Astronomy Reports

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 288–298 | Cite as

Motion in a Central Field in the Presence of a Constant Perturbing Acceleration in a Coordinate System Comoving with the Velocity Vector

  • N. Batmunkh
  • T. N. Sannikova
  • K. V. Kholshevnikov


The motion of a zero-mass point under the action of gravitation toward a central body and a perturbing acceleration P is considered. The magnitude of P is taken to be small compared to the main acceleration due to the gravitation of the central body, and the components of the vector P are taken to be constant in a reference frame with its origin at the central body and its axes directed along the velocity vector, normal to the velocity vector in the plane of the osculating orbit, and along the binormal. The equations in the mean elements were obtained in an earlier study. The algorithm used to solve these equations is given in this study. This algorithm is analogous to one constructed earlier for the case when P is constant in a reference frame tied to the radius vector. The properties of the solutions are similar. The main difference is that, in the most important cases, the quadratures to which the solution reduces lead to non-elementary functions. However, they can be expressed as series in powers of the eccentricity e that converge for e < 1, and often also for e = 1.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. N. Sannikova and K. V. Kholshevnikov, Astron. Rep. 58, 945 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. N. Sannikova and K. V. Kholshevnikov, Astron. Rep. 59, 806 (2015).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. N. Sannikova, Vestn. SPb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mat. Mekh. Astron. 59 (1), 171 (2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. N. Bogolyubov and Yu. A. Mitropolsky, AsymptoticalMethods in the Theory of Non-Linear Oscillations (Gordon Breach, 1961; Fizmatlit,Moscow, 1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. V. Kholshevnikov, Asymptotic Methods of Celestial Mechanics (Leningr. Gos. Univ., Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. I. Akhiezer, Elements of the Theory of Elliptic Functions (Nauka, Fizmatlit, Moscow, 1970; Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1990).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. S. Gradshtein, I. M. Ryzhik, V. V. Maksimov, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products (BKhVPeterburg, St. Petersburg, 2011; Academic, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Gurvits, Theory of Analytic and Elliptic Functions (LENAND, Fizmat. Nasledie, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. M. Fikhtengol’ts, Course of Differential and Integral Calculus (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001), Vol. 2 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Tikhomandritskii, Theory of Elliptic Integrals and Elliptic Functions (Kniga po Trebovaniyu, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Batmunkh
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. N. Sannikova
    • 1
  • K. V. Kholshevnikov
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Astronomy and GeophysicsMongolian Academy of SciencesUlan-BatorMongolia
  3. 3.Institute of Applied AstronomyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations