Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 76, Issue 12, pp 1465–1481 | Cite as

Short-range components of nuclear forces: Experiment versus mythology

Nuclei Theory

Abstract

The present-day situation around the description of various (central, spin-orbit, and tensor) components of short-range nuclear forces is discussed. A traditional picture of these interactions based on the idea of one-meson exchange is contrasted against numerous results of recent experiments. As is shown in the present study, these results often deviate strongly from the predictions of traditional models. One can therefore state that such models are inapplicable to describing short-range nuclear forces and that it is necessary to go over from a traditional description to some alternative QCD-based (or QCD-motivated) picture. This means that, despite the widespread popularity of traditional concepts of short-range nuclear forces and their applicability in many particular cases, these concepts are not more than scientific myths that show their inconsistency when analyzed from the viewpoint of the modern experiment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. A. Leksin, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 378 (1957).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. B. Gavrilov and G. A. Leksin, in Proceedings of the 10th Physics School at Inst. Theor. Exp. Phys. (Energoizdat, Moscow, 1983), No. 1, p. 46.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. D. Bayukov et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 116 (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. A. Leksin, Phys. At. Nucl. 65, 1985 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. G. Ableev et al., JETP Lett. 37, 233 (1983); Nucl. Phys. A 393, 491 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Kuehn et al., Phys. Lett. B 334, 298 (1994); L. S. Azhgirey et al., Phys. Lett. B 387, 37 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Piasetzky et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 162504 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Shneor et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 072501 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Hen, A. Accardi, W. Melnitchouk, and E. Piasetzky, Phys. Rev. D 84, 117501 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Hen, E. Piasetzky, and L. B. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. C 85, 047301 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Fomin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 092502 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Glöckle et al., Phys. Rep. 274, 107 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. L. Groep et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 014005 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. G. Middleton et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 152501 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Niccolai et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 064003 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. J. de Swart, R. A. M. M. Klomp, M. C. M. Rentmeester, and Th. A. Rijken, Few-Body Syst. Suppl. 8, 437 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Fujita and H. Miyazawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 360 (1957).ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Tornow et al., Phys. Lett. B 257, 273 (1991); D. Hüber and J. L. Friar, Phys. Rev. C 58, 674 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. E. McAninch, L. O. Lamm, and W. Haeberli, Phys. Rev. C 50, 589 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Tornow, H. Witała, and A. Kievsky, Phys. Rev. C 57, 555 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., EPJ Web of Conf. 3, 05024 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Suda et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 915, 920 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Witała, J. Golak, W. Glöckle, and H. Kamada, Phys. Rev. C 71, 054001 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Rauprich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 535, 313 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Deltuva, A. C. Fonseca, and P. U. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054004 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Ohnaka, talk at the 20th International IUPAP Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics (FB20), Fukuoka, 2012, Poster session, PS-40.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    X. C. Ruan et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 057001 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Tanaka, talk at the 20th International IUPAP Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics (FB20), Fukuoka, 2012, Poster session, PS-38.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Witała, talk at the 20th International IUPAP Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics (FB20), Fukuoka, 2012, Poster session, PS-36.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. M. Laget, Phys. Rep. 69, 1 (1981); Phys. Rev. C 35, 832 (1987); J. Phys. G 14, 1445 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009); D. R. Entem, R. Machleidt, and H. Witala, Phys. Rev. C 65, 064005 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Barnes, S. Capstick, M. D. Kovarik, and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. C 48, 539 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Plaemper, J. Flender, and M. F. Gari, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2370 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Haidenbauer, K. Holinde, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2331 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fl. Stancu, S. Pepin, and L. Ya. Glozman, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2779 (1997); D. Barz and Fl. Stancu, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1756 (1999); Phys. Rev. C 63, 034001 (2001); Fl. Stancu and L. Ya. Glozman, Nucl. Phys. A 683, 359 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Valcarce, F. Fernández, and P. González, Phys. Rev. C 56, 3026 (1997); A. Valcarce, F. Fernández, P. González, and V. Vento, Few-Body Syst. Suppl. 8, 340 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    D. R. Entem et al., Nucl. Phys. A 602, 308 (1996).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. M. Kusainov, V. G. Neudatchin, and I. T. Obukhovsky, Phys. Rev. C 44, 2343 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    V. I. Kukulin and V. N. Pomerantsev, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3021 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    V. M. Krasnopol’skiĭ and V. I. Kukulin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 470 (1974); V. I. Kukulin and V. N. Pomerantsev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 111, 330 (1976).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Faessler et al., Nucl. Phys. A 402, 555 (1983); V. G. Neudatchin, Yu. F. Smirnov, and R. Tamagaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 58, 1072 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    F. Myhrer and J. Wroldsen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 629 (1988); M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66, 572 (1981); Nucl. Phys. A 402, 477 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    V. I. Kukulin, Phys. At. Nucl. 74, 1567 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    V. I. Kukulin, I. T. Obukhovsky, V. N. Pomerantsev, and A. Faessler, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 11, 1 (2002); V. I. Kukulin, Few-Body Syst. Suppl. 14, 71 (2003); in Exciting Hadrons, Proceedings of the Mini-Workshop, Bled, 2005, p. 8.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    V. I. Kukulin and V. N. Pomerantsev, Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 1786 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    V. I. Kukulin et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 325, 1173 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    T.-S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 29, 195 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    J. Arvieux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 19 (1983); E. Cheung et al., Phys. Lett. B 284, 210 (1992); A. A. Nomofilov et al., Phys. Lett. B 325, 327 (1994); T. Aono et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4997 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    R. Jastrow, Phys. Rev. 79, 389 (1950); Phys. Rev. 81, 165 (1951); Phys. Rev. 98, 1479 (1955).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, vol. 1: Single-Particle Motion, (Benjamin, New York, 1969; Mir, Moscow, 1971).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    K. Holinde, Nucl. Phys. A 543, 143C (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    I. P. Auer et al., Phys. Lett. B 70, 475 (1977); Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 354 (1978); Ed. K. Biegert et al., Phys. Lett. B 73, 235 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    N. Hoshizaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 60, 1796 (1978); 61, 129 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. H. Mac Gregor, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1616 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, R. L. Workman, and D. V. Bugg, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1926 (1993); R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 50, 1796 (1994); R. A. Arndt, C. H. Oh, I. I. Strakovsky, et al., Phys. Rev. C 56, 3005 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    I. I. Strakovsky, AIP Conf. Proc. 221, 218 (1991); I. I. Strakovsky, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 22, 296 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    K. I. Blomqvist et al., Phys. Lett. B 424, 33 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    J. M. Laget, Phys. Lett. B 609, 49 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    M. Frodyma et al., Phys. Rev. C 47, 1599 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    W. U. Boeglin et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 054001 (2008); B. Hu et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 064004 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    J. D. Walecka, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 83, 491 (1974); B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 16, 1 (1986); B. D. Serot, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 1855 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    M. Ablikim et al., Phys. Lett. B 645, 19 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    V. Bernard, U.-G. Meißner, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 966 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    E. Oset et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 351 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    M. M. Kaskulov and H. Clement, Phys. Rev. C 70, 014002 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    T. Hatsuda, T. Kunihiro, and H. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2840 (1999); T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 158 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    M. K. Volkov et al., Phys. Lett. B 424, 235 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    A. E. Inopin, hep-ph/0404048.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    L. Ya. Glozman, Phys. Lett. B 475, 329 (2000); L. Ya. Glozman and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. D 76, 096004 (2007); A. V. Nefediev, J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, and A. P. Szczepaniak, JETP Lett. 87, 271 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    P. Adlarson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 242302 (2011); M. Bashkanov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 052301 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    A. Abashian, N. E. Booth, and K. M. Crowe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 258 (1960); N. E. Booth, A. Abashian, and K. M. Crowe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 35 (1961); Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 393 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    M. N. Platonova and V. I. Kukulin, Phys. Rev. C 87, 025202 (2013); arXiv: 1211.0444 [nucl-th].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear PhysicsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations