Abstract
Machine learning methods were used to construct a demultiplexer for helical wave front separation into orthogonal modes. The accuracy of wave front demultiplexing into eight modes at a signal-to-noise ratio of –3 dB is about 95% in a broad range of signal carrier frequencies. For nonstationary parameters of signals, the proposed demultiplexer accuracy exceeds that of the classical correlation method.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
L. Li, R. Zhang, Z. Zhao, G. Xie, P. Liao, K. Pang, H. Song, C. Liu, Y. Ren, G. Labroille, P. Jian, D. Staro-dubov, B. Lynn, R. Bock, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Sci. Rep. 7, 17427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17580-y
B. T. Hefner and P. L. Marston, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3313 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428184
C. Shi, M. Dubois, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 7250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704450114
I. B. Djordjevic, IEEE Access 5, 16416 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2735994
S. I. Nikolenko, A. A. Kadurin, and E. O. Arkhangel’skaya, Deep Learning (Piter, St. Petersburg, 2018) [in Russian].
A. Agarap, arXiv:1803.08375 (2018).
F. Chollet, Deep Learning with Python (Manning, New York, 2017; Piter, St. Petersburg, 2018).
D. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
K. Basterretxea, J. M. Tarela, and I. del Campo, IEE Proc. Circ. Dev. Syst. 151, 18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-cds:20030607
H. Gabbard, M. Williams, F. Hayes, and C. Messenger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.141103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by P. Pozdeev
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stankevich, D.A. A Method of Helical Wave Front Demultiplexing. Tech. Phys. Lett. 45, 126–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785019020330
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785019020330