Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp 942–951 | Cite as

Analysis of p 10B scattering within Glauber theory

  • E. T. Ibraeva
  • N. T. Burtebayev
  • P. M. Krassovitskiy
Proceedings of LXVI International Conference on Nuclear Spectroscopy and Atomic Nuclei Structure October 11–14, 2016, Sarov, Russia/Nuclei Theory


The differential cross sections for p 10B scattering are calculated at the energies of 197, 600, and 1000 MeV within Glauber theory. The contributions of single and double collisions are taken into account in the multiple-scattering operator. The contributions of proton collisions with nucleons belonging to various (1s, 1p) shells are estimated in the single-scattering cross sections. A comparison with experimental data and with the result of calculations in the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) at 197 MeV showed that the differential cross sections for p 10B scattering are adequately described in the region forward scattering angles.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. C. Pieper, K. Varga, and R. B. Wiringa, Phys. Rev. C 66, 044310 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. R. Pandharipande, Nucl. Phys. A 738, 66 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. N. Kuchera, G. V. Rogachev, V. Z. Goldberg, et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 054615 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. M. Lukyanov, A. S. Denikin, E. I. Voskoboynik, et al., arXiv: 1310.2965v3 [nucl-th].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Kanada-En’yo, H. Morita, and F. Kobayashi, arXiv:1504.02594v1 [nucl-th].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Myo, A. Umeya, H. Toki, and K. Ikeda, arXiv:1505.03942v1 [nucl-th].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. E. Warner, F. Carstoiu, J. A. Brown, et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 014605 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Crespo, E. Cravo, A. Deltuva, et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 014620 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahesh K. Sharma, R. N. Panda, Manoj K. Sharma, and S. K. Patra, arXiv:1307.2032 [nucl-th].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. C. Betker, S. Chang, E. J. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064607 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Amos, S. Karataglidis, and Y. J. Kim, Nucl. Phys. A 836, 59 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Cavanna, O. Palamara, R. Schiavilla, et al., arXiv:1501.01983v1 [nucl-ex].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. J. Glauber, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics (Interscience, New York, London, 1959), Vol. 1, p. 315.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. N. Boyarkina, The Structure of 1p-Shell Nuclei (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1973) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. A Zhusupov and E. T. Ibraeva, Phys. Part. Nucl. 31, 723 (2000).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Roy, H. S. Sherif, E. D. Cooper, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 442, 686 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. D. Alkhazov, S. L. Belostotskiĭ, A. A. Vorob’ev, et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 7 (1985).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. T. Ibraeva, M. A. Zhusupov, and O. Imambekov, Phys. At. Nucl. 74, 1595 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. T. Ibraeva, M. A. Zhusupov, and P. M. Krasovitskii, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 77, 433 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. T. Ibraeva
    • 1
  • N. T. Burtebayev
    • 1
  • P. M. Krassovitskiy
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Nuclear PhysicsNational Nuclear Center of Republic of KazakhstanAlmatyRepublic of Kazakhstan

Personalised recommendations