Skip to main content
Log in

Maximal design basis accident of fusion neutron source DEMO-TIN

  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When analyzing the safety of nuclear (including fusion) facilities, the maximal design basis accident at which the largest release of activity is expected must certainly be considered. Such an accident is usually the failure of cooling systems of the most thermally stressed components of a reactor (for a fusion facility, it is the divertor or the first wall). The analysis of safety of the ITER reactor and fusion power facilities (including hybrid fission–fusion facilities) shows that the initial event of such a design basis accident is a large-scale break of a pipe in the cooling system of divertor or the first wall outside the vacuum vessel of the facility. The greatest concern is caused by the possibility of hydrogen formation and the inrush of air into the vacuum chamber (VC) with the formation of a detonating mixture and a subsequent detonation explosion. To prevent such an explosion, the emergency forced termination of the fusion reaction, the mounting of shutoff valves in the cooling systems of the divertor and the first wall or blanket for reducing to a minimum the amount of water and air rushing into the VC, the injection of nitrogen or inert gas into the VC for decreasing the hydrogen and oxygen concentration, and other measures are recommended. Owing to a continuous feed-out of the molten-salt fuel mixture from the DEMO-TIN blanket with the removal period of 10 days, the radioactivity release at the accident will mainly be determined by tritium (up to 360 PBq). The activity of fission products in the facility will be up to 50 PBq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Kolbasov, C. Barnes, J. Blevins, H. Brunnader, A. Epifanov, C. Flanagan, H. Hosobuchi, H. Iida, C. van der Krogt, O. Kveton, D. Leger, D. Maisonnier, J. Perkins, and D. Robinson, ITER Plant Systems, ITER Documentation Series, No. 35 (IAEA, Vienna, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Taylor, D. Baker, S. Cattaglia, et al., in Proceedings of the 9th International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety, July 15–17, 2009 (IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 2009), CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. N. Kolbasov, in Proceedings of the 3rd IAEA Technical Meeting on the First Generation of Fusion Power Plants: Design and Technologies, Vienna, July 13–15, 2009, and 9th IAEA Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety, July 15–17, 2009, Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser. Termoyad. Sintez, No. 3, 70 (2009). http://vantiterruru/vant_2009_3/14pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. V. Kuteev, P. N. Alekseev, G. G. Gladush, A. A. Golikov, A. V. Golubeva, P. R. Goncharov, et al., Project No. 230-15/6971 (Kurchatov. Inst., Moscow, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Anderl, R. J. Pawelko, G. R. Smolik, F. ScaffidiArgentina, and D. Davydov, Fusion Technol. 38, 283 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Xiao, J. R. Travis, W. Breitung, and T. Jordan, in Proceedings of the 9th International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety, July 15–17 2009 (IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 2009), CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Gulden, in Proceedings of the 9th International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Safety, July 15–17, 2009 (IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 2009), CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Yu. Biryukov, V. A. Brikov, V. D. Butsky, D. A. Davydov, V. V. Filatov, D. A. Karpov, B. N. Kolbasov, V. M. Kozhevin, D. K. Kurbatov, A. N. Makhankov, E. V. Makhonina, I. V. Mazul, G. M. Molchanov, V. S. Petrov, O. F. Pozdnyakov, and P. V. Romanov, ITER Final Report of the RF Design Office, Task D3 (Efremov Inst., St.-Petersburg, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Scaffidi-Argentina, S. Ciattaglia, P. Coad, R. D. Penzhorn, V. Philipps, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 307–311, 1411 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Azizov, P. N. Alekseev, B. V. Kuteev, V. A. Belyakov, A. N. Kalashnikov, S. V. Lebedev, A. V. Lopatkin, V. D. Risovanyi, and V. E. Cherkovets, Report at Workshop on Projects of Pre-Industrial Hybride Reactor (PIHR) and Demonstration Thermonuclear Neutron Source (DEMO-TIN), Kurchatov. Inst., Moscow, February 17–18, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. V. Ignat’ev, Report at Workshop on Projects of PreIndustrial Hybride Reactor (PIHR) and Demonstration Thermonuclear Neutron Source (DEMO-TIN), Kurchatov. Inst., Moscow, February 17–18, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. V. Kuteev, P. N. Alekseev, A. A. Golikov, A. V. Golubeva, P. R. Goncharov, M. I. Gurevich, et al., Report No. 230-15/7014-13 (Kurchatov. Inst., Moscow, 2013).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. N. Kolbasov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © B.N. Kolbasov, 2014, published in Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Tekhniki. Seriya: Termoyadernyi Sintez, 2014, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 31–37.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolbasov, B.N. Maximal design basis accident of fusion neutron source DEMO-TIN. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 78, 1128–1133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377881510004X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377881510004X

Keywords

Navigation