Abstract
We analyze the use of a promising technique for designing the flight trajectories to Venus with the application of a gravity-assist maneuver and resonant orbits to deliver a lander to regions on the surface of Venus with a high scientific significance where no landing can be made in the classical approach to designing the flight trajectories used in the missions of the Soviet Venera and Vega programs. Within the promising Russian Venera-D mission we consider the landing with the application of the above technique in Vellamo-South and Kutue-South, in which no landing is possible for the launch in 2031 and the classical approach to choosing a landing site. We take into account the constraints imposed by the requirements of accomplishing the flight mission to Venus by a spacecraft consisting of a lander and an orbital module. We show the efficiency of the applied technique both in choosing landing sites for the lander and in choosing an orbit for the orbital module.
Notes
By the spacecraft orbit resonant with the planetary orbit in a \(m:n\) ratio (below such a spacecraft orbit will be called \(m:n\) resonant for short) we mean a heliocentric spacecraft orbit, with the ratio of its period to the orbital period of the planet being a rational number \(m/n\).
From 2006 to 2015 the Venera-D project was included in the Federal Space Program, in 2021 the work on the Venera-D project was resumed, and since 2022 the project is maintained exclusively by the RF.
Report of the Venera-D (JSDT) January 31, 2019) http://www.iki.rssi.ru/events/2019/Venera-DPhaseIIFinalReport.pdf (access date September 15, 2022).
The perpendicular drawn from the focus of the hyperbolic spacecraft orbit to the asymptote.
The functional being used to search for optimal trajectories is close to the one being currently used within the Venera-D project or, more specifically, \(\Delta V_{0}+\Delta V_{1}\), where \(\Delta V_{1}\) is the braking impulse for injection into a diurnal hesperocentric orbit (Simonov et al. 2021).
REFERENCES
A. T. Basilevsky, M. A. Ivanov, J. W. Head, M. Aittola, and J. Raitala, Planet. Space Sci. 55, (2007).
P. Beauchamp, M. S. Gilmore, R. J. Lynch, B. V. Sarli, A. Nicoletti, A. Jones, A. Ginyard, and M. E. Segura, in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (2021), p. 1.
G. K. Borovin, Yu. F. Golubev, A. V. Grushevskii, et al., in Ballistic–Navigational Support for the Flights of Automatic Spacecraft to Solar System Bodies, Ed. by A. G. Tuchin (NPO Lavochkina, Khimki, 2018), p. 336 [in Russian].
V. A. Egorov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 63, 73 (1957).
N. A. Eismont, L. V. Zasova, A. V. Simonov, et al., Vestn. NPO im. S. A. Lavochkina 11 (4), (2018).
N. A. Eismont, L. V. Zasova, A. V. Simonov, I. D. Kovalenko, D. A. Gorinov, A. S. Abbakumov, and S. A. Bober, Solar Syst. Res. 53, 578 (2019).
N. A. Eismont, V. V. Koryanov, K. S. Fedyaev, et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 2318, 110012 (2021a).
N. A. Eismont, R. R. Nazirov, K. S. Fedyaev, V. A. Zubko, A. A. Belyaev, L. V. Zasova, D. A. Gorinov, and A. V. Simonov, Astron. Lett. 47, 316 (2021b).
N. Eismont, V. Zubko, A. Belyaev, et al., Acta Astronaut. 197, 310 (2022).
P. E. Elyasberg, Introduction to the Theory of Flight of Artificial Earth Satellites (Nauka, Moscow, 1965), p. 460 [in Russian].
J. B. Garvin, S. A. Getty, G. N. Arney, N. M. Johnson, E. Kohler, K. O. Schwer, M. Sekerak, A. Bartels, et al., Planet. Sci. J. 3, 117 (2022).
M. Gilmore, P. M. Beauchamp, R. Lynch, and M. J. Amato, in Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey (2020).
J. S. Greaves, A. M. S. Richards, W. Bains, P. B. Rimmer, H. Sagawa, D. L. Clements, S. Seager, et al., Nat. Astron. 5, 655 (2021).
S. A. Haider, A. Bhardwaj, Shanmugam, et al., in Proceedings of the 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly (2018), p. B4-1.
M. A. Ivanov, Geochem. Int. 54 (2016).
M. A. Ivanov, L. V. Zasova, M. V. Gerasimov, O. I. Korablev, M. Ya. Marov, L. M. Zelenyi, N. I. Ignat’ev, and A. G. Tuchin, Solar Syst. Res. 51, 1 (2017).
M. A. Ivanov, L. Zasova, and T. K. P. Gregg, in Proceedings of the 9th Moscow Solar System Symposium 9M-S3 (2018), p. 58.
M. A. Ivanov, J. W. Head, L. V. Zasova, et al., in Proceedings of the 12th Moscow Solar System Symposium 12M-S3 (2021), p. 109.
V. V. Ivashkin and N. N. Tupitsyn, Kosm. Issled. 9, 163 (1971).
D. Izzo, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 121, 1 (2015).
A. V. Kosenkova, AIP Conf. Proc. 2318, 140003 (2020).
A. V. Kosenkova, O. Yu. Sedykh, A. V. Simonov, and V. E. Minenko, Vestn. NPO im S. A. Lavochkina 1, 12 (2021).
S. S. Limaye, R. Mogul, D. J. Smith, et al., Astrobiology 18, 1181 (2018).
O. Montenbruck, E. Gill, and F. Lutze, Appl. Mech. Rev. 55, B27 (2002).
D. Senske, L. Zasova, T. Economou, et al., in Proceedings of the Planetary Science Vision 2050 Workshop (2017), p. 1.
A. V. Simonov, S. D. Kovaleva, E. S. Gordienko, et al., Nauka Innov., 7 (2021).
S. Smrekar, M. Dyar, S. Hensley, et al., in Proceedings of the 48th AAS/Division Planetary Science Meeting (2016), p. 207.
T. Widemann, R. Ghail, C. F. Wilson, and D. V. Titov, in Agu Fall Meeting Abstracts (2020), p. P022.
L. V. Zasova, D. A. Gorinov, N. A. Eismont, et al., Vestn. NPO im. S. A. Lavochkina 13, (2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by V. Astakhov
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zubko, V.A. Possible Flight Trajectories to Venus with Landing in a Given Region. Astron. Lett. 48, 806–819 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773722110123
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773722110123