Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal log-polar image sampling

  • Theory and Methods of Signal Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to achieve better image compression simultaneously maintaining the high signal quality, the image sampling has become very important. Also, since the human eye sensitivity has circularly symmetric distribution, in recent years it is usual to apply log-polar image sampling. In this paper, we perform optimization of log-polar image sampling and show the significant improvement in comparison with the product log-polar sampling. Namely, for equal numbers of sensors optimal model gives higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) up to 2.5 dB, i.e., it is possible to decrease the number of required sensors by 45% for the same SNR. Furthermore, research shows that in optimal log-polar image sampling, the middle region of image, which is not sampled, can be made to be smaller than in the case of product sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding, Eds. H. R. Wu, K. R. Rao, in Marcel Dekker Series in Signal Processing and Communications (CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2005).

  2. A. Shortt, T. Naughton, and B. Javidi, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 1548 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Liu and A. C. Bovik, J. Visual Commun. Image Represent. 16, 643 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. F, Swaszek, IEEE Trans. Commun. 33, 518 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. W. Moo and D. L. Neuhoff, in Proc. 1998 IEEE Int. Symp. Information Theory (ISIT’98), Cambridge, USA, Aug. 16–21, 1998 (IEEE, New York, 1998), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Perić and M. Stefanović, AEU-Int. J. Electronics and Commun. 56, 345 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Shortt, T. Naughton, and B. Javidi, Opt. Express 14, 5129 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Metta, A. Gasteratos, and G. Sandini, Mechatronics 14, 989 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Boluda and F. Pardo, Electronic Imaging 14(1), 1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. M. Gomes and R. B. Fisher, in Proc. 19th Brazilian Symp. on Computer Graphics and Image Processing, Florianopolis, Oct. 16–18, 2001 (State Univ. Campinas, San Paulo, 2001), p. 338.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Yeung and N. Barnes, Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. (IJISTA) 1(1/2), 157 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Candes and J. Romberg, Inverse Probl. 23, 969 (2007).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Kh. Perich, A. Z. Iovanovich, M. Ch. Stufanovich, and S. M. Bogosavl’evich, Radiotekh. Elektron. (Moscow) 52, 1446 (2007) [J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 52, 1340 (2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Jayant and P. Noll, Digital Coding Of Waveforms: Principles and Applications to Speech and Video (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Gersho and R. M. Gray, Vector Quantization and Signal Compression (Kluwer Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published in Russian in Radiotekhnika i Elektronika, 2009, Vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 1474–1480.

The article was translated by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perić, Z., Dinčić, M. & Jovanović, A. Optimal log-polar image sampling. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 54, 1397–1402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226909120092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226909120092

Keywords

Navigation