Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Models of Nucleus–Nucleus Interactions Implemented in CORSIKA

  • Elementary Particles and Fields/Experiment
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four most widely used models of hadronic interactions at high energies implemented in CORSIKA program were compared basing on the simulation of the first nucleus–nucleus interactions of cosmic rays with the atmosphere. For this comparison the distributions of the number of produced particles of different types were obtained, as long as the mean values of these numbers. The dependences of the fraction of the collision energy carried by different secondary particles on the mass of the primary particle were calculated for each model. The check of the electric charge conservation law implementation was performed. Comparison shows vast differences between the models in some cases that may result in different interpretation of experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. Heck, J. Knapp, J. N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz, and T. Thouw, CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo Code to Simulate Extensive Air Showers, FZKA 6019 (Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Werner, F.-M. Liu, and T. Pierog, Phys. Rev. C 74, 044902 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Pierog and K. Werner, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 196, 102 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Pierog, Iu. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. N. Kalmykov, S. S. Ostapchenko, and A. I. Pavlov, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. B 52, 17 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014018 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074009 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. S. Fletcher, T. K. Gaisser, P. Lipari, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 50, 5710 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Engel, T. K. Gaisser, P. Lipari, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5013 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. E.-J. Ahn, R. Engel, T. K. Gaisser, P. Lipari, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094003 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, arXiv: 1912.03300 [astro-ph].

  12. S. Roesler, R. Engel and J. Ranft, in Proceedings Monte Carlo 2000 Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 2000, Ed. by A. Kling et al. (Springer, Berlin, 2001), p. 1003; hep-ph/0012252.

  13. A. Fedynitch and R. Engel, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, Varenna, Italy, 2015, Ed. by F. Cerutti et al. (CERN, Geneva, 2015), p. 291.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. V. Nikolaenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolaenko, R.V., Bogdanov, A.G., Kokoulin, R.P. et al. Comparison of Models of Nucleus–Nucleus Interactions Implemented in CORSIKA. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 84, 1011–1016 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821130226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821130226

Navigation