Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the galaxy DDO 68: New evidence for its youth

  • Published:
Astronomy Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DDO 68 (UGC 5340) is the second most metal-poor star-forming galaxy (12 + log(O/H) = 7.14). Its peculiar optical morphology and its HI distribution and kinematics are indicative of a merger origin. We use the u, g, r, and i photometry based on the SDSS images of DDO 68 to estimate its stellar population ages. The Hα images of DDO 68 were used to select several representative regions without nebular emission. The derived colors were analyzed by comparison with the PEGASE2 evolutionary tracks for various star formation (SF) scenarios, including the two extreme cases: (i) an instantaneous starburst and (ii) continuous SF with a constant rate. The (ug) and (gr) colors for all of the selected regions are consistent with the scenario of several “instantaneous” SF episodes with ages between ∼0.05 and ∼1 Gyr. The total mass of the visible stars in DDO 68 was estimated by comparing the colors and fluxes of the observed stellar subsystems with PEGASE2 models to be ∼2.4 × 107 M . This accounts for ∼6% of the total baryonic mass of the galaxy. All of the available data are consistent with the fact that DDO 68 is a very rare candidate for young galaxies. The bulk of its stars were formed during the recent (with the first encounter ∼1 Gyr ago) merger of two very gas-rich disks. DDO 68 is closest in its properties to cosmologically young low-mass galaxies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. K. Adelman-McCarthy et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 172, 634 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Aloisi, G. Clementini, M. Tosi, et al., Astrophys. J. 667, L151 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekta, J. N. Chengalur, and S. A. Pustilnik, MNRAS, submitted (2007).

  4. B. G. Elmegreen, M. Kaufmann, M. Thomasson, Astrophys. J. 412, 90 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fioc and B. Rocca-Volmerange, arXiv:astroph/9912179 (1999).

  6. M. Fukugita, T. Ichikawa, J. E. Gunn, et al., Astron. J. 111, 1748 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. E. Gunn, M. A. Carr, C. M. Rockosi, et al., Astron. J. 116, 3040 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. I. Izotov, N. G. Guseva, V. A. Lipovetsky, et al., Nature, 343, 238 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. I. Izotov and T. X. Thuan, Astrophys. J. 616, 768 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. I. Izotov, G. Stasinska, G. Meynet, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 448, 955 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. I. Izotov, P. Papaderos, N. G. Guseva, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 454, 137 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. I. Izotov and T. X. Thuan, Astrophys. J. 665, 1115 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kniazev, S. Pustilnik, J. Masegosa, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 357, 101 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Y. Kniazev, E. K. Grebel, S. A. Pustilnik, et al., Astron. J. 127, 704 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Y. Kniazev and S. A. Pustilnik, in Proc. of IAU Symp. 232, Held in Cape Town, South Africa, Nov. 14–18, 2005, Ed. by P. Whitelock, M. Dennefeld, and B. Leibundgut, Cambridge: (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.-C. Lee, B. K. Gibson, C. Flynn, et al., MNRAS 353, 113 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Legrand, D. Kunth, J.-R. Roy, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 355, 891 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. A. Lipovetsky, F. H. Chaffee, Y. I. Izotov, et al., Astrophys. J. 519, 177 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Lupton, J. E. Gunn, Z. Ivezić, et al., in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X, ASP Conf. Ser. 238, Ed. by F. R. Harnden, Jr., F. A. Primini, and H. E. Payne (San Francisco: ASP, 2001), p. 269.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Lupton et al., http://www.sdss.org/dr5/algorithms/sdssUBVRITransform.html#Lupton2005 (2005).

  21. L. Mattsson, B. Caldwell, and N. Bergvall, arXiv:astro-ph/0712.0345 (2007).

  22. Y. Momany, E. V. Held, I. Saviane, et al., Astron. and Astrophys. 439, 111 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Papaderos, Y. I. Izotov, T. X. Thuan, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 393, 461 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. R. Pier, J. A. Munn, R. B. Hindsley, et al., Astron. J. 125, 1559 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Pustilnik, V. A. Lipovetsky, Y. I. Izotov, et al., Astron. Lett. 23, 308 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. A. Pustilnik, E. Brinks, T. X. Thuan, et al., 121, 1413 (2001).

  27. S. A. Pustilnik, A. Y. Kniazev, A. G. Pramskij, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 409, 917 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. A. Pustilnik, A. G. Pramskij, A. Y. Kniazev, Astron. Astrophys. 425, 51 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S. A. Pustilnik, A. Y. Kniazev, and A. G. Pramskij, Astron. Astrophys. 443, 91 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. A. Pustilnik, D. Engels, A. Y. Kniazev, et al., Astron. Lett. 32, 228 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. A. Pustilnik and J.-M. Martin, Astron. Astrophys. 464, 859 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Finkbeiner, and M. Douglas, Astrophys. J. 500, 525 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Searle and W. L. W. Sargent, Astrophys. J. 173, 25 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. J. A. Smith, D. L. Tucker, S. Kent, et al., Astron. J. 123, 2121 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. V. Springel and L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J. 622, L9 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. V. Springel, T. DiMatteo, and L. Hernquist, MNRAS 361, 776 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. M. Stil, PhD Thesis, Leiden Univ. (1999).

  38. J. M. Stil and F. P. Israel, Astron. Astrophys. 389, 29 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Tosi, A. Aloisi, J. Mack, and M. Maio, in Proc. of IAUS 235 “Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time” (Ed. by F. Combes and J. Palous, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. L. Tucker, S. Kent, M. W. Richmond, et al., Astronomische Nachrichten 327, 821 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. R. B. Tully, E. J. Shaya, I. D. Karachentsev, et al., Astrophys. J. 676, 184 (2008); arXiv:astroph/0705.4139 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. D.G. York, J. Adelman, J. E. Anderson, et al.,Astron. J. 120, 1579 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Zackrisson, N. Bergvall, G. Östlin, et al., Astrophys. J. 650, 812 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Pustilnik.

Additional information

Published in Russian in Pis’ma v Astronomicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 503–515.

This article was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pustilnik, S.A., Tepliakova, A.L. & Kniazev, A.Y. Study of the galaxy DDO 68: New evidence for its youth. Astron. Lett. 34, 457–467 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773708070049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773708070049

PACS numbers

Key words

Navigation