Skip to main content
Log in

Viability of Different Types of Cells Cultivated on the Surface of Medical Electret

  • PHYSICAL APPROACHES AND PROBLEMS OF DATA INTERPRETATION IN THE LIFE SCIENCES
  • Published:
Technical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the electric field of a medical electret on the basis of tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) on the viability of human fibroblasts, multipotent mesenchymal stromal bone marrow cells, osteocytes, and chondrocytes cultivated on the surface of tantalum orthopedic implants with an electret coating was studied in vitro. Using the methods of photocolorimetic analysis and scanning electron microscopy, difference in the metabolic activity and cell morphology, in the character of the cell attachment to the implants and distribution by their surface, associated with the value and character of the electric charge distribution on the surface of these implants and the type of cellular test systems, were detected. Unclear mechanisms of the effect of the electric field of medical electrets on the functional activity of different types of the organism cell and tissues dictate the need for further experimental developments and fundamental studies in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. V. Makarevich, L. S. Pinchuk, and V. A. Gol’dade, Electric Fields and Electroactive Materials in Biology and Medicine (Inst. Mekh. Metallopolim. Sist., Gomel, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ya. Z. Grinberg, Inzh. Vestn. Dona, No. 4/2 (2014). http://ivdon.ru/uploads/article/pdf/12_grinberg.pdf_132a9182db.pdf.

  3. A. R. Blythe, T. Blythe, and D. Bloor, Electrical Properties of Polymers (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Electrets, Ed. by G. M. Sessler (Springer, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Eguchi, Philos. Mag. 49, 178 (1925).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. F. Galikhanov and R. Ya. Deberdeev, Vestn. Kazan. Tekhnol. Univ., No. 4, 45 (2010).

  7. E. T. Kulin, Bioelectret Effect (Nauka i Tekhnika, Minsk, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. T. Kulin, Med. Nov., No. 10, 34 (1996).

  9. E. A. Tsvetkova and V. A. Gol’dade, Probl. Fiz., Mat. Tekh., No. 1 (10), 51 (2012).

  10. E. Fukada, T. Takamatsu, and I. Yasuda, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 14, 2079 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. J. Ficat, G. Escourrou, M. J. Fauran, et al., Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Applications of Ferroelectrics, Gaithersburg, United States, 1983.

  12. H.-L. Graf, W. D. Stark, and D. R. Geiss, Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Electrets, Heidelberg, Germany, 1985, p. 813.

  13. J. Hua and G. En-tan, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100, 1075 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. F. Valentini, A. M. Sabatini, P. Dario, and P. Aebischer, Brain Res. 480, 300 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evolution of Osteosynthesis. Collection of Research Papers, Ed. by A. I. Gritsanov and V. P. Khomutov (MORSAR AV, St. Petersburg, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Kopyshev, The Use of Electrets in Medicine (ELMET, St. Petersburg, 2006). https://www.argo-shop.com.ua/library-6077.html.

  17. V. S. Rudnev, M. A. Medkov, K. N. Kilin, A. Yu. Ustinov, M. V. Belobeletskaya, N. I. Steblevskaya, I. N. Mutylina, and T. O. Zherebtsov, Prot. Met. Phys. Chem. Surf. 49, 717 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. A. Linnik, V. P. Khomutov, and M. S. Morgunov, Russ. Med. Zh., No. 20, 1 (2017).

  19. M. Fishman, M. Knyazhanskaya, A. Nemets, and A. Tsun, Al’m. Klin. Med. 45, 234 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. P. Khomutov and V. L. Laska, Peterb. Zh. Elektron., No. 2 (15), 3 (1997).

  21. S. A. Makohliso, R. F. Valentini, J. E. West, and P. Aebischer, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Electrets, Berlin, Germany, 1991, p. 712.

  22. T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. A. Plumb, in Cancer Cell Culture. Methods and Protocols, Ed. by S. P. Langdon (Humana, Totowa, 2003), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Supino, in In Vitro Toxicity Testing Protocols, Ed. by S. O’Hare and C. K. Atterwill (Humana, Totowa, 1995), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. I. Aleksandrova.

Additional information

Translated by A. Barkhash

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aleksandrova, O.I., Aleksandrova, S.A., Khomutov, V.P. et al. Viability of Different Types of Cells Cultivated on the Surface of Medical Electret. Tech. Phys. 63, 1304–1310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784218090037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784218090037

Keywords

Navigation