Abstract
Although the calculation of the weighted mean of several individual values (one of the most frequently used operations in scientific analysis) is straightforward, the calculation of the corresponding uncertainty does not always receive the attention it requires. The application of methods of classical statistics to real observational data is often not justified, since the assumptions lying at the basis of these methods are not satisfied. The presence of systematic uncertainties in the averaged measurements and underestimation of the corresponding random errors used to define the weights are typical examples. A new approach to calculating the uncertainty of weighted mean based on a combination of known methods is considered. The proposed method makes it possible to automatically take into account both the random errors and scatter of the input data, making the method suitable for determining realistic errors for mean values in the case of observational data displaying both good and poor consistency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z. Malkin, arXiv:1110.6639 [physics.data-an] (2011).
Z. M. Malkin, Soobshch. Inst. Prikl. Astron. RAN, No. 137 (2001).
L. Rizzi, E. V. Held, I. Saviane, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, 1255 (2007); arXiv:0707.0521 (2007).
A. B. Kovačević, Mon. Not. R.Astron. Soc. 419, 2725 (2012); arXiv:1109.6455 (2011).
M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, and V. V. Flambaum, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 1053 (2008); arXiv:astroph/0612407 (2006).
K. Ando, T. Nagayama, T. Omodaka, et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 63, 45 (2011); arXiv:1012.5715 (2012).
A. H. Rosenfeld, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, W. J. Podolsky, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 1 (1967).
T. A. Agekyan, Principles of Error Theory for Astronomers and Physicists, 2nd ed. (Nauka, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].
S. Brandt, Data Analysis: Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 1999).
W. Bich, M. Cox, T. Estler, et al., Proposed guidelines for the evaluation of the key comparison data. http://www.bipm.org/cc/CCAUV/Allowed/3/CCAUV02-36.pdf
Z. M. Malkin, Astron. Rep. 57, 128 (2013).
J. Klačka, arXiv:0912.3112 [astro-ph.GA] (2009).
D. W. Smith, P. E. Johnson, W. L. Buckingham, and R. W. Shorthill, Icarus 99, 485 (1992).
V. V. Vityazev and A. S. Tsvetkov, Astron. Lett. 38, 411 (2012).
R. J. Bouwens, G. D. Illingworth, P. A. Oesch, et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 752, L5 (2012); arXiv:1105.2038 (2011).
A. M. Ritchey, S. R. Federman, and D. L. Lambert, Astrophys. J. 728, 36 (2011); e-Print arXiv:1012.1296 (2012).
J. Sayers, S. R. Golwala, S. Ameglio, and E. Pierpaoli, Astrophys. J. 728, 39 (2011); arXiv:1010.1798 (2010).
J. Sokolova and Z. Malkin, Astron. Astrophys. 474, 665 (2007).
Z. Malkin, in Measuring the Future, Ed. by A. Finkelstein and D. Behrend (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2008), p. 256; arXiv:0911.3124 (2009).
Z. M. Malkin, Astron. Rep. 55, 810 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Z.M. Malkin, 2013, published in Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, 2013, Vol. 90, No. 11, pp. 959–964.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malkin, Z.M. On the calculation of mean-weighted value in astronomy. Astron. Rep. 57, 882–887 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772913110048
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772913110048