Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetics of the respiratory response of the soil and rhizosphere microbial communities in a field experiment with an elevated concentration of atmospheric CO2

  • Soil Biology
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of an elevated concentration of atmospheric CO2 and the application rate of nitrogen fertilizers on the microbial biomass and maximum specific growth rate of microorganisms in the soil and rhizosphere was studied in a long-term field experiment involving the growing of sugar beets and winter wheat. It was shown that the treatment of field plots with carbon dioxide at a concentration higher than that in the atmosphere (550 ppm) for three-four years resulted in the formation of a microbial community with a higher maximum specific growth rate and a larger share of R-strategy microorganisms as compared to the soil under the control plants. No reliable differences in the total microbial biomass in the soil under the winter wheat were revealed between the treatments with the ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations; in the soil under the beet plants, a reliable increase in the total microbial biomass at the elevated CO2 concentration was noted only in the close vicinity of the plant roots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. V. Blagodatskaya, I. N. Bogomolova, and S. A. Blagodatskii, “Changes in Ecological Strategy of Soil Microbial Community upon Glucose Application,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 600–608 (2001) [Eur. Soil Sci. 34 (5), 530–537 (2001)].

  2. D. G. Zvyagintsev, Soils and Microorganisms (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. S. Panikov, M. V. Paleeva, S. N. Dedysh, and A. G. Dorofeev, “Kinetic Methods of Determining the Biomass and Activity of Different Groups of Soil Microorganisms,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 109–120 (1991).

  4. T.-H. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “Ratios of Microbial Biomass Carbon to Total Organic Carbon in Arable Soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 21, 471–479 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. H. Andrews and R. F. Harris, “R-and K-Selection and Microbial Ecology” Adv. Microb. Ecol. 9, 99–144 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. A. Bazzaz, “The Response of Natural Ecosystems to the Rising Global CO2 Levels,” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 167–196 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Blagodatsky, O. Heinemeyer, and J. Richter, “Estimating the Active and Total Soil Microbial Biomass by Kinetic Respiration Analysis,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 32(1), 73–81 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. H. Fitter, J. D. Graves, J. Wolfenden, et al., “Root Production and Turnover and Carbon Budgets of Two Contrasting Grasslands under Ambient and Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations,” New Phytol. 137, 247–255 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Hodge, E. Paterson, S. J. Grayston, et al., “Characterization and Microbial Utilization of Exudates Material from the Rhizosphere of Lolium perenne Grown under CO2 Enrichment,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 1033–1043 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Heinemeyer, H. Insam, E.-A. Kaiser, and G. Walenzik, “Soil Microbial Biomass and Respiration Measurements: An Automated Technique Based on Infra-Red Gas Analysis,” Plant Soil 116, 191–195 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. A. Hungate, J. Canadel, and F. S. Chapin III, “Plant Species Mediate Changes in Soil Microbial N in Response to Elevated CO2,” Ecology 77, 2505–2515 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. A. Hungate, F. S. Chapin, H. Zhong, et al., “Stimulation of Grassland Nitrogen Cycling under Carbon Dioxide Enrichment,” Oecologia 109, 149–153 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. W. Johnson, D. Geisinger, R. Walker, et al., “Soil pCO2, Soil Respiration, and Root Activity in CO2-Fumigated and Nitrogen-Fertilized Ponderosa Pine,” Plant Soil 165, 129–138 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Insam, E. Baath, M. Berreck, et al., “Responses of the Soil Microbiota to Elevated CO2 in an Artificial Tropical Ecosystem,” J. Microbiol. Methods 36, 45–54 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. A. Kimball, J. R. Mauney, F. S. Nakayama, and S. B. Idso, “Effects of Increasing CO2 on Vegetation,” Vegetation 104–105, 65–75 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Luo, R. B. Jackson, C. B. Field, and H. A. Mooney, “Elevated CO2 Increases Belowground Respiration in California Grasslands,” Oecologia 108, 130–137 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. M. Montealegre, C. van Kessel, M. P. Russele, and M. J. Sadowsky, “Changes in Microbial Activity and Composition in a Pasture Ecosystem Exposed to Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,” Plant Soil 243, 197–207 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. J. Norby, “Issues and Perspectives for Investigating Root Responses to Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,” Plant Soil 165, 9–20 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Paterson, E. A. S. Rattray, and K. Killham, “Effect to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration on C-Partitioning and Rhizosphere C-Flow for Three Plant Species,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 195–201 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K. S. Pregitzer, D. R. Zak, J. Maziasz, et al., “Fine Root Growth, Mortality, and Morphology in a Factorial Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Soil N Availability Experiment,” Ecol. Appl. 10, 18–33 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. J. Ross, K. R. Tate, and P. C. D. Newton, “Elevated CO2 and Temperature Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Ryegrass-White Clover Turves of an Endoaquept Soil,” Plant Soil 176, 37–49 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Rouhier, G. Billes, L. Billes, and P. Bottner, “Carbon Fluxes in the Rhizosphere of Sweet Chestnut Seedlings (Castanea sativa) Grown under Two Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations: 14C Partitioning after Pulse Labeling,” Plant Soil 180, 101–111 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. H. Van Ginkel, A. Gorissen, and J. A. Van Veen, “Carbon and Nitrogen Allocation in Lolium perenne in Response to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 with Emphasis on Soil Carbon Dynamics,” Plant Soil 188, 299–308 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.-J. Weigel and U. Danngen, “The Braunschweig Carbon Project: Atmospheric Flux Monitoring and Free Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE),” J. Appl. Bot. 74, 55–60 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. R. Zak, K. S. Pregitzer, P. S. Curtis, et al., “Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Feedback between Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles,” Plant Soil 151, 105–117 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. R. Zak, K. S. Pregitzer, J. S. King, and W. E. Holmes, “Elevated Atmospheric CO2, Fine Roots, and the Response of Soil Microorganisms: a Review and Hypothesis,” New Phytol. 147, 201–222 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.A. Blagodatsky, E.V. Blagodatskaya, T.-H. Anderson, H.-J. Weigel, 2006, published in Pochvovedenie, 2006, No. 3, pp. 325–333.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blagodatsky, S.A., Blagodatskaya, E.V., Anderson, T.H. et al. Kinetics of the respiratory response of the soil and rhizosphere microbial communities in a field experiment with an elevated concentration of atmospheric CO2 . Eurasian Soil Sc. 39, 290–297 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306030082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306030082

Keywords

Navigation