Journal of Mining Science

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 965–973 | Cite as

Determination of activity/selectivity ratio in physical and chemical adsorption of a reagent

  • S. A. Kondrat’ev
  • N. P. Moshkin
  • E. A. Burdakova
Mineral Dressing
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Under discussion is the particle and bubble interaction in froth flotation. Water flow from an interlayer between a particle and a gas bubble under effect of hydrophobic component of wedging pressure is studied. It is assumed for a mineral to be extracted, that electrostatic interaction slightly influences the particle and bubble contingence and the liquid interlayer thinning. For this reason, particular attention is given to the effect exerted by mineral particle surface hydrophobicity on water flow rate from the interlayer. It is found that water flow rate under influence of hydrophobic component of wedging pressure is less than water flow rate under physical adsorption of a reagent. The authors hypothesize that hydrophobization creates areas on the mineral particle surface, where the reagent species active relative to gas–water interface attach in accordance with the polarity equalizing rule. Physically adsorbed reagent species pull out water from the interlayer after the interlayer rupture and, thus, remove the kinetic constraint of the particle–bubble attachment.

Keywords

Flotation hydrophobicity mineral particles physical and chemical adsorption wedging pressure selectivity liquid interlayer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frumkin, A. and Gorodetskaya, A, On Wetting and Adhesion of Bubbles, Part II, Mechanism for Bubble Adhesion to Mercury Surface, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1938, vol. 12, nos. 5–6, pp. 511–520.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chanturia, V.A., Role of Electrochemical and Semiconductive Properties of Minerals in Flotation, Fizikokhimicheskie osnovy teorii flotatsii (Physicochemical Fundamentals of Flotation), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmed, S.M, Electrochemical Studies of Sulphides, I. The Electrocatalytic Activity of Galena, Pyrite and Cobalt Sulphide for Oxygen Reduction in Relation to Xanthate Adsorption and Flotation, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1998, vol. 5, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirjavainen, V., Schreithofer, N., and Heiskanen, K, Effect of Some Process Variable on Floatability of Sulfide Nickel Ores, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2002, vol. 65, pp. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abramov, A.A, Requirements for Selection and Design of Selective Collecting Agents, Part II: Requirements for Physical-Chemical Properties of a Collecting Agent, Tsv. Metal., 2012, no. 5, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kondrat’ev, S.A. and Moshkin, N.P, Estimate of Collecting Force of Flotation Agent, J. Min. Sci., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao, H.K. and Forssberg, K.S.E, Mechanism of Fatty Acid Adsorption in Salt-Type Mineral Flotation, Miner. Engin., 1991, vol. 4, nos. 7–11, pp. 879–890.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuerstenau, D.W., A Century of Developments in the Chemistry of Flotation Processing, Centenary of Flotation Symposium, Brisbane, Australia: 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Free, M.L. and Miller, J.D, The Significance of Collector Colloid Adsorption Phenomena in the Fluorite/Oleate Flotation System as Revealed by FTIR/IRS and Solution Chemistry Analysis, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1996, vol. 48, pp. 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takeda, S. and Usui, S., Adsorption of Dodecylammonium Ion on Quartz in Relation to its Flotation, Colloids and Surfaces, 1987, vol. 23, issues 1-2, pp. 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kondrat’ev, S.A., Moshkin, N.P., and Burdakova, E.A, Optimized Activity Ratio for Different Types of Reagent Attachment at Sulfide Minerals, J. Min. Sci., 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1021–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Churaev, N.V, Hydrophobic Attraction Forces in Wetting Films of Aqueous Solutions, Kolloid. Zh., 1992, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 169–173.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Churaev, N.V, Surface Forces and Surface Physicochemistry, Uspekhi Khimii, 2004, vol. 73, no. 1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crozier R. D. Sulphide Collector Mineral Bonding and the Mechanism of Flotation, Miner. Engin., 1991, vol. 4, nos. 7–11, pp. 839–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deryagin, B.V, Theory of Capillary Condensation and Other Capillary Phenomena with Allowance for Wedging Effect of Polymolecular Liquid Films, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1940, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 137–147.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Starov, V.M. and Churaev N.V, Kinetics of Variations in Wetting Films, Kolloid. Zh., 1975, vol. 37, no. 4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Radoev, B.P., Dimitrov, D.S., and Ivanov, I.B, Hydrodynamics of Thin Liquid Films Effect of the Surfactant on the Rate of Thinning, Colloid and Polymer Sci., 1974, vol. 252, issue 1, pp. 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dimitrov, D.S. and Ivanov, I.B, Hydrodynamics of Thin Liquid Films. On the Rate of Thinning of Microscopic Films with Deformable Interface, J. colloid and Interface Sci., 1978, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pugh, R. and Stenius, P, Solution Chemistry Studies and Flotation Behavior of Apatite, Calcite and Fluorite Minerals with Sodium Oleate Collector, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1985, vol. 15, pp. 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, X-H., Forssberg, K.S.E, Mechanisms of Pyrite Flotation with Xanthates, Int. J. Miner. Process., 1991, vol. 33, pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Kondrat’ev
    • 1
  • N. P. Moshkin
    • 2
  • E. A. Burdakova
    • 1
  1. 1.Chinakal Institute of Mining, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Lavrentiev Institute of Hydrodynamics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations