Skip to main content
Log in

On noninvasive assessment of acoustic fields acting on the fetus

  • Acoustics of Animate Systems. Bioacoustics
  • Published:
Acoustical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to verify a noninvasive technique for assessing the characteristics of acoustic fields in the audible range arising in the uterus under the action of maternal voice, external sounds, and vibrations. This problem is very important in view of actively developed methods for delivery of external sounds to the uterus: music, maternal voice recordings, sounds from outside the mother’s body, etc., that supposedly support development of the fetus at the prenatal stage psychologically and cognitively. However, the parameters of acoustic signals have been neither measured nor normalized, which may be dangerous for the fetus and hinder actual assessment of their impact on fetal development. The authors show that at frequencies below 1 kHz, acoustic pressure in the uterus may be measured noninvasively using a hydrophone placed in a soft capsule filled with liquid. It was found that the acoustic field at frequencies up to 1 kHz arising in the uterus under the action of an external sound field has amplitude-frequency parameters close to those of the external field; i.e., the external field penetrates the uterus with hardly any difficulty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. A. Antonets, Akust. Zh. 35, 1118 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Korenbaum, A. A. Tagil’tsev, A. E. Kostiv, S. V. Gorovoi, I. A. Pochekutova, and G. N. Bondar’, Instrum. Exper. Tech. 51, 296 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Antonets, N. M. Anishkina, and A. P. Efimov, in Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics. No. 7. Biomechanics of Muscles and Structure of Motions (Novgorod, 1992), p. 23 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Antonets, A. L. Gribkov, and M. E. Shesternin, Biofizika 45, 1125 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Mansfel’d, A. V. Sokolov, and G. P. Volkov, Acoust. Phys. 57, 326 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fatemi, A. Alizad, and J. F. Greenleaf, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1448 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. O. V. Rudenko, S. N. Gurbatov, and I. Yu. Demin, Acoust. Phys. 59, 584 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. A. Gusev and O. V. Rudenko, Acoust. Phys. 59, 45 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. N. Graven and J. V. Browne, Newborn Infant Nursing Rev. 8, 187 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. de Casper and W. P. Fifer, Science, 208, 499 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ch. Moon, H. Lagercrantz, and P. K. Kuhl, Acta Paediatrica 102, 156 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Partanen, T. Kujala, R. Näätänena, A. Liitolaa, A. Sambethf, and M. Huotilainena, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15145 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. R. Van de Carr and M. Lehrer, Pre- and Perinatal Psychol. J., No. 1, 20 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. B. Chamberlain. http://birthpsychology.com/free-article/prenatal-stimulation-experimental-results

  15. M. L. Lazarev and E. Grigor’eva, Sem’ya i shkola, No. 3, 14 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. L. Lazarev, Mamalysh or Birth before Birth (Kodeks, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Instruction of Ministry of Public Health Russ. Feder. No. 13-03/10-279 from 30.09.1996.

  18. N. Alleyn, USA Patent No. 6718044 B1 (2001).

  19. M. Fatemi, P. L. Ogburn, and J. F. Greenleaf, J. Ultrasound Med. 20, 883 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasonics, 2nd ed., Ed. by C. R. Hill, J. C. Bamber, and G. R. ter Haar, (Wiley, Chichester, England, 2004; Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. K. Griffiths, W. S. Brown, Jr., K. J. Gerhardt, R. M. Abrams, and R. J. Morris, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2055 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J.-P. Lecanuet, B. Gautheron, A. Locatelli, B. Schaal, A.-Y. Jacquet, and M.-C. Busnel, Dev. Psychobiology 33, 203 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. R. Skovoroda, Elasticity Theory Tasks in Problem of Diagnostics of Soft Biological Material Pathology (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. J. Spence and M. S. Freeman, Infant Behavior and Development, No. 19, 199 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Brewer, Super Baby: Boost Your Baby’s Potential from Conception to Year 1 (Thorsons/HarperCollins, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Antonets.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Antonets, V.V. Kazakov, 2014, published in Akusticheskii Zhurnal, 2014, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 320–326.

The article was translated by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antonets, V.A., Kazakov, V.V. On noninvasive assessment of acoustic fields acting on the fetus. Acoust. Phys. 60, 342–347 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771014030026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771014030026

Keywords

Navigation