The physical-and-mathematical model is presented for generation of microseismic events during hydrofracture propagation. Defects (discontinuities) are described using the ESC-model. The formulas are given for the jumps of discontinuities, characteristics of seismic and aseismic events, as well as the seismic moment and seismic magnitude. The algorithm is developed to model microseismic events during hydrofracture propagation by the known geometry and physical properties of the medium as the input data. The calculations are performed for the pseudo-3D and planar models of hydrofracture propagation. It is shown that a majority of events take place at the front of the growing hydrofracture, which agrees with the observations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Osiptsov, A.A., Models of Multiphase Media Mechanics for Hydraulic Fracturing Technology, Doctor Phys.-Math. Sci. Thesis, Moscow, 2017.
Mishuris, G., Wrobel, M., and Linkov, A., On Modeling Hydraulic Fracture in Proper Variables: Stiffness, Accuracy, Sensitivity, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2012, vol. 61, pp. 10–23.
Linkov, A.M., Key-Note Lecture: Numerical Modeling of Seismicity: Theory and Applications, Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Proc. of the 8th Int. Symp. RaSiM, Geophysical Survey of RAS, Mining Institute of Ural Branch of RAS, Obninsk-Perm, 2013.
Aki, K., and Richards, P.G., Quantitative Seismology, University Sci. Books, Sausalito, CA, 2002.
Gibowicz, S.J. and Kijko, A., An Introduction to Mining Seismology, Acad. Press, San Diego, 2013.
Mendecki, A.J., Seismic Monitoring in Mines, Chapman and Hall, London, 1997.
Rice, J.R., The Mechanics of Earthquake Rupture, Physics of the Earth’s Interior, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.
Rasskazov, I.Yu., Tsirel’, S.V., Rozanov, A.O., Tereshkin, A.A., and Glazyr, A.V., Application of Acoustic Measurement Data to Characterize Initiation and Development of Disintegration Focus in a Rock Mass, J. Min. Sci., 2017, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 224–231.
Dobroskok, A.A. and Linkov, A.M., Modeling of Fluid Flow, Sterss State and Seismicity Induced in Rock by an Instant Pressure Drop in a Hydrofracture, J. Min. Sci., 2011, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 10–19.
Yaskevich, S.V., Grechka, V.Yu., and Duchkov, A. A., Processing Microseismic Monitoring Data Considering Seismic Anisotropy of Rocks, J. Min. Sci., 2015, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 477–486.
Guglielmi, A.V., Interpretation of the Omori Law, Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2016, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 785–786.
Linkov, A.M., Key-Note Address: New Geomechanical Approaches to Develop Quantitative Seismicity, Proc. of the 4thInt. Symp. on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1997.
Linkov, A.M., Numerical Modeling of Seismic and Aseismic Events in Three-Dimensional Problems of Rock Mechanics, J. Min. Sci., 2006, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–14.
Linkov, A.M., Kompleksnyi metod granichnykh integralnykh uravneniy teorii uprugosti (Complex Method of Boundary Integral Equations of Elasticity Theory), Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 1999.
Linkov, A.M., Zubkov, V.V., and Kheib, M.A., A Method of Solving Three-Dimensional Problems of Seam Workings and Geological Faults, J. Min. Sci., 1997, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 295–315.
Linkov, A.M., Dynamic Phenomena in Mines and the Problem of Stability, Int. Soc. Rock Mechanics, Lisboa, Cedex, Portugal, 1994.
Linkov, A.M., Integration of Numerical Modeling and Seismic Monitoring: General Theory and First Steps, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on New Developments in Rock Mechanics, New York, 2002.
Grechka, V.Yu. and Heigl, W.M., Microseismic Monitoring, Soc. Exploration Geophysi., 2017.
Maxwell, S., Microseismic Imaging of Hydraulic Fracturing: Improved Engineering of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs, Soc. Exploration Geophys., 2014.
Salamon, M.D.G., Keynote Address: Some Applications of Geomechanical Modelling in Rockburst and Related Research, Proc. of the 3rd Int. Symp. on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1993.
Markov, N.S. and Linkov, A.M., Correspondence Principle for Simulation Hydraulic Fractures by Using Pseudo 3D Model, Materials Physics and Mechanics, 2018, no. 40, pp. 181–186.
Starobinsky, E.B. and Stepanov, A.D., Using an Explicit Time Integration Scheme for Modeling Hydraulic Fracturing with the Planar 3D Model, PROneft, 2019, no. 2, pp. 15–19.
Khasanov, M.M., Paderin, G.V., Shel’, E.V., Yakovlev, A.A., and Pustovskikh, A.A., Approaches to Hydraulic Fracturing Modeling and Tendency, Neft. Khoz., 2017, no. 12, pp. 37–41.
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in the framework of Federal Target Program on R&D in priority areas for the development of the science and technology sector of Russia for 2014–2020, Measure 1.2, Agreement no. 14.575.21.0146 dated 09.26.2017, Unique Identifier PNI: RFMEFI57517X0146.
Russian Text © The Author(s), 2019, published in Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, 2019, No. 5, pp. 63–78.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shvarev, N.G., Markov, N.S. The Method to Model Microseismic Events during Hydrofracture Propagation. J Min Sci 55, 751–764 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739119056124
- microseismic activity
- microseismic events
- hydraulic fracturing