Abstract
We consider the time, angular, and energy distributions of SN 1987A events and discuss the quality of their agreement with the expectations. A global interpretation is made by considering a simple model based on the standard scenario for the explosion. Despite the contrasting and confusing indications, a straightforward fit to the data provides a result that does not contradict but rather supports the expectations. The calculated electron antineutrino flux is applied to predict the relic neutrino signal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alekseeva, V. I. Volchenko, and I. V. Krivosheina, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 45, 461 (1987) [JETP Lett. 45, 589 (1987)].
E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alekseeva, V. I. Volchenko, and I. V. Krivosheina, Phys. Lett. B 205, 209 (1988).
H. A. Bethe and J. R. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 295, 14 (1985).
R. M. Bionta, G. Blewitt, C. B. Bratton, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1494 (1987).
C. B. Bratton et al. [IMB Collab.], Phys. Rev. D 37, 3361 (1988).
M. L. Costantini, A. Ianni, and F. Vissani, et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 043006 (2004).
M. L. Costantini, A. Ianni, G. Pagliaroli, and F. Vissani, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0708:014 (2007).
V. L. Dadykin, G. T. Zatsepin, V. B. Korchagin, et al., Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 45, 464 (1987) [JETP Lett. 45, 593 (1987)].
V. L. Dadykin, G. T. Zatsepin, and O. G. Ryazhskaya, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 158, 139 (1989) [Sov. Phys. Usp. 32, 459 (1989)].
K. Hirata et al. [KAMIOKANDE-II Collab.], Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987).
K. H. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. D 38, 448 (1988).
V. S. Imshennik and D. K. Nadyozhin, Astrophys. Space Sci. Phys. Rev. 8, part 1 (1989).
V. S. Imshennik and D. K. Nadyozhin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 6597 (2005).
V. S. Imshennik and O. G. Ryazhskaya, Pis’ma Astron. Zh. 30, 17 (2004) [Astron. Lett. 30, 14 (2004)].
H.-T. Janka et al., astro-ph0708.3372 (2007).
H.-T. Janka and W. Hillebrandt, Astron. Astrophys. 224, 49 (1989).
M. T. Keil, G. G. Raffel, and H.-T. Janka, Astrophys. J. 590, 971 (2003).
T. J. Loredo and D.Q. Lamb, Phys. Rev. D 65, 063002 (2002).
C. Lunardini, Astropart. Phys. 26, 190 (2006).
M. Malek et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collab.], Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 061101 (2003).
A. Mal’gin, Nuovo Cim. C 21, 317 (1998).
A. Mirizzi and G. G. Raffelt, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063001 (2005).
D. K. Nadyozhin, Astrophys. Space Sci. 59, 131 (1978).
G. Pagliaroli, M. L. Costantini, A. Ianni, and F. Vissani, LNGS/TH-01/08, For a preliminary report, astro-ph0708.4032 (2007).
O. G. Ryazhskaya, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 176, 1039 (1989) [Phys. Usp. 49, 1017 (1989)].
Symposium, http://vaxmw.tower.ras.ru/SN1987A (2007).
J. R. Wilson, in Numerical Astrophysics, Ed. by J. Centrella, J. LeBlanc, and R. L. Bowers (Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 1985), p. 422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published in Russian in Pis’ma v Astronomicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 2009, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 3–9.
The article was translated by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vissani, F., Pagliaroli, G. Features of Kamiokande-II, IMB, and Baksan observations and their interpretation in a two-component model for the signal. Astron. Lett. 35, 1–6 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773709010010
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773709010010