Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative characterization of surface roughness of sylvite, spathic salt and carnallite gains in nanorange

  • Geomechanics
  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The article considers statistical properties of surfaces of sylvite, spathic salt and carnallite grains in nanorange. The authors describe processed experimental data obtained on scanning microprobe Dimension ICON in nanorange for grains of the Upper Kama potassium and potash-magnesium rock salts. Fractal dimension determined by minimum cover method is used as a characteristic of the grain surface roughness. The authors find differences in statistic properties of one-dimension divergent cuts of the grain surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuznetsov, P.V., Petrakova, I.V., and Shraiber, Yu., Fractal Dimension as a Characteristic of Fatigue of Metal Crystals, Fiz. Mezomekh., 2004, vol. 7, no. 1 (Special Issue).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aptukov, V.N., Mitin, V.Yu. and Skachkov, A.P., Analysis of Surface Micro-Relief of Sylvite Using the Hurst Method, Vest. Perm. Un-ta: Matem. Mekhan. Inform., 2010, issue 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aptukov, V.N., Konstantinova, S.A., Mitin, V.Yu., and Skachkov, A.P., Nano- and Micro-Range Mechanical Characteristics of Sylvite Grain, Journal of Mining Science, 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubovikov, M.M., Kryanev, A.V., and Starchenko, N.V., Minimum Cover Dimension and Local Analysis of Fractal Time Series, Vest. RUDN, 2004, vol. 3, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feder, J., Fractals, New York: Plenum Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mandelbrot, B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature, 1st Edition, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hausdorff, F., Dimension und Ausseres Mass, Matematishe Annalen, 1919, no. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gallant, J.C., Moore, I.D., Hutchinson, M.F., and Gessler, P., Estimating Fractal Dimension of Profiles: A Comparison of Methods, Mathematical Geology, 1994, vol. 265, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gneiting, T., Sevcikova, H., and Percival, D., Estimator of Fractal Dimension: Assessing the Roughness of Time Series and Spatial Data, arXiv: 1101.1444v1 [stat. ME] 7 Jan 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.N. Aptukov, V.Yu. Mitin, 2013, published in Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, 2013, No. 1, pp. 51–60.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aptukov, V.N., Mitin, V.Y. Comparative characterization of surface roughness of sylvite, spathic salt and carnallite gains in nanorange. J Min Sci 49, 44–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739149010061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739149010061

Key words

Navigation