Skip to main content
Log in

Sickles of Late Bronze Age from the Crimea and Taman: Material and Features of Manufacturing Technology

  • CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC METHODS IN HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES
  • Published:
Crystallography Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The alloy composition of the sickles (the most important and widespread tools of the Late Bronze Age) originating from the territory of the plain Crimea and the Taman Peninsula and features of their manufacturing technology have been investigated. An X-ray fluorescence analysis of the alloy composition for 13 sickles found in that region showed that most of the studied products were cast from low-alloyed copper-arsenic bronze with a small arsenic content: a traditional Caucasian type of alloys (Kuban metallurgical group). An exception was the sickle from the Chorelek 1 settlement in the southeast of the Kerch Peninsula, which was made of copper with a small addition of tin, which is typical of the European (Carpathian) metallurgical province. The features of the sickle technological processing were visualized for the first time using X-ray and neutron tomography. Based on the characteristic pore distribution pattern formed as a result of directional forging, casting defects, and other traces of processing, it was suggested that the sickle was cast into a stone or clay mold through the handle, after which the product blade was carefully forged. This approach made it possible to achieve maximum blade hardness and, correspondingly, the highest productivity of this agricultural tool. The other parts of the sickle, including the handle, were either subjected to much less intense forging or not forged at all. The high skill of sickle’s manufacturer indicates that high-quality reaping tools were in demand among the population of Taurica in Late Bronze Age, which may indicate indirectly the orientation of its economic activity towards the cultivation of cereal cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. M. Novichikhin, T. N. Smekalova, and A. A. Demchenko, Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. XXII Bosporan Readings. Cimmerian Bosporus and the World of Barbarians in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: New Discoveries and New Projects, Simferopol, Kerch, 2021, p. 291.

  2. T. N. Smekalova, A. V. Kulikov, D. V. Beilin, et al., Istor. Arkheol. Kryma XIII, 373 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Dergachev and V. S. Bochkarev, Metal Sickles of the Late Bronze Age of Eastern Europe (Vysshaya Antropologicheskaya Shkola, Chisinau, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Trifonov, P. Khommel’, P. Brai, et al., Proc. Int. Conf. “Antiquities of Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Southern Siberia in the Context of the Relationships and Interactions in the Eurasian Cultural Space: New Data and Concepts” (2019), p. 183.

  5. E. N. Chernykh, Sov. Arkheol., No. 2, 150 (1980).

  6. E. N. Chernykh, Sov. Arkheol., No. 4, 53 (1978).

  7. C. A. Schneider, W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri, Nat. Methods 9 (7), 671 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dierick, B. Masschaele, and L. Van Hoorebeke, Meas. Sci. Technol. 15 (7), 1366 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/15/7/020

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. I. Markovin and A. I. Glebov, Sov. Arkheol., No. 2, 239 (1979).

  10. M. Sîrbu, D. Topal, E. Sava, et al., Revista Arheol. 2 (18), 37 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. I. Klochko and A. V. Kozymenko, Ancient Metal of Ukraine (Kiev, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. A. Ioffe, Theory of Casting Processes (Izd-vo SZTU, St. Petersburg, 2009), Vol. 1 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. S. Bochkarev, Ross. Arkheol. Ezheg., No. 2, 194 (2012).

  14. T. V. Blavatskaya, Achaean Greece in the Second Millennium BC (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. Novichikhin, T. N. Smekalova, I. A. Saprykina, et al., Probl. Istor. Filol. Kul’t. (2022) (in press).

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study of the composition of the sickle alloy was carried out using the instrumental base of the Center for the Collective Use of Scientific Equipment (5i Tracer) for archaeometric studies at the Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow), analyst I.A. Saprykina.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the Agreement on the provision of a grant from the federal budget in the form of subsidy no. 075-11-2021-087 on December 22, 2021 (project no. 15.SIN.21.0013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. N. Smekalova or E. Yu. Tereschenko.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by Yu. Sin’kov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smekalova, T.N., Antipenko, A.V., Loboda, A.Y. et al. Sickles of Late Bronze Age from the Crimea and Taman: Material and Features of Manufacturing Technology. Crystallogr. Rep. 67, 1018–1025 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774522060220

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774522060220

Navigation