Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguishability of quantum states and shannon complexity in quantum cryptography

  • Atoms, Molecules, Optics
  • Published:
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proof of the security of quantum key distribution is a rather complex problem. Security is defined in terms different from the requirements imposed on keys in classical cryptography. In quantum cryptography, the security of keys is expressed in terms of the closeness of the quantum state of an eavesdropper after key distribution to an ideal quantum state that is uncorrelated to the key of legitimate users. A metric of closeness between two quantum states is given by the trace metric. In classical cryptography, the security of keys is understood in terms of, say, the complexity of key search in the presence of side information. In quantum cryptography, side information for the eavesdropper is given by the whole volume of information on keys obtained from both quantum and classical channels. The fact that the mathematical apparatuses used in the proof of key security in classical and quantum cryptography are essentially different leads to misunderstanding and emotional discussions [1]. Therefore, one should be able to answer the question of how different cryptographic robustness criteria are related to each other. In the present study, it is shown that there is a direct relationship between the security criterion in quantum cryptography, which is based on the trace distance determining the distinguishability of quantum states, and the criterion in classical cryptography, which uses guesswork on the determination of a key in the presence of side information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A 82, 062304 (2010); H. P. Yuen, arXiv:1109.1051 [quant-ph]; H. P. Yuen, arXiv: 1109.2675 [quant-ph]; H. P. Yuen, arXiv:1109.1066 [quant-ph]; R. Renner, arXiv:1209.2423[quant-ph].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Renner, PhD Thesis (ETH Zürich, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Portmann and R. Renner, arXiv:1409.3525[quantph].

  4. C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Technol. J. 28, 656 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. M. Arbekov, Mat. Vopr. Kriptogr. 7, 39 (2016).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. M. Wilde, arXiv:1106.1445 [quant-ph].

  7. J. O. Pliam, PhD Thesis (Minnesota Univ., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. N. Molotkov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 123, 784 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Massey, IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, 204 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, Chichester, 1991).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Arikan, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 42, 99 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Molotkov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.M. Arbekov, S.N. Molotkov, 2017, published in Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 2017, Vol. 152, No. 1, pp. 62–78.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arbekov, I.M., Molotkov, S.N. Distinguishability of quantum states and shannon complexity in quantum cryptography. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 125, 50–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776117060085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776117060085

Navigation