Abstract
The results of a numerical solution of the problem of supersonic flow past a blunt fin mounted on a plate with a developing boundary layer are presented. Generally, the case considered corresponds to the flow configuration used in the experimental and computational study by Tutty et al. (2013), in which the laminar air flow with the freestream Mach number of 6.7 is considered. The simulation was performed for different values of Reynolds number ranging from 5.0 × 103 to 2.0 × 104. Two stable solutions corresponding to metastable flow states with different configurations of the vortex structure were predicted within some range of Reynolds number. The bifurcation diagrams showing the main horseshoe vortex center location and the length of separation region versus the Reynolds number is presented, critical Reynolds number corresponding to occurrence of the second isolated solution is evaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
D. M. Voitenko, A. I. Zubkov, and Yu. A. Panov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhid. Gas., No. 1, 121 (1966).
V. S. Aduevskii and K. I. Medvedev, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhid. Gas., No. 1, 25 (1967).
B. Lakshmanan and S. N. Tiwari, J. Aircr. 31 (1), 64 (1994).
O. R. Tutty, G. T. Roberts, and P. H. Schuricht, J. Fluid Mech. 737, 19 (2013).
Y. Q. Zhuang and X. Y. Lu, Procedia Eng. 126, 134 (2015).
M. Mortazavi and D. Knight, “Shock wave laminar boundary layer interaction at a hypersonic flow over a blunt fin-plate junction,” in Proc. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas, January 9–13, 2017, AIAA 2017-0536. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0536
M. Mortazavi and D. Knight, AIAA J. 57 (8), 3506 (2019).
S. A. Lindörfer, C. S. Combs, P. A. Kreth, R. B. Bond, and J. D. Schmisseur, Shock Waves 30 (4), 395 (2020).
V. Borovoy, V. Mosharov, V. Radchenko, and A. Skuratov, “The shock-waves interference in the flow around a cylinder mounted on a blunted plate,” in Proc. 7th Eur. Conf. for Aeronautics and Aerospace Sciences, Milan, Italy, July 3–6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13009/EUCASS2017-63
N. T. Clemens and V. Narayanaswamy, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46 (1), 469 (2014).
C. S. Combs, E. L. Lash, P. A. Kreth, and J. D. Schmisseur, AIAA J. 56 (4), 1588 (2018).
E. V. Kolesnik, E. M. Smirnov, and A. A. Smirnovsky, Nauchno-Tekh. Vedom. St. Petersburg. Gos. Politekh. Univ., Fiz.-Mat. Nauki 12 (2), 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18721/JPM.12201
E. V. Kolesnik and A. A. Smirnovsky, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1400, 077030 (2019).
E. V. Kolesnik and E. M. Smirnov, Tech. Phys. 65 (2), 174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784220020115
E. V. Kolesnik, A. A. Smirnovsky, and E. M. Smirnov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 46, 579 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785020060206
R. H. Korkegi, AIAA J. 9 (5), 771 (1971).
A. I. Guzhavin and Ya. P. Korobov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhid. Gas., No. 2, 116 (1984).
I. V. Kolin, V. G. Markov, T. I. Trifonova, and D. V. Shukhovtsov, Tech. Phys. 49 (2), 263 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1648967
A. N. Kudryavtsev and D. B Epstein, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhid. Gas., No. 3, 122 (2012).
S. V.Guvernyuk, A. F. Zubkov, M. M. Simonenko, and A. I. Shvets, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Zhid. Gas., No. 4, 136 (2014).
Y.-Ch. Hu, W.-F. Zhou, G. Wang, Y.-G. Yang, and Zh.-G. Tang, Phys. Fluids 32 (11), 113601 (2020).
M. S. Liou and C. J. Steffen, J. Comput. Phys. 107 (1), 23 (1993).
C. Le Touze, A. Murrone, and H. Guillard, J. Comput. Phys. 284, 389 (2015).
P. A. Bakhvalov and T. K. Kozubskaya, Math. Models Comput. Simul. 8, 625 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048216060053
A. Harten, J. Comput. Phys. 49 (3), 357 (1983).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The calculations were performed using resources of the supercomputer center at Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (http://www.scc.spbstu.ru).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by N. Podymova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolesnik, E.V., Smirnov, E.M. Supersonic Laminar Flow Past a Blunt Fin: Duality of the Numerical Solution. Tech. Phys. 66, 741–748 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784221050133
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784221050133