Abstract
The slowdown mechanism of rotating neutron stars (NSs) has long been an important topic in pulsar astronomy, which is still an open question of detailed debate. It is widely understood that it arises from the loss of the rotational kinetic energy (\(E\)) through the magnetic dipole radiation (MDR). This simple model would lead to a relation \(\dot {\Omega } \propto {{\Omega }^{3}}\), where \(\Omega \) and \(\dot {\Omega }\) are the spin angular velocity and its time derivative. However, a sole MDR torque may be oversimple and incorrect, and the above relation could be written in a more general form \(\dot {\Omega } = - K{{\Omega }^{n}}\), where \(K\) is a constant, and \(n\) is known as the braking index, being 3 for the MDR model. The \(n\) value of a pulsar could in principle be directly measured through its \(\ddot {\Omega }\) observation. However, it is difficult to measure the values of \(\ddot {\Omega }\) due to the effects of the timing noise or glitches, making the sample of pulsars with reliable \(n\) observations is very tiny (the number ~10). Therefore, this study aims to estimate a pulsar’s \(n\) value without relying on the observation of \(\ddot {\Omega }\), by employing a simple and convenient \(\dot {E}\) evolution model. In which, the information about the real age \({{t}_{o}}\) of the target pulsar is required as input. Here, we applied this \(\dot {E}\) model to the Crab pulsar since it is the only NS source with a known age. Our results inferred its \(n\) value to be \(2.3 < n < 2.7\), and also constrained several of its initial parameters, e.g., its initial spin period and energy loss rate were limited to be \(0.0180 < {{P}_{i}}\) [s] \( < 0.0197\) and \(2.56 \times {{10}^{{39}}} < {{\dot {E}}_{i}}\) [erg/s] \( < 4.38 \times {{10}^{{39}}}\), respectively. Our above estimated \(n\) value for the Crab pulsar is consistent with the observation based on its \(\ddot {\Omega }\) measurement, as \({{n}_{{{\text{obs}}}}} = 2.51 \pm 0.01\). The departure of its \(n\) value from the canonical 3 may be interpreted by a combination of a particle wind flow torque and an increase of the magnetic inclination angle, along with the classical MDR model. Our method may be applied to approximately evaluate the \(n\) values for more Crab-like pulsars in the future if their true ages can be accurately measured through a new methodology.
REFERENCES
A. Hewish, S. J. Bell, J. D. H. Pilkington, P. F. Scott, and R. A. Collins, Nature (London, U.K.) 217, 709 (1968).
R. N. Manchester and J. H. Taylor, Pulsars (W. H. Free-man, San Francisco, CA, 1977).
S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects (Wiley, New York, 1983).
A. Lyne and F. Graham-Smith, Pulsar Astronomy (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).
D. R. Lorimer and M. Kramer, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).
F. Pacini, Nature (London, U.K.) 216, 567 (1967).
F. Pacini, Nature (London, U.K.) 219, 145 (1968).
J. E. Gunn and J. P. Ostriker, Nature (London, U.K.) 221, 454 (1969).
J. P. Ostriker and J. E. Gunn, Astrophys. J. 157, 1395 (1969).
G. Chanmugam, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30, 143 (1992).
W. C. G. Ho and N. Andersson, Nat. Phys. 8, 787 (2012).
A. G. Lyne, C. A. Jordan, F. Graham-Smith, C. M. Espinoza, B. W. Stappers, and P. Weltevrede, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 857 (2015).
P. Goldreich, F. Pacini, and M. J. Rees, Comm. Astrophys. Space Phys. 3, 185 (1971).
M. A. Livingstone, V. M. Kaspi, F. P. Gavriil, and R. N. Manchester, Astrophys. J. 619, 1046 (2005).
R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs, Astron. J. 129, 1993 (2005).
J. M. Cordes and D. J. Helfand, Astrophys. J. 239, 640 (1980).
A. Lyne, G. Hobbs, M. Kramer, I. Stairs, and B. Stappers, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 329, 408 (2010).
C. M. Espinoza, A. G. Lyne, B. W. Stappers, and M. Kramer, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 1679 (2011).
A. E. Chukwude and F. Chidi Odo, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 16, 150 (2016).
C. M. Espinoza, A. G. Lyne, M. Kramer, R. N. Manchester, and V. M. Kaspi, Astrophys. J. Lett. 741, L13 (2011).
R. F. Archibald, E. V. Gotthelf, R. D. Ferdman, V. M. Kaspi, et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 819, L16 (2016).
Y.-Y. Yang, C.-M. Zhang, D. Li, L. Chen, R.-F. Linghu, and Q.-J. Zhi, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 064201 (2019).
X.-H. Cui, C.-M. Zhang, D. Li, J.-W. Zhang, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 279 (2021).
J. Zhang, C. Zhang, D. Li, W. Yang, et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 134, 114201 (2022).
A. G. Lyne, R. S. Pritchard, and F. Graham Smith, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 265, 1003 (1993).
R. D. Blandford and R. W. Romani, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 234, 57P (1988).
R. X. Xu and G. J. Qiao, Astrophys. J. Lett. 561, L85 (2001).
C. Alvarez and A. Carramiñana, Astron. Astrophys. 414, 651 (2004).
W. C. Chen and X. D. Li, Astron. Astrophys. 450, L1 (2006).
F. F. Kou and H. Tong, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 1990 (2015).
J. Pétri, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 4573 (2019).
C. Zhang, X. Cui, D. Li, D. Wang, et al., Universe 8, 628 (2022).
F. C. Michel and W. H. Tucker, Nature (London, U.K.) 223, 277 (1969).
A. K. Harding, I. Contopoulos, and D. Kazanas, Astrophys. J. Lett. 525, L125 (1999).
M. G. Alford and K. Schwenzer, Astrophys. J. 781, 26 (2014).
M. P. Allen and J. E. Horvath, Astrophys. J. 488, 409 (1997).
A. Melatos, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, 1049 (1997).
K. Chen, M. Ruderman, and T. Zhu, Astrophys. J. 493, 397 (1998).
T. M. Tauris and S. Konar, Astron. Astrophys. 376, 543 (2001).
S.-X. Yi and S.-N. Zhang, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 3674 (2015).
Y. Xie, S.-N. Zhang, and J.-Y. Liao, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 15, 963 (2015).
S. Mereghetti, J. A. Pons, and A. Melatos, Space Sci. Rev. 191, 315 (2015).
O. Hamil, J. R. Stone, M. Urbanec, and G. Urbancová, Phys. Rev. D 91, 063007 (2015).
O. Hamil, N. J. Stone, and J. R. Stone, Phys. Rev. D 94, 063012 (2016).
S. Johnston and A. Karastergiou, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3493 (2017).
F. Pacini and M. Salvati, Astrophys. J. 186, 249 (1973).
E. P. J. van den Heuvel, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 312, 539 (2006).
D. Lorimer, N. Pol, K. Rajwade, K. Aggarwal, et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 261 (2019).
L. Dirson, J. Pétri, and D. Mitra, Astron. Astrophys. 667, A82 (2022).
M. A. Ruderman and P. G. Sutherland, Astrophys. J. 196, 51 (1975).
D. Bhattacharya and E. P. J. van den Heuvel, Phys. Rep. 203, 1 (1991).
K. Chen and M. Ruderman, Astrophys. J. 402, 264 (1993).
A. Lyne, F. Graham-Smith, P. Weltevrede, C. Jordan, B. Stappers, C. Bassa, and M. Kramer, Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 342, 598 (2013).
F. Camilo, S. E. Thorsett, and S. R. Kulkarni, Astrophys. J. Lett. 421, L15 (1994).
D. Lai, Astrophys. J. Lett. 466, L35 (1996).
V. M. Kaspi, M. E. Roberts, G. Vasisht, E. V. Gotthelf, M. Pivovaroff, and N. Kawai, Astrophys. J. 560, 371 (2001).
S. Zhang and Y. Xie, in Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar Astrophysics, Ed. by S. Qain, K. Leung, L. Zhu, and S. Kwok, ASP Conf. Ser. 451, 231 (2011).
G. Ferrand and S. Safi-Harb, Adv. Space Res. 49, 1313 (2012).
C.-Q. Ye, D.-H. Wang, C.-M. Zhang, and Z.-Q. Diao, Astrophys. Space Sci. 364, 198 (2019).
A. G. Lyne, B. Anderson, and M. J. Salter, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 201, 503 (1982).
J. M. Cordes, Astrophys. J. 311, 183 (1986).
S. R. Kulkarni, Astrophys. J. Lett. 306, L85 (1986).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks Chengmin Zhang, Di Li and Xianghan Cui at the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAOC) for their helpful discussions of the manuscript, and acknowledges support from Jian-Wei Mountain House. I thank the anonymous referee for the critical comments and suggestions that have significantly improved the quality of the paper.
Funding
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC (11988101, 11773005, U2031203, U1631236, 11703001, U1731238, U1938117, 12163001, 11725313, 11721303), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences grant no. 114A11KYSB20210010, the National Key R&D Program of China no. 2016YFA0400702, and the Subsidy project of the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 2021GZJ006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
As author of this work, I declare that I have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J. Estimation of the Pulsar Braking Index Using the Evolution of the Rotational Kinetic Energy Loss Rate. Testing on the Crab Pulsar. Astron. Rep. 67, 1187–1192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772923110124
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772923110124