Abstract
The energy distribution of one electron and angular correlation parameter of two electrons in the two-neutrino double beta-decay of 100Мо have been calculated with the consideration of the contribution of excited 1+-states of the intermediate nucleus 100Тс. Two variants of signs of individual particular excited state contributions to the 2ν2β-transition amplitude are considered. The data of the experiment on the charge-exchange reaction 100Mo(3He, t)100Tc are used in the calculations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. S. Barabash, Nucl. Phys. A, 935, 52 (2015).
V. I. Tretyak and Yu. G. Zdesenko, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables, 80, 83 (2002).
Yu. M. Gavrilyuk, A. M. Gangapshev, V. V. Kazarov, V. V. Kuzminov, S. I. Panasenko, and S. S. Ratkevich, Phys. Rev. C, 87, 035501 (2013)
M. Doi, T. Kotani, and E. Takasugi, Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 83, 1 (1985)
A. Faessler and F. Šimkovic, J. Phys. G., 24, 2139 (1998).
T. Tomoda, Rep. Progr. Phys., 54, 53 (1991).
R. Arnold R., G. Augier, A. M. Bakalyarov, J. Baker, A. Barabash, Ph. Bernaudin, M. Bouchel, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, J. Cailleret, J. E. Campagne, D. Dasié, V. Egorov, K. Errahmane,A. I. Etienvre, et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, 536, 79 (2005).
R. Arnold R., G. Augier, J. Baker, A. S. Barabash, A. Basharina-Freshville, M. Bongrand, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, C. Cebrián, A. Chapon, E. Chauveau, Th. Dafni, F. F. Doppisch, H. Diaz, D. Durand, et al., Eur. Phys. J. C., 70, 927 (2010).
R. Arnold, C. Augier, J. Baker, A. Barabash, G. Broudin, V. Brudanin, A. J. Caffrey, V. Caurier, V. Egorov, K. Errahmane, A. I. Etienvre, J. L. Guyonnet, F. Hubert, C. Jollet, S. Jullian, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 182302 (2005).
S. V. Semenov, Phys. Part. Nucl., 48, 1018 (2017).
S. K. L. Sjue, D. Melconian, A. Garcia, I. Ahmad, A. Algora, J. Äystö, V.-V. Elomaa, T. Eronen, J. Hakala, S. Hoedl, A. Kankainen, T. Kessler, I. D. Moore, F. Naab, H. Pentilä, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 70, 064317 (2008).
J. Abad, A. Morales, R. Nunez-Lagos, A. F. Pacheco, An. Fiz. A, 80, 15 (1984).
O. Civatarese and J. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C, 58, 1535 (1998).
F. Šimkovic, P. Domin, S. V. Semenov, J. Phys., 27, 2233 (2001).
S. V. Semenov, F. Šimkovic, V. V. Khruschev, P. Domin, Phys. At. Nucl., 63, 1196 (2000).
Yu. A. Shitov, Phys. At. Nucl., 69, 2090 (2006).
J. M. Watson, W. Pairsuwan, B. D. Anderson, A. R. Baldwin, B. S. Flanders, R. Madey, R. J. McCarthy, B. A. Braun, B. H. Wildenthal, C. C. Foster, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 1369 (1985).
S. V. Semenov, AIP Conf. Proc., 942, 67 (2007);
A. Ya. Balysh, V. V. Khruschov, V. P. Labozin, S. V. Semenov, G. O. Tsvetkov, in Proceedings of the III International Conference on Current Problems in Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 7–10, 2010, 414.
J. H. Thies, T. Adachi, M. Dozono, H. Ejiri, D. Frekers, H. Fujita, Y. Fujita, M. Fujivara, E.-W. Grewe, K. Hatanaka, P. Heinrichs, D. Ishikawa, N. T. Khai, A. Lennarz, H. Matzubara et al., Phys. Rev. C, 86, 044309 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by E. Smirnova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semenov, S.V. Differential Intensities of the 2ν2β-Transition in 100Мо. Phys. Part. Nuclei 49, 698–700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779618040470
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779618040470