Skip to main content
Log in

Compact MIMO-Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for Ultra-Wide-Band and Ku-Band Applications

  • ANTENNA AND FEEDER SYSTEMS
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Compact U-shaped multiple-inputs and multiple-output (MIMO)-antenna with dimensions of 23 × 47 mm2 has been proposed for ultra-wide-band (UWB) portable-device applications and satellite communication applications operating over a 141% fractional bandwidth (3.1 to 18 GHz) at –10 dB impedance matching. The radiators are placed perpendicular (90 degrees) to each other to obtain low correlation (high isolation) between the ports. The characteristics of the antenna are studied on the basis of isolation, bandwidth, radiation patterns, envelope correlation coefficient, and diversity gain and total efficiency. Quad elements MIMO-structure has been considered for higher channel capacity operations. The simulation and measurement results are presented, and it shows that the impedance bandwidth is more than UWB range with high isolation and better diversity performance. It is found to be more suitable for portable-device applications and satellite communications when compared to the available designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. H. Winters, “On the capacity of radio communication systems with diversity in a Rayleigh fading environment,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 5, 871–878 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Alamouti, “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 16, 451–458 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. S. Kildal and K. Rosengren, “Correlation and capacity of MIMO systems and mutual coupling, radiation efficiency, and diversity gain of their antennas: ‘simulation and measurement in a reverberation chamber”, IEEE Commun. Mag. 12, 104–112 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Wang and B. Huang, “Design of ultra-wideband MIMO antenna for breast tumor detection,” Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2012, 1–7 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Mohammad, A. Nezhad, H. R. Hassani, and A. Foudazi, “A dual-band WLAN/UWB printed wide slot antenna for MIMO/diversity applications,” Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 55, 461–465 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Jusoh, M. F. Jamlos, M. R. Kamarudin, F. Malek, M. H. Mat, and M. A. Jamlos, “A novel compact tree-design antenna (NCTA) with a high gain enhancement for UWB application,” J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 25, 2474–2486 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.-M. Lee, K.-B. Kim, H.-K. Ryu, and J.-M. Woo, “A compact ultra-wideband MIMO antenna with WLAN band-rejected operation for mobile devices,” IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 11, 990–993 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Li, W.-X. Li, C. Liu, and T. Jiang, “Two UWB-MIMO antennas with high isolation using sleeve coupled stepped impedance resonators,” in Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP 2012), Singapore, Aug. 27–29, 2012 (APCAP 2012), pp. 21–22.

  9. L. Liu, S. W. Cheung, and T. I. Yuk, “Compact MIMO antenna for portable devices in UWB applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61, 4257–4264 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. P. Chacko, G. Augustin, and T. A. Denidni, “Uniplanar UWB antenna for diversity applications,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Soc. Int. Symp., 2012, (IEEE, New York, 2012), pp. 1–2.

  11. S. Zhang, B. K. Lau, A. Sunesson, and S. He, “Closely-packed UWB MIMO/ diversity antenna with different patterns and polarizations for USB dongle applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 60, 4372–4380 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Kang, Hui Li, Xinhuai Wang, and Xiaowei Shi, “Compact offset microstrip-fed MIMO antenna for band-notched UWB applications,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. 14, 1754–1757 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Gallo, E. A. Daviu, M. F. Bataller, et al., “A broadband pattern diversity annular slot antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60, 1596–1600 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. S. Khan, A. D. Capobianco, A. I. Najam, et al., “Compact ultra-wideband diversity antenna with a floating parasitic digitated decoupling structure,” IET Microwave Antennas Propag. 10, 743–753 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. K. Dhar, M. S. Sharawi, O. Hammi, and F. M. Ghannouchi, “An active integrated ultra-wideband MIMO antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63, 1–5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. A. Ibrahim, M. A. Abdalla, and Z. Hu, “Design of a compact Mimo antenna with asymmetric coplanar strip-fed for uwb applications,” Microwave Opt. Tech. Lett. 59, 31–36 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Syeda Irum Jafri, Rashid Saleem, Muhammad Farhan Shafique, and Anthony Keith Brown, “Compact reconfigurable multiple-input multiple- output antennae for ultra-wideband applications”, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, pp. 1–7.

  18. Tayyab Shabbir, Rashid Saleem and Muhammad Bilal, Muhammad Farhan Shafique, “UWB-MIMO Doublet with Split Decoupling Structure and Defected Grounds,” in Proc. 2017 IEEE MTT-S Int. Conf. Numerical Electromag. and Multiphys. Modeling and Optimiz. for RF, Microwave, and Terahertz Appl. (NEMO), Seville, Spain, May. 17–19, 2017 (IEEE. New York, 2017).

  19. Raj Kumar and Gopal Surushe, “Design of microstrip-fed printed UWB diversity antenna with tee crossed shaped structure,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. and Technol. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2015.10.006

  20. I. Nadeem and D. Choi, “Study on mutual coupling reduction technique for MIMO antennas,” IEEE Access, 7, 563–586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Toktas and A. Akdagli, “Compact multiple-input multiple-output antenna with low correlation for ultra-wideband applications,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 9, 822–829 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malviya, Leeladhar, Rajib Kumar Panigrahi, and M. V. Kartikeyan. “MIMO antennas with diversity and mutual coupling reduction techniques: a review.” Int. J. Microwave and Wireless Technol. 9, 1763–1780 (2017).

  23. S. Kareemulla and V. Kumar, “A novel compact MIMO antenna for ultra wideband applications,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Signal Proces., Inf., Commun. and Energy Systems (SPICES), Kozhikode, 2015 (IEEE, New York, 2015), pp. 1–5.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors are thankful to Prof. K.J. Vinoy, IISc Bangalore, India for providing valuable suggestions. VNA based measurements and anechoic chamber facility available at VIT Chennai campus have been used for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Kareemulla or V. Kumar.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kareemulla, S., Kumar, V. Compact MIMO-Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for Ultra-Wide-Band and Ku-Band Applications. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 67, 56–62 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922010053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226922010053

Keywords:

Navigation