Abstract
The paper presents the acoustics analysis of three different enclosed spaces. These spaces (rooms) have different geometrical shapes and sizes and serve for different purposes. The early decay time, reverberation time, clarity and center time are evaluated with Dirac, WinMLS, Aurora and Caracad software using simple, low-cost equipment. The listed acoustic parameters were determined using linear sine sweep and impulsive sources. Comparisons between experimental measurements, simulations and analytic results were done. The room impulse response measurement proved to be the most reliable method to evaluate the properties of different rooms even if the measurements are perturbed by non-idealities of the low-cost equipment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Kuttruff, Room Acoustics (Spon Press, London, UK, 2009), p. 109.
F. A. Everest, Master Handbook of Acoustics, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, Two Penn Plaza, New York, 2001), p. 54.
M. Kahrs and K. Brandenburg, Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (Kluwer Acad., Norwell, MA, 1998), pp. 89–100.
ISO 3382, Acoustics—Measurement of the Reverberation Time of Rooms with Reference to Other Acoustical Parameters (Intern. Organization for Standardization, 1997).
A. Farina, in Proceedings of the 23rd Nordic Sound Symposium Training and Information Seminar for Audio People, 27–30 Sept. 2007, pp. 1–31, http://pcfarina.eng.unipr. it/Public/Papers/238-NordicSound2007.pdf.
R. Stewart and M. Sandler, in Proceedings of the 10th Intern. Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-07), Bordeaux, France, Sept. 10–15, 2007, pp. 59–62, http://dafx.labri.fr/main/dafx07-proc.pdf.
M. Holters, T. Corbach, and U. Zólzer, in Proceedings of the 12th Intern. Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-09), Como, Italy, Sept. 1–4, 2009, pp. 1–5, http://dafx09.como.polimi.it/proceedings/data/DAFx09-Proceedings.pdf.
M. R. Schroeder, Acoust. Phys. 49, 97 (2003).
A. Pompei, M. A. Sumbatyan, and N. F. Todorov, Acous. Phys. 55, 821 (2009).
M. Yu. Lannie and V. N. Sukhov, Acoust. Phys. 47, 623 (2001).
S. Cedra, A. Gimenez, J. Romero, R. Cibrian, and J. L. Miralles, Appl. Acoust. 70, 97 (2009).
P. Fausti and A. Farina, J. Sound Vibrat. 232, 213 (2000).
N. Toma, M. D. opa, I. Muresan, B. S. Kirei, M. Neag, and A. Fazakas, Acta Tehn. Napocensis: Electron. Telecommun. 50(2) (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ţopa, M.D., Toma, N., Kirei, B.S. et al. Comparison of different experimental methods for the assessment of the room’s acoustics. Acoust. Phys. 57, 199–207 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771011020229
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771011020229