Skip to main content
Log in

Poisson Brackets Symmetry from the Pentagon-Wheel Cocycle in the Graph Complex

  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kontsevich designed a scheme to generate infinitesimal symmetries \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = \mathcal{Q}(\mathcal{P})\) of Poisson brackets \(\mathcal{P}\) on all affine manifolds \({{M}^{r}};\) every such deformation is encoded by oriented graphs on \(n + 2\) vertices and \(2n\) edges. In particular, these symmetries can be obtained by orienting sums of non-oriented graphs γ on n vertices and \(2n - 2\) edges. The bi-vector flow \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = {{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}(\gamma )(\mathcal{P})\) preserves the space of Poisson structures if γ is a cocycle with respect to the vertex-expanding differential d in the graph complex. A class of such cocycles \({{\gamma }_{{2\ell + 1}}}\) is known to exist: marked by \(\ell \in \mathbb{N},\) each of them contains a \((2\ell + 1)\)-gon wheel with a nonzero coefficient. At \(\ell = 1\) the tetrahedron \({{\gamma }_{3}}\) itself is a cocycle; at \(\ell = 2\) the Kontsevich–Willwacher pentagon-wheel cocycle \({{\gamma }_{5}}\) consists of two graphs. We reconstruct the symmetry \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P}) = {{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}({{\gamma }_{5}})(\mathcal{P})\) and verify that \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}\) is a Poisson cocycle indeed: \(\left[\kern-0.15em\left[ {\mathcal{P},{{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P})} \right]\kern-0.15em\right] \doteq 0\) via \(\left[\kern-0.15em\left[ {\mathcal{P},\mathcal{P}} \right]\kern-0.15em\right] = 0.\)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The dilation \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = \mathcal{P}\) is an example of symmetry for Jacobi identity; we study nonlinear flows \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = \mathcal{Q}(\mathcal{P})\) which are universal w.r.t. all affine manifolds and should persist under the quantization \(\tfrac{\hbar }{i}{{\{ \cdot , \cdot \} }_{\mathcal{P}}} \mapsto [ \cdot , \cdot ].\)

  2. In earnest, graphs with valency \(1\) of an end of \(E\) cancel out in the action of this differential d, cf. [4, 8].

  3. One proves that d(zero graph) \( = \) sum of zero graphs and graphs with zero coefficients.

  4. The present paper is aimed to help us reveal the general formula of the morphism \({{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}\) which connects the two graph complexes.

  5. The algorithm from [5] produces 41031 Leibniz graphs in \(\nu = 3\) iterations and 56509 at \(\nu \,\, \geqslant \,\,7.\)

  6. This is done because it is anticipated that, counting the number of ways to obtain a given bi-vector while orienting the nonzero cocycle \({{\gamma }_{5}},\) none of the coefficients in a solution \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}\) vanishes.

  7. The formula of degree-six differential polynomial \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P})(f,g)\) is given in App. A in the namesake arXiv:1712.05259. The encoding of \(8691\) Leibniz tri-vector graphs containing the Jacobiator \(\left[\kern-0.15em\left[ {\mathcal{P},\mathcal{P}} \right]\kern-0.15em\right]\) for the Poisson structure \(\mathcal{P}\) that occur in the r.‑h.s. \(\Diamond(\mathcal{P},\left[\!\left[ \mathcal{P},\mathcal{P} \right]\!\right])\) is available at https://rburing.nl/Q5d5.txt. The format to encode such graphs (with one tri-valent Jacobiator vertex) is explained in [5] (see also [1, 3]).

  8. The actually found \({{\partial }_{\mathcal{P}}}\)-cocycle \(\mathcal{Q}\) might differ from the value \({{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}(\gamma )\) by \({{\partial }_{\mathcal{P}}}\)-trivial or improper terms, i.e. \(\mathcal{Q} = {{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}(\gamma ) + {{\partial }_{\mathcal{P}}}(X) + \nabla (\mathcal{P},\left[\kern-0.15em\left[ {\mathcal{P},\mathcal{P}} \right]\kern-0.15em\right])\) for some vector field \(X\) realized by Kontsevich graphs and for some “Leibniz” bi-vector graphs \(\nabla \) vanishing identically at every Poisson structure \(\mathcal{P}.\)

  9. As soon as the expression of 167 Kontsevich graph coefficients in \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}\) via the \(91\) integer parameters was obtained, the linear system in factorization \(\left[\!\left[ \mathcal{P},{{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P}) \right]\!\right]=\Diamond(\mathcal{P},\left[\!\left[ \mathcal{P},\mathcal{P} \right]\!\right])\) for the pentagon-wheel flow \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = {{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P})\) was solved independently by A. Steel (Sydney) using the Markowitz pivoting run in Magma. The flow components \({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}\) of all the known solutions \(({{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}},{{\Diamond}_{5}})\) match identically. (For the flow \(\dot {\mathcal{P}} = {{\mathcal{Q}}_{5}}(\mathcal{P}) = {{\text{O}\vec{\text{r}}}}({{\gamma }_{5}})(\mathcal{P}),\) uniqueness is not claimed for the operator \(\Diamond\) in the r.-h.s. of the factorization.)

REFERENCES

  1. A. Bouisaghouane, R. Buring, and A. Kiselev, “The Kontsevich tetrahedral flow revisited,” J. Geom. Phys. 119, 272–285 (2017).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Buring and A. V. Kiselev, “On the Kontsevich \( \star \)‑product associativity mechanism,” PEPAN Lett. 14, 403–407 (2017).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Buring and A. V. Kiselev, “Software modules and computer-assisted proof schemes in the Kontsevich deformation quantization,” Preprint IHES/M/17/05 (2017).

  4. R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev, and N. J. Rutten, “The heptagon-wheel cocycle in the Kontsevich graph complex,” J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 24, 157–173 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Buring, A. V. Kiselev, and N. J. Rutten, “Infinitesimal deformations of Poisson bi-vectors using the Kontsevich graph calculus,” Proc. of Conf. ISQS’25 (Prague, 2017); J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 965, Paper 012010, 1–12 (2018). arXiv:1710.02405.

  6. V. A. Dolgushev, C. L. Rogers, and T. H. Willwacher, “Kontsevich’s graph complex, GRT, and the deformation complex of the sheaf of polyvector fields,” Ann. Math. 182, 855–943 (2015);

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Willwacher and M. Živković, “Multiple edges in M. Kontsevich’s graph complexes and computations of the dimensions and Euler characteristics,” Adv. Math. 272, 553–578 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kontsevich, “Formality conjecture,” Proc. of Conf. “Deformation theory and symplectic geometry” (Ascona, 1996), Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1997, pp. 139–156; M. Kontsevich, “Derived Grothendieck–Teichmüller group and graph complexes [after T. Willwacher],” Séminaire Bourbaki (69ème année), No. 1126, 1–26 (2017).

  9. A. Khoroshkin, T. Willwacher, and M. Živković, “Differentials on graph complexes,” Adv. Math. 307, 1184–1214 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. T. M. Willwacher, “Kontsevich’s graph complex and the Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra,” Invent. Math. 200, 671–760 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to R. Buring or A. V. Kiselev.

Additional information

1The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buring, R., Kiselev, A.V. & Rutten, N.J. Poisson Brackets Symmetry from the Pentagon-Wheel Cocycle in the Graph Complex. Phys. Part. Nuclei 49, 924–928 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779618050118

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779618050118

Keywords

Navigation