Journal of Mining Science

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 559–564 | Cite as

Evaluation of Additional Iron Recovery from Iron Ore Tailings

  • E. K. Yakubailik
  • A. D. Balaev
  • I. M. Ganzhenko
Mineral Dressing


The article demonstrates feasibility of additional iron recovery from the secondary kind of mineral raw materials—dry magnetic separation tailings obtained at crushing and processing factories of Abaza and Irba and wet magnetic separation tailing produced at Abagur processing plant of Evrazruda. Dry centrifugal separation treatment of Abaza tailings–3 mm in size allowed 6.3% of middlings with Fetotal and Femag contents of 40.4 and 32%, respectively; the result of dry magnetic separation of Irba tailings -5 mm in size is 7.7% middlings with the content of Fetotal and Femag 39.9 and 30.8%. Wet magnetic separation of Abagur tailings -0.007 mm in size allowed recovery of 0.6 to 1.45% of magnetic fraction with Fetotal content of 53.3 and 51.6%, respectively, and Femag content of 49.8 and 48.5%. Fitting of modern separators with the magnetic systems based on neodymium–ferrum–boron considerably improves output of the machines (in dry centrifugal separation circuit) and enhances the yield of magnetic product in wet separation of tailings.


Tailings dry centrifugal separation wet separation magnetic characteristics neodymium–ferrum–boron 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Filippov, P.A., The Potential of Technogenic Formations in Mines of the West Siberia, J. Min. Sci., 2008, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novikov, N.I., Kilin, V.I., and Matveev, Yu.G., Utilization of Iron Ore Tailings at Evrazruda Plants to Produce Rough Concentrate, Construction Materials and Consumer Goods, Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Nonferrous Metals-2010, Krasnoyarsk, 2010, pp. 762–765.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Filippov, P.A. and Uskov, V.A., Technique to Process Waste Iron Ore Materials, Proc. 7th Cong. CIS Mineral Processing Professionals, Moscow: MISiS, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kilin, V.I. and Yakubailik, E.K., Investigation into Magnetic Properties and Processes of Separation of Abakan Magnetites, J. Min. Sci., 2002, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 506–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lomovtsev, L.A., Nesterova, N.A., and Drobchenko, L.A., Magnitnoe obogashchenie sil’nomagnitnykh rud (Magnetic Treatment of Strong Magnetic Ores), Moscow: Nedra, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bikbov, A.A. and Kryukovskaya, L.V., Magnetic Properties of Some Magnetite Middlings, Obog. Rud, 1974, no. 5, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Derkach, V.G., Dry Magnetic Treatment on High-Speed Drum Separators, Obog. Rud, 1963, no. 4, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sentemova, V.A., Centrifugal Magnetic Separation Upgrading of Magnetite Concentrates, Obog. Rud, 1970, nos. 1, 2, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karmazin, V.V., Elektricheskie i magnitnye metody separatsii (Electric and Magnetic Separation Processes), Moscow: Nauka, 1966, pp. 58–67.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kilin, V.I., Ganzhenko, I.M., and Yakubailik, E.K., Separation of Iron Ore Agglomerate from Rough Magnetite Concentrates of Dry Centrifugal Separation, Izv. Vuzov. Cher. Metal., 2007, no. 6, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikolaev, S.B., Yakubailik, E.K., and Soloviev, I.V., Centrifugal Separation Recleaning of Irba Magnetite Products, Izv. Vuzov. Cher. Metal., 2008, no. 8, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balaev, A.D., Boyarshinov, Yu.V., and Khrustalev, B.P., Automated Magnetometer with Superconducting Solenoid, Technical Exploitation Rules, 1985, vol. 3, pp. 167–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. K. Yakubailik
    • 1
  • A. D. Balaev
    • 1
  • I. M. Ganzhenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Kirensky Institute of Physics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Kondomskoe shosse 39NovokuznetskRussia

Personalised recommendations