Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selected problems of baryon spectroscopy: Chiral soliton versus quark models

  • Nuclei, Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Astrophysics
  • Published:
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inconsistency between the rigid rotator and bound state models at an arbitrary number of colors, the rigid rotator—soft rotator dilemma, and some other problems of baryon spectroscopy are discussed in the framework of the chiral soliton approach (CSA). Consequences of the comparison of CSA results with simple quark models are considered and the 1/N c expansion for the effective strange antiquark mass is presented, as it follows from the CSA. Strong dependence of the effective strange antiquark mass on the SU(3) multiplet is required to fit the CSA predictions. The difference between “good” and “bad” diquark masses, which is about 100 MeV, is in reasonable agreement with other estimates. Multibaryons (hypernuclei) with strangeness are described and some states of interest are also predicted within the CSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Diakonov and M. Éídes, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 38(7), 358 (1983) [JETP Lett. 38 (7), 433 (1983)]; J. Balog, Phys. Lett. B 149, 197 (1984); A. Andrianov, V. Andrianov, Yu. Novozhilov, and V. Novozhilov, Lett. Math. Phys. 11, 217 (1986); Phys. Lett. B 186, 401 (1987); Phys. Lett. B 203, 160 (1988); V. Andrianov and V. Novozhilov, Yad. Fiz. 43, 983 (1986) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43, 626 (1986)].

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Adkins, C. Nappi, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 228, 552 (1983); V. Kopeliovich, Yad. Fiz. 47, 1495 (1988) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 47, 949 (1988)]; E. Braaten and L. Carson, Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 38, 3525 (1988); P. Irwin, Phys. Rev. D 61, 114024 (2000); S. Krusch, Ann. Phys. (Weinheim) 304, 103 (2003); Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 462, 2001 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. O. V. Manko, N. S. Manton, and S. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. C: Nucl. Phys. 76, 055 203 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Kopeliovich, A. Shunderuk, and G. Matushko, Yad. Fiz. 69(1), 124 (2006) [Phys. At. Nucl. 69 (1), 120 (2006)]; V. Kopeliovich and A. Shunderuk, Eur. Phys. J. A 33, 277 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Guadagnini, Nucl. Phys. B 236, 35 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Kopeliovich, Fiz. Élem. Chastits At. Yadra 37(4), 1184 (2006) [Phys. Part. Nucl. 37 (4), 623 (2006)].

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Kopeliovich and A. Shunderuk, Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 73, 094 018 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Kaplan and I. Klebanov, Nucl. Phys. B 335, 45 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Callan and I. Klebanov, Nucl. Phys. B 262, 365 (1985); N. Scoccola, H. Nadeau, M. Nowak, and M. Rho, Phys. Lett. B 201, 425 (1988); C. Callan, K. Hornbostel, and I. Klebanov, Phys. Lett. B 202, 269 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Praszalowicz, in Proceedings of the Workshop “Skyrmions and Anomalies,” Krakow, Poland, 1987 (Krakow, 1987), p. 112; H. Walliser, Nucl. Phys. A 548, 649 (1992); D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. Polyakov, Z. Phys. A: Hadrons Nucl. 359, 305 (1997); M. Praszalowicz, Phys. Lett. B 575, 234 (2003).

  11. N. Itzhaki, I. Klebanov, P. Ouyang, and L. Rastelli, Nucl. Phys. B 684, 264 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Cohen, Phys. Lett. B 581, 175 (2004); Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 70, 014 011 (2004); T. Cohen and R. Lebed, Phys. Lett. B 578, 150 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Walliser and H. Weigel, Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 361 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Yabu and K. Ando, Nucl. Phys. B 301, 601 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Walliser and V. Kopeliovich, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 124(3), 483 (2003) [JETP 97 (3), 433 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232 003 (2003).

  17. F. Wilczek, arXiv:hep-ph/0409168; Ian Kogan Memorial Volume, Ed. by M. Shifman (World Sci., Singapore, 2004), p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Dudek and F. Close, Phys. Lett. B 583, 278 (2004); F. Close and J. Dudek, Phys. Lett. B 586, 75 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Babich, N. Garran, C. Hoelbling, J. Howard, L. Lellouch, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 76, 074 021 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Schwesinger and H. Weigel, Phys. Lett. B 267, 438 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Houghton, N. Manton, and P. Sutcliffe, Nucl. Phys. B 510, 507 (1998).

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. V. Kopeliovich, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 73(11), 667 (2001) [JETP Lett. 73 (11), 587 (2001)]; J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 28, 103 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Kopeliovich, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 120(3), 499 (2001) [JETP 93 (3), 435]; Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 123 (5), 891 (2003) [JETP 96 (5), 782 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Kopeliovich, B. Schwesinger, and B. Stern, Nucl. Phys. A 549, 485 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J. T. Goldman, K. Maltman, G. Stephenson, K. E. Schmidt, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 627 (1987); J. T. Goldman, AIP Conf. Proc. 243, 562 (1992); H.-R. Pang, J.-l. Ping, F. Wang, T. Goldman, and E. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C: Nucl. Phys. 69, 065 207 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Kopeliovich and A. Shunderuk, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 127(5), 1055 (2005) [JETP 100 (5), 922 (2005)].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Akaishi and T. Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. C: Nucl. Phys. 65, 044 005 (2002); arXiv:nucl-th/0709.0630.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117312, Russia

    V. B. Kopeliovich

Authors
  1. V. B. Kopeliovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Kopeliovich.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopeliovich, V.B. Selected problems of baryon spectroscopy: Chiral soliton versus quark models. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 108, 770–783 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776109050069

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776109050069

PACS numbers

Search

Navigation