Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptation of the Polynomial Chaos Method for the Uncertainty Analysis of Critical Experiments

  • Theoretical and Experimental Physics of Nuclear Reactors
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improvement of computational methods used for the uncertainty analysis of critical experiments allows the accuracy of the results to be more realistically estimated, which is important for further improvement of computational codes and cross section libraries used to justify nuclear safety of the research on uses of nuclear energy. Standard uncertainty estimation methods (Monte Carlo, sensitivity analysis, etc.) have disadvantages arising from considerably growing needs for computational resources to be used for nonlinear problems with a lot of measured parameters that contribute to the total uncertainty of a critical experiment. This has provoked increasing interest in spectral methods for uncertainty analysis, in particular, the polynomial chaos method. In this work, the necessity of the regression analysis is substantiated for approximations of random variables by the polynomial chaos method to estimate uncertainties and confidence levels of the results of critical experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, JCGM 100:2008.

  2. Uncertainty and Target Accuracy Assessment for Innovative Systems Using Recent Covariance Data Evaluations (OECD-NEA, 2008).

  3. R. G. Ghanem and P. D. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach (Dover, New York, 1991).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Winer, Am. J. Math. 60, 897 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Mathelin, M. Hussaini, and T. Zang, Numer. Algorithms 38, 209 (2005).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. M. R. Williams, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 155, 109 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. D. Fichtl, A. K. Prinja, and J. S. Warsa, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics, Computational Methods and Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, New York, May 3–7, 2009, LA-UR-09-01151.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Gilli, D. Lathouwers, J. L. Kloosterman, and T. H. J. J. van der Hagen, Ann. Nucl. Energy 40, 35 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Gilli, D. Lathouwers, J. L. Kloosterman, T. H. J. J. van der Hagen, A. J. Koning, and D. Rochman, Ann. Nucl. Energy 56, 71 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Navarro, J. Witteveen, and J. Blom, arXiv:1406.5483.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Kuzmin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Kuzmin, T.N. Korbut, 2017, published in Yadernaya Fizika i Inzhiniring, 2017, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 501–505.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuzmin, A.V., Korbut, T.N. Adaptation of the Polynomial Chaos Method for the Uncertainty Analysis of Critical Experiments. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 81, 1404–1407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778818100095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778818100095

Keywords

Navigation