Skip to main content
Log in

Lessivage and its relation to the hydrological regime of soils

  • Genesis and Geography of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the examples of four typical catenas in the East European Plain, the role of lessivage in the development of automorphic and hydromorphic loamy and clayey soils with light-colored acid eluvial horizons and with different degrees of gleyzation has been studied. It is found that characteristic features of lessivage are often observed in the soils without hydrological barriers hampering or preventing the vertical migration of soil water and mass transfer processes. The hydrological barriers may be represented by the shallow horizons of temporarily perched water, or by the ascending capillary fringe of the ground water, or by the water-saturated horizons, in which the volume of free pores does not exceed 2–4%. It is shown that light-colored acid eluvial horizons may be formed in the profiles of loamy and clayey soils without any signs of lessivage. The development of strongly gleyed soils (gleyed soddy-podzolic soils and pseudogley soils (Stagnosols)) is not related to colmatage (silting of their illuvial horizons through lessivage); it is conditioned by the actual hydrological regime of these soils. The role of lessivage, podzolization, and gleyzation in the development of clay-differentiated soils is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. M. Abramova, Data for Characterizing Podzolic and Soddy-Podzolic Soils (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1961), pp. 209–258 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. P. Amalitskii, Gorbanovskii District: Data on Land Evaluation in the Nizhni Novgorod Province (St. Petersburg, 1888), Vol. 7 [in Russian].

  3. K. D. Glinka, Soil Science (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow, 1932) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Dokuchaev, “About Podzol,” Tr. Vol’n. Ekon. Obshch. 1(2), 142–150 (1880).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Dokuchaev, “On the Benefits of Studying Local Names of Russian Soils (1886),” Tr. Vol’n. Ekon. Obshch. 2(5), 116–118 (1887).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duchaufour, P., Précis de pedologie, Masson and Cie, Paris, 1965, 2nd ed.; Duchaufour, P., Lévolution des sols, Masson and Cie, Paris, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Zavalishin, “Some Observations Regarding the Knowledge of Soils with Shallow Gley Horizon,” in In Memory of Academician K. D. Glinka (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1928) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. R. Zaidel’man, “Diagnostics of Podzolic and Loess Pseudogley and Gleyic Podzolic Soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 130–140 (1973).

  9. F. R. Zaidel’man, Podzol and Gley Formation (Nauka, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. R. Zaidel’man, Hydrological Regime of Soils in the Nonchernozemic Zone (Gidrometizdat, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. R. Zaidel’man, Gley Formation and Its Role in Soil Formation (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. R. Zaidel’man, “Genesis and Problems of Classification of Soils with Light-Colored Acid Eluvial Horizons,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 233–242 (2002) [Eur. Soil Sci. 37 (2), 199–206 (2002)].

  13. N. N. Matinyan, Pedogenesis on Varved Clay of Glaciolacustrine Plains in the Northwestern Russia (St.-Petersburg, 2003) [in Russian].

  14. N. D. Ponagaibo, “Natural-Historical Conditions of the Mtsena Region,” in Proceedings of the Forest-Economic Expedition: the Mtsena Expedition (Moscow, 1929), Vol. 1, pp. 50–180, 211–227, 638–642 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Rode, “Podzolization and Lessivage,” Pochvovedenie, No. 7, 9–23 (1964).

  16. T. A. Sokolova, T. Ya. Dronova, and I. I. Tolpeshta, Clay Minerals in Soils (Grif, Tula, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. N. Sokolovskii, “Some Observations of Soil Colloids,” Russk. Pochvoved, Nos. 4–5, 14–15 (1922).

  18. V. D. Tonkonogov, Clay-Differentiated Soils of European Russia (Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

  19. V. M. Fridland, “Podzolization and Illimerization,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 27–38 (1958).

  20. N. Cernescu, “Facteurs de climat et zones de sol en Roumanie,” in Inst. Geol. Roumaniei. Stud. Techn. si Economice, Ser. C (Bucuresti, 1934), No. 2.

  21. Duchaufour, P., ’Lessivage et podsolisation,’ Rev. Forest. Fran’??c., No. 10, 652–674 (1951).

  22. R. Dudal, “Etude morphologique et génétique d’une séquence de sols sur limon loessique,” in Extrait de Agriculture (October, 1953).

  23. G. Krauss, Bodenart und Bodentyp, insbesondere Wasser-und Lufthaushalt der gleyartigen Bodenbildungen, Tharandt. Forstl. Yahrbuch. (1953).

  24. W. L. Kubiena, Bestimmungsbuch und Sistematik der Boden Europas (Stuttgart, 1953).

  25. E. Muckenhausen, “Le pseudogley,” Sci. Sol, No. 1, 21–29 (1963).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © F.R. Zaidel’man, 2007, published in Pochvovedenie, 2007, No. 2, pp. 133–144.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaidel’man, F.R. Lessivage and its relation to the hydrological regime of soils. Eurasian Soil Sc. 40, 115–125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229307020019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229307020019

Keywords

Navigation