Physics of the Solid State

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 93–97 | Cite as

Experimental and numerical analysis of the high-speed deformation and erosion damage of the titanium alloy VT-6

  • Yu. V. Petrov
  • A. M. Bragov
  • N. A. Kazarinov
  • A. D. Evstifeev
Mechanical Properties, Physics of Strength, and Plasticity
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The temporal characteristics of the dynamic fracture of the titanium alloy VT-6 have been investigated under high-speed loading conditions. A relationship has been established between the process of dynamic tension of the specimen according to the Kolsky method and the surface erosion damage. A numerical analysis of the experimental data has been carried out. The method of erosion loading has been further developed as a tool for the dynamic testing of strength properties of materials.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Kolsky, Proc. Phys. Soc., London, Sect. B 62, 676 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. M. Bragov and A. K. Lomunov, Int. J. Impact Eng. 16, 321 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. E. Goodwin, W. Sage, and G. P. Tilly, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 184, 279, (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Kazarinov, A. D. Evstifeev, Yu. V. Petrov, and V. A. Lashkov, Dokl. Phys. 61 (5), 232 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. V. Petrov and V. I. Smirnov, Tech. Phys. 55 (2), 230 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Berezkin, S. I. Krivosheev, Yu. V. Petrov, and A. A. Utkin, Dokl. Phys. 45 (11), 617 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. A. Bratov, A. A. Gruzdkov, S. I. Krivosheev, and Yu. V. Petrov, Dokl. Phys. 49 (5), 338 (2004).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Valiev, Nat. Mater. 3, 511 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q. Wei, Acta Mater. 54, 4079 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Nicholas, Exp. Mech. 21, 177 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. A. Lashkov, Inzh.-Fiz. Zh. 60, 197 (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. F. Morozov and Y. V. Petrov, Dynamics of Fracture (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. V. Petrov and N. F. Morozov, ASME J. Appl. Mech. 61, 710 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu. V. Petrov and V. I. Smirnov, Dokl. Phys. 52 (10), 574 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu. V. Kolesnikov and E. M. Morozov, Contact Fracture Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow, 1989), p. 219 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985; Nauka, Moscow, 1989), p.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. A. Gorbushin, G. A. Volkov, and Yu. V. Petrov, Tech. Phys. 58 (3), 388 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Petrov
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. M. Bragov
    • 3
  • N. A. Kazarinov
    • 2
  • A. D. Evstifeev
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Problems of Mechanical EngineeringRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Research Institute for MechanicsLobachevsky State University of Nizhny NovgorodNizhny NovgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations