Advertisement

Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 76, Issue 10, pp 1224–1229 | Cite as

Dissociation of 10C nuclei in a track nuclear emulsion at an energy of 1.2 GeV per nucleon

  • K. Z. Mamatkulov
  • R. R. Kattabekov
  • S. S. Alikulov
  • D. A. Artemenkov
  • R. N. Bekmirzaev
  • V. Bradnova
  • P. I. Zarubin
  • I. G. Zarubina
  • N. V. Kondratieva
  • N. K. Kornegrutsa
  • D. O. Krivenkov
  • A. I. Malakhov
  • K. Olimov
  • N. G. Peresadko
  • N. G. Polukhina
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
  • V. V. Rusakova
  • R. Stanoeva
  • S. P. Kharlamov
Elementary Particles and Fields Experiment

Abstract

The charge topology in the fragmentation of 10C nuclei in a track nuclear emulsion at an energy of 1.2 GeV per nucleon is studied. In the coherent dissociation of 10C nuclei, about 82% of events are associated with the channel 10C → 2α+ 2p. The angular distributions and correlations of product fragments are presented for this channel. It is found that among 10C → 2α+ 2p events, about 30% are associated with the process in which dissociation through the ground state of the unstable 9Beg.s. nucleus is followed by 8Beg.s. + p decays.

Keywords

Rayleigh Distribution White Star Mixed Beam Relativistic Fragment Track Nuclear Emulsion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The BECQUEREL Project, http://becquerel.jinr.ru/
  2. 2.
    N. G. Peresad’ko et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1226 (2007); nucl-ex/0605014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Stanoeva et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 690 (2009); arXiv: 0906.4220 [nucl-ex].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. O. Krivenkov et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 73, 2103 (2010); arXiv: 1104.2439 [nucl-ex].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. A. Artemenkov et al., Few-Body Syst. 50, 259 (2011); arXiv: 1105.2374 [nucl-ex].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. A. Artemenkov et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 993 (2011); arXiv: 1106.1748 [nucl-ex].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. R. Kattabekov, K. Z. Mamatkulov, D. A. Artemenkov, et al., Phys.At. Nucl. 73, 2110 (2010); arXiv: 1104.5320 [nucl-ex].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Feshbach and K. Huang, Phys. Lett. B 47, 300 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. S. Goldhaber, Phys. Lett. B 53, 306 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. G. Peresad’ko, V. N. Fetisov, Yu. A. Aleksandrov, et al., JETP Lett. 88, 75 (2008); arXiv: 1110.2881 [nucl-ex].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. A. Artemenkov et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1222 (2007); nucl-ex/0605018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. A. Artemenkov et al., Few-Body Syst. 44, 273 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Ozawa, T. Suzuki, and I. Tanihata, Nucl. Phys. A 693, 32 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Z. Mamatkulov
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. R. Kattabekov
    • 1
    • 3
  • S. S. Alikulov
    • 2
  • D. A. Artemenkov
    • 1
  • R. N. Bekmirzaev
    • 2
  • V. Bradnova
    • 1
  • P. I. Zarubin
    • 1
  • I. G. Zarubina
    • 1
  • N. V. Kondratieva
    • 1
  • N. K. Kornegrutsa
    • 1
  • D. O. Krivenkov
    • 1
  • A. I. Malakhov
    • 1
  • K. Olimov
    • 3
  • N. G. Peresadko
    • 4
  • N. G. Polukhina
    • 4
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
    • 1
  • V. V. Rusakova
    • 1
  • R. Stanoeva
    • 1
    • 5
  • S. P. Kharlamov
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow oblastRussia
  2. 2.A. Kodirii Jizzakh State Pedagogical InstituteJizzakhRepublic of Uzbekistan
  3. 3.Institute for Physics and TechnologyUzbek Academy of SciencesTashkentRepublic of Uzbekistan
  4. 4.Lebedev Physical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  5. 5.South-West UniversityBlagoevgradBulgaria

Personalised recommendations