Abstract
The hypothesis about whole-genome duplications as the most important driver of transformation of the structure plan and lifestyle of vertebrates at the early stages of their evolution is generally accepted today. At the same time, details such as the timing and mechanisms of these duplications still remain controversial. Research into issues of periodization, number, and in which evolutionary lineages rounds of whole-genome and/or local duplications occurred in vertebrates continues as methodology and technical capabilities develop. The role of high-throughput genomic sequencing and big data analysis is increasing, which makes it possible to identify and track the history of not only individual genes or their families but of large sections of the genome, including at the chromosomal level. New opportunities allow for considering the problem at the macro level and conduct a comparative analysis of the genomic characteristics of representatives of different evolutionary groups. In this article, which is a logical continuation of an earlier review article (in 2020), the authors make an attempt to review and summarize the data of recent years, largely related to the sequencing of genomes of representatives of evolutionarily ancient (basal) groups of vertebrates and to understand the contribution of this new information to our ideas about the early evolutionary history of the vertebrate genotype. According to new data, the divergence and observed significant differences in the morphological plans of the two evolutionary lineages of vertebrates could be ensured by different scenarios of polyploidization of their genomes.
REFERENCES
Aase-Remedios, M.E. and Ferrier, D.E.K., Improved understanding of the role of gene and genome duplications in chordate evolution with new genome and transcriptome sequences, Front. Ecol. Evol., 2021, vol. 9, p. 703163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.703163
Bayramov, A.V., Ermakova, G.V., Kuchryavyy, A.V., et al., Genome duplications as the basis of vertebrates’ evolutionary success, Russ. J. Dev. Biol., 2021, vol. 52, pp. 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360421030024
Bi, X., Wang, K., Yang, L., et al., Tracing the genetic footprints of vertebrate landing in non-teleost ray-finned fishes, Cell, 2021, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 1377–1391. e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.046
Braasch, I. and Schartl, M., Evolution of endothelin receptors in vertebrates, Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 2014, vol. 209, pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.06.028
Cardoso, J.C.R., Bergqvist, C.A., Felix, R.C., et al., Corticotropin-releasing hormone family evolution: five ancestral genes remain in some lineages, J. Mol. Endocrinol., 2016, vol. 57, pp. 73–86.
Chen, Z., Omori, Y., Koren, S., et al., Comparative Sequencing Program, Mullikin, J.C., and Burgess, S.M., De novo assembly of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) genome and the evolution of genes after whole-genome duplication, Sci. Adv., 2019, vol. 5, no. 6, p. eaav0547. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav0547
Cheng, P., Huang, Y., Lv, Y., et al., The American paddlefish genome provides novel insights into chromosomal evolution and bone mineralization in early vertebrates, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2021, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa326
David, K.T., Global gradients in the distribution of animal polyploids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2022, vol. 119, no. 48, p. e2214070119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214070119
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Chourrout, D., et al., Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates, Nature, 2006, vol. 439, no. 7079, pp. 965–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04336
Du, K., Stöck, M., Kneitz, S., et al., The sterlet sturgeon genome sequence and the mechanisms of segmental rediploidization, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2020, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1166-x
Ermakova, G.V., Kucheryavyy, A.V., Zaraisky, A.G., et al., Discovery of four noggin genes in lampreys suggests two rounds of ancient genome duplication, Commun. Biol., 2020, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01234-3
Fontana, F., Congiu, L., Mudrak, V.A., et al., Evidence of hexaploid karyotype in shortnose sturgeon, Genome, 2008, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1139/g07-112
Hess, J.E., Smith, J.J., Timoshevskaya, N., et al., Genomic islands of divergence infer a phenotypic landscape in pacific lamprey, Mol. Ecol., 2020, vol. 29, pp. 3841–3856. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15605
Huang, Z., Xu, L., Cai, C., et al., Three amphioxus reference genomes reveal gene and chromosome evolution of chordates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2023, vol. 120, no. 10, p. e2201504120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201504120
Ikuta, T. and Saiga, H., Organization of Hox genes in ascidians: present, past, and future, Dev. Dyn., 2005, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20374
Janvier, P., The phylogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil “agnathans,” J. Vertebr. Paleontol., 1981, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 121–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4522845
Kuraku, S. and Kuratani, S., Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences, Zool. Sci., 2006, vol. 23, pp. 1053–1064.
Lakiza, O., Miller, S., Bunce, A., et al., SoxE gene duplication and development of the lamprey branchial skeleton: Insights into development and evolution of the neural crest, Dev. Biol., 2011, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.08.012
Li, J.T., Wang, Q., Huang Yang, M.D., et al., Parallel subgenome structure and divergent expression evolution of allo-tetraploid common carp and goldfish, Nat. Genet., 2021, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00933-9
Mallik, R., Carlson, K.B., Wcisel, D.J., et al., A chromosome-level genome assembly of longnose gar, Lepisosteus osseus, G3 (Bethesda), 2023, vol. 13, no. 7, p. jkad095. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkad095
Marlétaz, F., Timoshevskaya, N., Timoshevskiy, V., et al., The hagfish genome and the evolution of vertebrates, bioRxiv, 2023a, vol. 18, p. 2023.04.17.537254. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.17.537254
Marlétaz, F., de la Calle-Mustienes, E., Acemel, R.D., et al., The little skate genome and the evolutionary emergence of wing-like fins, Nature, 2023b, vol. 616, no. 7957, pp. 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05868-1
Marra, N.J., Stanhope, M.J., Jue, N.K., et al., White shark genome reveals ancient elasmobranch adaptations associated with wound healing and the maintenance of genome stability, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2019, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 4446–4455. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819778116
Mehta, T.K., Ravi, V., Yamasaki, S., et al., Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, vol. 110, no. 40, pp. 16044–16049. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315760110
Meulemans, D. and Bronner-Fraser, M., Insights from amphioxus into the evolution of vertebrate cartilage, PLoS One, 2007, vol. 2, no. 8, p. e787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000787
Miyashita, T., Coates, M.I., Farrar, R., et al., Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological-molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2019, vol. 116, no. 6, p. 2146–2151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814794116
Nakatani, Y. and McLysaght, A., Genomes as documents of evolutionary history: a probabilistic macrosynteny model for the reconstruction of ancestral genomes, Bioinformatics, 2017, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. i369–i378. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx259
Nakatani, Y., Shingate, P., Ravi, V., et al., Reconstruction of proto-vertebrate, protocyclostome and proto-gnathostome genomes provides new insights into early vertebrate evolution, Nat. Commun., 2021, vol. 12, p. 4489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24573-z
Nishimura, O., Yamaguchi, K., Hara, Y., et al., Inference of a genome-wide protein-coding gene set of the inshore hagfish Eptatretus burger, F1000Research, 2022a, vol. 11, p. 1270. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124719
Nishimura, O., Rozewicki, J., Yamaguchi, K., et al., Squalomix: shark and ray genome analysis consortium and its data sharing platform, F1000Research, 2022b, vol. 11, p. 1077. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123591.1
Ota, K., Fujimoto, S., Oisi, Y., et al., Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish, Nat. Commun., 2011, vol. 2, p. 373. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1355
Parker, H.J., Bronner, M.E., and Krumlauf, R., An atlas of anterior Hox gene expression in the embryonic sea lamprey head: Hox-code evolution in vertebrates, Dev. Biol., 2019, vol. 453, no. 1, pp. 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.05.001
Putnam, N.H., Butts, T., Ferrier, D.E., et al., The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype, Nature, 2008, vol. 453, pp. 1064–1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06967
Ray, L. and Medeiros, D., Linking vertebrate gene duplications to the new head hypothesis, Biology, 2023, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091213
Redmond, A.K., Casey, D., Gundappa, M.K., et al., Independent rediploidization masks shared whole genome duplication in the sturgeon-paddlefish ancestor, Nat. Commun., 2023, vol. 14, p. 2879. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38714-z
Robertson, F.M., Gundappa, M.K., Grammes, F., et al., Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification, Genome Biol., 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1241-z
Rothstein, M., Bhattacharya, D., and Simoes-Costa, M., The molecular basis of neural crest axial identity, Dev. Biol., 2018, vol. 444, suppl. 1, pp. S170–S180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.07.026
Sacerdot, C., Louis, A., Bon, C., et al., Chromosome evolution at the origin of the ancestral vertebrate genome, Genome Biol., 2018, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1559-1
Session, A.M., Uno, Y., Kwon, T., et al., Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis, Nature, 2016, vol. 538, no. 7625, pp. 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19840
Shimeld, S.M. and Donoghue, P.C.J., Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish), Development, 2012, vol. 139, pp. 2091–2099. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.074716
Simakov, O., Marlétaz, F., Yue, J.X., et al., Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2020, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z
Smith, J.J., Kuraku, S., Holt, C., et al., Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution, Nat. Genet., 2013, vol. 45, pp. 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2568
Smith, J.J., Timoshevskaya, N., Ye, C., et al., The sea lamprey germline genome provides insights into programmed genome rearrangement and vertebrate evolution, Nat. Genet., 2018, vol. 50, pp. 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-017-0036-1
Song, X., Tang, Y., and Wang, Y., Genesis of the vertebrate FoxP subfamily member genes occurred during two ancestral whole genome duplication events, Gene, 2016, vol. 588, no. 2, pp. 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.05.019
Soshnikova, N., Dewaele, R., Janvier, P., et al., Duplications of hox gene clusters and the emergence of vertebrates, Dev. Biol., 2013, vol. 378, no. 2, pp. 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.03.004
Square, T.A., Jandzik, D., Massey, J.L., et al., Evolution of the endothelin pathway drove neural crest cell diversification, Nature, 2020, vol. 585, pp. 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2720-z
Tai, A., Cheung, M., Huang, Y.H., et al., SOXE neofunctionalization and elaboration of the neural crest during chordate evolution, Sci. Rep., 2016, vol. 6, p. 34964. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34964
Thompson, A.W., Hawkins, M.B., Parey, E., et al., The bowfin genome illuminates the developmental evolution of ray-finned fishes, Nat. Genet., 2021, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00914-y
Timoshevskaya, N., Eşkut, K.I., Timoshevskiy, V.A., et al., An improved germline genome assembly for the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus illuminates the evolution of germline-specific chromosomes, Cell Rep., 2023, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 112263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112263
Timoshevskiy, V.A., Timoshevskaya, N.Y., and Smith, J.J., Germline-specific repetitive elements in programmatically eliminated chromosomes of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), Genes, 2019, vol. 10, p. 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100832
Wertheim, B., Beukeboom, L.W., and van de Zande, L., Polyploidy in animals: effects of gene expression on sex determination, evolution and ecology, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2013, vol. 140, nos. 2–4, pp. 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351998
Yamaguchi, K., Uno, Y., Kadota, M., et al., Elasmobranch genome sequencing reveals evolutionary trends of vertebrate karyotypic organization, Genome Res., 2023, p. gr.276840.122. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.276840.122
Yu, D., Ren, Y., Uesaka, M., et al., Hagfish genome illuminates vertebrate whole genome duplications and their evolutionary consequences, bioRxiv, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.08.536076
Zhu, T., Li, Y., Pang, Y., et al., Chromosome-level genome assembly of Lethenteron reissneri provides insights into lamprey evolution, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2021, vol. 21, pp. 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13279
Funding
The research was carried out and the publication was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 23-74-30005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
This work does not contain any studies involving human and animal subjects.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bayramov, A.V., Ermakova, G.V. & Zaraisky, A.G. Reconstruction of Ancestral Genomes as a Key to Understanding the Early Evolution of Vertebrate Genotype. Russ J Dev Biol 54 (Suppl 1), S1–S9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360423070020
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360423070020