Advertisement

Constructive stability and stabilizability of positive linear discrete-time switching systems

  • V. S. KozyakinEmail author
Mathematical Methods of Information Theory

Abstract

We describe a new class of positive linear discrete-time switching systems for which the problems of stability or stabilizability can be resolved constructively. The systems constituting this class can be treated as a natural generalization of systems with the so-called independently switching state vector components. Distinctive feature of such systems is that their components can be arbitrarily “re-connected” in parallel or in series without loss of the “constructive resolvability” property for the problems of stability or stabilizability of a system. It is shown also that, for such systems, the individual positive trajectories with the greatest or the lowest rate of convergence to the zero can be built constructively.

Keywords

switching systems stability stabilizability constructive criteria Hourglass alternative 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. F. Kleptsyn, V. S. Kozyakin, M. A. Krasnosel’skii, and N. A. Kuznetsov, “Stability of desynchronized systems,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 274, 1053–1056 (1984).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barabanov, “On the Lyapunov exponent of discrete inclusions. I,” Automat. Remote Control 49, 152–157 (1988).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. S. Kozyakin, “On the absolute stability of systems with asynchronously operating pulse elements,” Automat. Remote Control 51, 1349–1355 (1991).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Gurvits, “Stability of discrete linear inclusion,” Linear Algebra Appl. 231, 47–85 (1995).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Kozyakin, “A short introduction to asynchronous systems,” in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Difference Equations, Boca Raton, FL, 2004 (CRC, Boca Raton, 2004), pp. 153–165.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Shorten, F. Wirth, O. Mason, K. Wulff, and C. King, “Stability criteria for switched and hybrid systems,” SIAM Rev. 49, 545–592 (2007).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Lin and P. J. Antsaklis, “Stability and stabilizability of switched linear systems: a survey of recent results,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 54, 308–322 (2009).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Fornasini and M. E. Valcher, “Stability and stabilizability criteria for discrete-time positive switched systems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 57, 1208–1221 (2012).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.-C. Rota and G. Strang, “A note on the joint spectral radius,” Proc. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. A 63 = Indag. Math. 22, 379–381 (1960).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Theys, “Joint spectral radius: Theory and approximations,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Faculté des sciences appliquées, Département d’ingénierie mathématique, Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Univ. Catholique de Louvain (May 2005).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Jungers, “The joint spectral radius,” in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 385: Theory and Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Shen and J. Hu, “Stability of discrete-time switched homogeneous systems on cones and conewise homogeneous inclusions,” SIAM J. Control Optim. 50, 2216–2253 (2012).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Bochi and I. D. Morris, “Continuity properties of the lower spectral radius,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 110, 477–509 (2015).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Bousch and J. Mairesse, “Asymptotic height optimization for topical IFS, Tetris heaps, and the finiteness conjecture,” J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15, 77–111 (2002) (electronic).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. D. Blondel, J. Theys, and A. A. Vladimirov, “Switched systems that are periodically stable may be unstable,” in Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on Math. Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS), Notre-Dame, USA, Aug. 12—16, 2002 (Univ. Notre-Dame, 2002).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. Kozyakin, “A dynamical systems construction of a counterexample to the finiteness conjecture,” in Proc. 44th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, 2005 and 2005 Eur. Control Conf. CDCECC’05, 2005 (IEEE, New York, 2005), pp. 2338–2343.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Czornik and P. Jurgas, “Falseness of the finiteness property of the spectral subradius,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 17, 173–178 (2007).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. S. Kozyakin, “Algebraic unsolvability of a problem on the absolute stability of desynchronized systems,” Automat. Remote Control 51, 754–759 (1990).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. N. Tsitsiklis and V. D. Blondel, “The Lyapunov exponent and joint spectral radius of pairs of matrices are hard—when not impossible—to compute and to approximate,” Math. Control Signals Syst. 10, 31–40 (1997).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. D. Blondel and Y. Nesterov, “Polynomial-time computation of the joint spectral radius for some sets of nonnegative matrices,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 31, 865–876 (2009).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Nesterov and V. Y. Protasov, “Optimizing the spectral radius,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 34, 999–1013 (2013).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Kozyakin, “Hourglass alternative and the finiteness conjecture for the spectral characteristics of sets of nonnegative matrices,” Linear Algebra Appl. 489, 167–185 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Yu. Protasov, “Spectral simplex method,” Math. Program. Ser. A 156, 485–511 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd Edition, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. S. Golan, Semirings and Their Applications, (Kluwer, Academic, Dordrecht, 1999).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission ProblemsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Kotel’nikov Institute of Radio Engineering and ElectronicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations