Skip to main content
Log in

Guidelines to design the scope of a geotechnical risk assessment for underground mines

  • Mineral Mining Technology
  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

Risk assessment has been seen as an important tool in reducing accidents. Use of risk assessment tools also has its significant presence in the underground mining industry in preventing work related hazards. Geotechnical uncertainty however is among the leading cause behind major accidents such as roof collapse, airblast etc., which leads to multiple fatalities and financial loss. Geotechnical risk assessment done at stages as early as mine design can help justify a different mine design aspect such as support methods for a risky area different from the rest of the mine. The aim of this paper is to organize the geotechnical risk assessment process to suit the underground mining needs. A numerical ranking system has been developed to plan the risk assessment process and choose amongst the risk assessment tools. The risk assessment process has been redefined into four sections namely — hazard identification tool, risk assessment approaches, risk assessment parameters and risk representation tool. Risk identification tools have been shortlisted to suit underground mining needs through literature review. Risk assessment approaches have been defined into deterministic, probabilistic and possibilistic approaches with relevance to geotechnical assessment. Elements to be considered in an underground mine for a geotechnical risk assessment have been structured into classes. Establishment of scope of a geotechnical risk assessment based on these classes has been explained. Selection guideline for the appropriate risk identification tool has been defined based on the scope of risk assessment. The significance of the risk assessment approach has been explained and a numerical ranking system has been formulated which can be used by an underground mine to choose among the probabilistic, possibilistic and deterministic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crawford, R.L., European Oil Industry Guideline for Risk-Based Assessment of Contaminated Sites, CONCAWE Water Quality Management Group, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joy, J., Mineral Industries Risk Management (MIRM) Framework, Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre Web site, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Risk Assessment Workbook for Mines, NSW Government—Mine Safety Operations, 2009.

  4. Iannacchione, A., Varley, F., and Brady, T., The Application of Major Hazard Risk Assessment (MHRA) to Eliminate Multiple Fatality Occurrences in the US Minerals Industry, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Spokane, WA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts, C.E., Report on the Upper Big Branch Mine Disaster [Online]. Available: http://www.umwa.org/files/documents/134344-Upper-Big-Branch.pdf.

  6. Robertson, A. and Shaw, S., Risk Management for Major Geotechnical Structures on Mines, Proceedings of Computer Application in the Mineral Industry, Calgary, Alberta, CA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iverson, S., Kerkering, J.C., and Coleman, P., Using Fault Tree Analysis to Focus Mine Safety Research, A Mining Odyssey—SME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iannacchione, A.T., Prosser, L.J., Esterhuizen, G., and Bajpayee, T.S., Assessing Roof Fall Hazards for Underground Stone Mines: A Proposed Methodology, SME Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mathews, K.E., Hoek, D.C., Wyllie, D.C., and Stewart, S,B.V., Prediction of Stable Excavation Spans for Mining at Depths below 1000 Metres in Hard Rock—Report to Canada Centre for Mining and Energy Technology (CANMET), Department of Energy and Resources, Ottowa, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Victoria Government, Accident Compensation Act 1985, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blumenstein, D., Ferriter, R., Powers, J., and Reiher, M., Accidents —The Total Cost: A Guide for Estimating Total Costs of Accidents, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ball, D.J. and Floyd, P.J., Societal Risks, Final Report, Health and Safety Executive, United Kingdom, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Mishra.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, R.K., Rinne, M. Guidelines to design the scope of a geotechnical risk assessment for underground mines. J Min Sci 50, 745–756 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739114040152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739114040152

Keywords

Navigation