represent the flow measurements through the soil column, this fact is supported by the subsequent horizontal slicing (5 cm thick) of the intact core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. L. Anderson and J. Bouma, “Water Movement through Pedal Soils: I Saturated Flow,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 41 413–418(1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Andre, M. Sardin, P. Vitorge, and M. H. Faure, “Analysis of Breakthrough Curves of Np V in Clayey and Packed Column in Terms of Mass Transfer Kinetics,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 35, 161–173 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. Andreini and T. S. Steenhuis, “Preferential Paths of Flow under Conventional and Conservation Tillage,” Geoderma 46, 85–102 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. S. Ashraf, B. Izadi, and B. King, “Transport of Bromide under Intermittent and Continuous Ponding Conditions,” J. Environ. Qual. 26, 69–75 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Bejat, E. Perfect, V. L. Quisenberry, et al., “Solute Transport as Related to Soil Structure in Unsaturated Intact Soil Blocks,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 818–826 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Beven and P. Germann, “Macropores and Water Flow in Soils,” Water Resour. Rev. 18, 1311–1325 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Comegna, A. Coppola, A. Sommella, “Effectiveness of Equilibrium and Physical Nonequilibrium Approaches for Interpreting Solute Transport through Undisturbed Soil Columns,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 50, 121–138 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. De Marsily, Quantitative Hydrogeology (Academic Press, Orlando, 1986), 440 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Feyen, D. Jacques, A. Timmerman, J. Vanderborght, “Modeling Water Flow and Solute Transport in heterogeneous Soils: A Review of Recent Approaches,” J. Agric. Engng. Res. 70, 231–256 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Flury, J. Leuenberger, B. Studer, and H. Fluhler, “Transport of Anions and Herbicides in a Loamy and Sandy Field Soil,” Water Resour. Res. 31, 823–835 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Garrido, M. Ghodrati, M. Chendorain, and C. G. Campbell, “Small-Scale Variability in Solute Transport Processes in a Homogeneous Clay Loam Soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1513–1522 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Grindrod, M. S. Edwards, J. J. W. Higgo, and G. M. Williams, “Analysis of Colloid and Tracer Breakthrough Curves,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 21, 243–253 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Hill and Y. J. Parlange, “Wetting Front Instability in Layered Soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 697–702 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. K. Kamra, B. Lennartz, M. Th. van Genuchten, and P. Widmoser, “Evaluating Non-Equilibrium Solute Transport in Small Soil Columns,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 48, 189–212 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. J. S. Kung, “Preferential Flow in a Sandy Vadose Zone: I. Field Observation,” Geoderma 46, 51–58 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. J. S. Kung, E. J. Kladivko, T. J. Gish, et al., “Quantifying Preferential Flow by Breakthrough of Sequentially Applied Tracers: Silt Loam Soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 1296–1304 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Li and M. Ghodrati, “Preferential Transport of Nitrate through Soil Columns Containing Root Channels,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 653–659 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Li and M. Ghodrati, “Transport of Nitrate in Soils as Affected by Earthworm Activities,” J. Environ. Qual. 24, 432–438 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Ma and H. M. Selim, “Solute Transport in Soils under Conditions of Variable Flow Velocities,” Water Resour. Rev. 32, 3277–3283 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. L. Quisenberry, R. E. Phillips, and J. M. Zeleznik, “Spatial Distribution of Water and Chloride Macropore Flow in a Well-Saturated Soil,” 58, 1294–1300 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. S. Öztürk and I. Özkan, “Solute Movement in Large Soil Columns during Different Ponded Infiltration,” Aust. J. Agri. Res. 53, 183–189 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. L. Ren, B. Izadi, B. King, and E. Dowding, “Preferential Transport in Unsaturated Cores under Different Irrigation Methods,” Soil Sci. 161, 214–225 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. S. Seyfried and P. S. C. Rao, “Solute Transport in Undisturbed Columns of an Aggregated Tropical Soil: Preferential Flow Effects,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 1434–1444 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Simunek, N. J. Jarvis, M. Th. van Genuchten, and A. Gardenas, “Review and Comparison of Models for Describing Non-Equilibrium and Preferential Flow and Transport in the Vadose Zone,” J. Hydrol. 272, 14–35 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Vanderborght, C. Gonzales, M. Vanclooster, et al., “Effects of Soil Type and Water Flux on Solute Transport,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 372–389 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Vanderborght and H. Vereecken, “Analyses of Locally Measured Bromide Breakthrough Curves from a Natural Gradient Tracer Experiment at Krauthausen,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 48, 23–43 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Vanderborght and H. Vereecken, “Estimation of Local Scale Dispersion from Local Breakthrough Curves during a Tracer Test in a Heterogeneous Aquifer: the Lagrangian Approach,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 54, 141–171 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Vereecken, U. Jaekel, and H. Schwarze, “Analysis of Long-Term Behavior of Solute Transport with Nonlinear Equilibrium Sorption Using Breakthrough Curves and Temporal Moments,” J. Cont. Hydrol. 56, 271–294 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Wildenschild, K. H. Jensen, K. Villholth, and T. H. Illangasekare, “A Laboratory Analysis of the Effect of Macropores on Solute Transport,” Groundwater 32, 381–389 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Tonguç.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tonguç, F., Merdun, H. Solute movement in an intact soil core under different ponding heights. Eurasian Soil Sc. 42, 1497–1503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229309130109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229309130109

Keywords

Navigation