Abstract
The apriorism in its “classical” understanding is analyzed, and the possible limitations of its application are determined. Newton and Mendeleev about the nature of scientific discoveries. Certain problems of philosophy and analytical history are solved by means of conceptual analysis. The structure, laws, and dynamics of social medium are investigated using the conceptual analysis of real pragmatics and history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Vollmer, Evolutionare Erkenntnistheorie (Hirzel, Stuttgart, 1975; Russk. Dvor, Moscow, 1998).
N. A. Kuznetsov, O. E. Baksanskii, and S. Yu. Zholkov, “From pragmatic knowledges to scientific theories. I,” Inf. Protsessy 13, 217–236 (2013).
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Architectonics of pragmatic theories. I,” Inf. protsessy (in press).
I. Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics that will be Able to Present Itself as a Science (Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester, 1953; Mysl’, Moscow, 1965).
I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Hackett, Indianapolis, 1996; Mysl’, Moscow, 1994).
N. A. Kuznetsov, O. E. Baksanskii, and S. Yu. Zholkov, “Sources and foundation of pragmatic knowledge,” Inf. Protsessy” 11, 428–447 (2011).
K. Lorenz, Die Ruckseite des Spiegels, Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens (Munchen-Zurich, 1973; Respublika, Moscow, 1998).
E. Lenneberg, Biologische Grundlagen der Sprache (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1972).
N. A. Kuznetsov, O. E. Baksanskii, and N. A. Grechishkina, “Origin of knowledge: source and foundation,” Inf. Protsessy 7(1), 72–92 (2007).
L. von Bertalanfy, “General theory of systems — survey of problems and results,” in Systemic Studies. Methodological problems. Yearbook (Nauka, Moscow, 1969), pp. 30–54 [in Russian].
L. von Bertalanffy, “An Essay on the Relativity of Categories,” Philosophy of Science, 22, 243–263 (1955).
W. V. O. Quine, “Epistemology naturalized,” in Proc. 14th Int. Cong. Philosophie, Vienna, Austria, Sept. 2–9, 1968 (Int. Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP), Vienna, 1968), Vol. 4, pp. 87–103.
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Mathematical Kant antinomies — not antinomies. Decision of problem,” NB: Filosof. Issled., No. 05 (Feb.), 166–211 (2013); http//e-notabene.ru/fr/article-516.html.
I. Kant, Works in 6 Volumes (Mysl’, Moscow, 1966), Vol. 6.
S. I. Vavilov, Isaak N’yuton, 1643–1727 (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].
T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962).
T. S. Kuhn, “Objectivity, value, judgment, and theory choice,” in T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977; Nauka, Moscow, 1994).
I. Lakatos, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1978; Medium, Moscow, 1995).
D. I. Mendeleev, Scientific Archives, Vol. 1: Periodic Law (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1953) [in Russian].
B. M. Kedrov, Day of One Great Opening. (SotsEkonLit, Moscow, 1958) [in Russian].
G. V. Smirnov, Mendeleev, Ser.: Life of Remarkable People (Molod. Gvardiya, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].
V. P. Kartsev, Newton, Ser.: Life of Remarkable People (Molod. Gvardiya, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].
R. S. Westfall, Never at Rest a Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982).
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Architectonics of pragmatic theories. II,” Inf. Protsessy (in press).
M. Klain, Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty MIR (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980; Mir, Moscow, 1984).
A. Einshtein, Collected Scientific Works in 4 Volumes, Vol. 1: Works on Theory of Relativity 1905–1920 (Nauka, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].
R. B. Laughlin, A Different Universe Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down (Basic Books, New York, 2005).
“What will be journal? From sitting of editorial board 28 feb. 2008,” Otech. Istorija, No. 5, 3–38 (2008).
M. Bloch, Apologie pour l’histoire ou Metier d’historien (Paris, 1949; Moscow, Nauka, 1986).
R. G. Collingwood, The Idea of History (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1956); R. G. Collingwood, An Autobiography (Oxford, 1939); The Idea of History. An Autobiography (Nauka, Moscow, 1980).
N. I. Konrad, Selected Works. History (Nauka, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].
K. Marks, and F. Engels Works, 2nd Ed. (GosPolitIzdat, Moscow, 1955), Vol. 21, p. 308.
I. D. Koval’chenko, Methods of Historical Study (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].
K. Marks, and F. Engels Works, 2nd Ed. (GosPolitIzdat, Moscow, 1955), Vol. 2.
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Pragmatic information interaction and analytic history. Exposition,” http://www.gubkin.ru/personal_sites/Zholkov/piv-ah/
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Conceptual analysis of Crimean war: mathematical test of military-political analysis,” http://www.gubkin.ru/personal_sites/Zholkov).
S. Yu. Zholkov, “On laws of society and history. I,” Alma-mater (Vestn. Yysshei Shkoly) No. 2, (2010).
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Fundamental results of Nikolai I governing,” http//www.gubkin.ru/personal_sites/Zholkov.
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Conceptual analysis of diplomacy problems and mathematical experience,” Dipl. Akad. MID SSSR, Kaf. Inf. i Upr., No. 2, 165–188 (2002).
E. V. Tarle, Crimean War (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1950), Vols 1–2.
S. V. Mironenko, Autocracy and Reforms. Political Struggle in Russia in Beginning of XIX Century (Nauka, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].
V. A. Lektorskii, Classic and Not Classic Epistemology (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].
E. Meier, Ursprung und Anfange des Christentums, Bd. 1–3 (Stuttgart, 1921–1923).
M. M. Speranskii, Projects and Notes (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Socio-Political Philosophy of M. Speranskii,” Tsennosti smysly, No. 1(10), 76–92 (2011).
O. F. von Bismark, Gedanken und Erinnerungen (Cotta, Stuttgart, 1924; ACT, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].
S. Yu. Zholkov, “Dialectics of society in context of conceptual analysis of real pragmatics of antithetic or antitopic,” Tsennosti Smysly, No. 2(18), 129–147 (2012).
I. Kant, Antropology from a Practic Point of View (Marfinus Nijhoff, the Hague, 1974; Mysl’, Moscow, 1966).
Yu. I. Semenov, Philosophy of History (Sovrem. tetradi, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian]; (http//mx.esc.ru/~assur/ocr/semenov).
Theory of Knowledge, Ed. by V. A. Lektorskii, and T. I. Oizerman (Mysl’, Moscow, 1995), Vol. 4 [in Russian].
N. Bounaparte, Maximes et Pensees du Prisonnier de Sainte-Helene. Manuscrit Trouve dans les Papiers de las Casas (Chez L’Huillier, Libraire, rue Serpente, No. 16, Paris, 1820; EKSMO, Moscow, 2003).
C. von Clausewitz, Vom Krieg: Hinterlassenes Werk (Verlag des Ministeriums fur Nationale Verteitigung, Berlin, 1957; ACT, St. Petersburg, 2002).
V. A. Uspenskii, “Forewarning for readers of’ New Literary Surveying’ to semiotic messages of Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov,” Novoe Lit. Obozren., No. 24, 3.2 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © N.A. Kuznetsov, O.E. Baksanskii, S.Yu. Zholkov, 2013, published in Informatsionnye Protsessy, 2013, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 306–335.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuznetsov, N.A., Baksanskii, O.E. & Zholkov, S.Y. From pragmatic knowledge to scientific theories: Part II. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 59, 661–680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226914060114
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226914060114