Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the Change in the Relative Number of Pores in Activity Cycles on the Reconstruction of the Sunspot Index

  • Published:
Astronomy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of the relative number of groups in cycles 21–24 based on the digitization of observations of sunspots at the Locarno Observatory (Locarno, Switzerland) was performed. In the Zurich classification of sunspot groups, there are classes from A to J. The classes correspond to the process of development and decay of sunspot groups. Class A and B groups correspond to single pores or small pore clusters (class A) and bipolar group (class B). For the reconstruction of solar indices, the relative number of groups (A + B) is of great importance. We found significant variations in the relative number of spot groups (A + B) in the activity cycles. If the relative number of groups (A + B) at the activity minima is 45–50%, then a decrease to 25–30% at the activity cycle maxima is observed. In the original spot index R, proposed by R. Wolf, pores were not considered, and many cores united by one penumbra were counted as one spot. After 1893, at the suggestion of A. Wolfer, the method of calculating the sunspot index changed. The pores and all individual cores in the spots began to be considered – this index is denoted by Rz. It is believed that between the spot indices of the Wolf (R) and Wolfer (Rz), there is a constant transition coefficient close to R/Rz = 0.6. We found that this assumption is incorrect, and R/Rz depends on the amplitude of the activity cycle, varying for the N19 cycle R19~ 0.34, and for the period of the grand minimum RMM ~ 0.64.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. J. Bray and R. E. Loughead, Sunspots (Wiley, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Waldmeier, The Sunspot-Activity in the Years 1610–1960 (Zurich Schulthess, Zurich, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. M. Chernan, The Handbook of Solar Flare Monitoring and Propagation Forecasting (Tab Books, Summit, PA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. E. Feehrer, Dances with Wolf’s: A Short History of Sunspot Indices. http://www.aavso.org/dances-wolfs-short-history-sunspot-indices. Accessed August 2000.

  5. D. Berghmans, R. A. M. van der Linden, P. Vanlommel, F. Clette, and E. Robbrecht, in Beitrage zur Geschichte der Geophysik und Kosmischen Physik (Arbeitskreis Geschichte Geophys. Kosm. Phys., 2006), Vol. VII, No. 1, p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Clette, L. Svalgaard, J. M. Vaquero, and E. W. Cliver, Space Sci. Rev. 186, 35 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Coffey, C. D. Hanchett, and E. H. Erwin, J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 27, 55 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Waldmeier, Zeitschr. Astrophys. 6, 276 (1938).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kleczek, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 4, 9 (1953).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. O. Kiepenheuer, in The Sun, Ed. G. P. Kuiper (Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, 1953), p. 344.

  11. S. Cortesi, M. Cagnotti, M. Bianda, R. Ramelli, and A. Manna, Solar Phys. 291, 3075 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. I. G. Usoskin, G. A. Kovaltsov, M. Lockwood, K. Mur-sula, M. Owens, and S. K. Solanki, Solar Phys. 291, 2685 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Svalgaard and K. H. Schatten, Solar Phys. 291, 2653 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 21-72-20067 (K.T. and E.I.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Tlatova.

Additional information

Translated by E. Seifina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tlatova, K.A., Vasil’eva, V.V., Berezin, I.A. et al. Influence of the Change in the Relative Number of Pores in Activity Cycles on the Reconstruction of the Sunspot Index. Astron. Rep. 66, 165–173 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772922030052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772922030052

Keywords:

Navigation