Advertisement

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 189–201 | Cite as

Polarization Phenomena in Transparency and Absorption Effects Induced by the Field of Unidirectional Waves

  • E. G. Saprykin
  • A. A. Chernenko
Atoms, Molecules, Optics
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Physical processes that form the spectra of saturated absorption and magnetic scanning resonances on an atomic transition with level momentum J = 1 in the field of unidirectional waves of arbitrary intensity under variation in their polarization directions are investigated by numerical simulation and analytically. It is shown that anomalies in nonlinear resonance spectra are determined by the polarization of the waves and the degree of openness of the atomic transition, while anomalies in the experimentally observed magnetic scanning spectra are attributed to the magnetic coherence induced by the fields directly on the levels of the lower state, rather than to its transfer from the excited states, as was assumed earlier.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. E. Bell and A. L. Bloom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 280 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. B. Aleksandrov, Sov. Phys. Usp. 15, 436 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. G. Saprykin, A. A. Chernenko, and A. M. Shalagin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 119, 196 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. M. Akulshin, S. Barreiro, and A. Lesama, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2996 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. V. Taichenachev, A. M. Tumaikin, and V. I. Yudin, JETP Lett. 69, 819 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. V. Brazhnikov, A. V. Taichenachev, A. M. Tumaikin, V. I. Yudin, I. I. Ryabtsev, and V. M. Entin, JETP Lett. 91, 625 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. K. Kim, H. S. Moon, K. Kim, et al., Phys. Rev. A 61, 063813 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Goren, A. D. Wilson-Gordon, M. Rosenbluh, et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 033807 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. V. Lazebnyi, D. V. Brazhnikov, A. V. Taichenachev, M. Yu. Basalaev, and V. I. Yudin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 121, 934 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. G. Rautian, JETP Lett. 60, 481 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. G. Rautian and E. G. Saprykin, Opt. Spectrosc. 92, 342 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. G. Saprykin, S. N. Seleznev, and V. A. Sorokin, JETP Lett. 76, 264 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. G. Saprykin, A. A. Chernenko, and A. M. Shalagin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 123, 205 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. G. Rautian, G. I. Smirnov, and A. M. Shalagin, Nonlinear Resonances in Spectra of Atoms and Molecules (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1979), p. 310 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. G. Rautian, E. G. Saprykin, and A. A. Chernenko, Opt. Spectrosc. 104, 567 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. G. Saprykin, A. A. Chernenko, and A. M. Shalagin, Opt. Spectrosc. 113, 530 (2012).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Raghwinder and M. Pattabiraman, Eur. Phys. J. D 70, 219 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. G. Saprykin, S. N. Seleznev, and V. A. Sorokin, Opt. Spectrosc. 85, 658 (1998).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Automation and Electrometry, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations