Biology Bulletin

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 179–185 | Cite as

The Effect of Reciprocal Cross-Fostering of Pups in Two Species of Mice Mus musculus and Mus spicilegus: An Altered Response to Con- and Heterospecific Odors

  • E. V. Kotenkova
  • A. V. Ambaryan
  • A. N. Maltsev
Zoology
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of pup cross-fostering by the house mouse Mus musculus and the mound-building mouse M. spicilegus on the odor preferences of sexually mature individuals has been studied for the first time. House and mound-building mice reared by females of a closely related species did not prefer any of the odors, in contrast to intact individuals of these species. Some individuals reared by females of a closely related species preferred the odor of foster species to conspecific odor. Early olfactory experience has been shown to alter the response of house mice and mound-building mice to odors of their own species and foster species.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Doty, R.L., Methods for determining odor preferences in nonhuman mammals, in Handbook of Olfaction and Gestation, Doty, R.L., Ed., New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2003, pp. 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Udine, B. and Alleva, E., Early experience and sexual preferences in rodents, in Mate Choice, Bateson, P.P.G., Ed., Cambridge: Cambr. Univ. Press, 1983, pp. 311–326.Google Scholar
  3. Heth, G., Todrank, J., Busquet, N., and Baudoin, C., Odour-genes covariance and differential investigation of individual odours in the Mus species complex, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2001, vol. 73, pp. 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnston, R.E., Attraction to odors in hamsters: an evaluation of methods, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1981, vol. 95, pp. 951–960.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kirchhof-Glazier, D.A., Absence of sexual imprinting in house mice cross-fostered to deer mice, Physiol. Behav., 1979, vol. 23, pp. 1073–1080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirshenblat, L.D., Obshchaya endokrinologiya (General Endocrinology), Moscow: Vyssh. Shk., 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Kotenkova, E.V., Methodological approaches to the study of chemical communication in mammals. Olfactory signals as mechanisms of ethological isolation between species, in Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Zoologiya pozvonochnykh (Advances in Science and Technology. Vertebrate Zoology), Moscow: VINITI, 1988, vol. 15, pp. 92–151.Google Scholar
  8. Kotenkova, E.V., Comparative analysis of ethological and physiological mechanisms of precopulative reproductive isolation in rodents, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2014, vol. 135, pp. 488–518.Google Scholar
  9. Kotenkova, E.V. and Naidenko, S.V., Discrimination of con- and heterospecific odors in different taxa of the Mus musculus species group: olfactory cues as precopulatory isolating mechanism, in Advances in Chemical Communication in Vertebrates, Johnston, R.E., Muller-Schwarze, D., and Sorensen, P., Eds., New York: Plenum Press, 1999, pp. 299–308.Google Scholar
  10. Kotenkova, E.V., Osadchuck, A.V., and Lyalyukhina, S.I., Precopulatory isolating mechanisms between the house and mound-building mouse, Acta Theriol., 1989, vol. 34, pp. 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kotenkova, E.V., Maltsev, A.N., and Ambaryan, A.V., The influence of early olfactory experience on mate choice in mammals: evolutionary aspects, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2017, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 21–39.Google Scholar
  12. Maras, P.M. and Petrulis, A., Olfactory experience and the development of odor preference and vaginal marking in female Syrian hamsters, Physiol. Behav., 2008a, vol. 94, pp. 545–551.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Maras, P.M. and Petrulis, A., The role of early olfactory experience in the development of adult odor preferences in rodents, in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Hurst, J.L., Beynon, R.J., Roberts, S.C., and Wyatt, T., Eds., New York: Springer, 2008b, pp. 251–260.Google Scholar
  14. Quadagno, D.M. and Banks, E.M., The effect of reciprocal cross fostering on the behaviour of two species of rodents, Mus musculus and Baiomys taylori ater, Anim. Behav., 1970, vol. 18, pp. 379–390.Google Scholar
  15. Sokolov, V.E. and Kotenkova, E.V., Comparative study of the responses to olfactory signals of house and moundbuilding mice (Rodentia, Muridae), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1987, no. 2, pp. 165–171.Google Scholar
  16. Sokolov, V.E., Lyalyukhina, S.I., and Kotenkova, E.V., Comparative study of the responses to olfactory signals of house and mound-building mice (Rodentia, Muridae), Zool. Zh., 1983, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1394–1398.Google Scholar
  17. Sokolov, V.E., Osadchuk, A.V., and Kotenkova, E.V., Marking activity, morphometric analysis of steroid-dependent organs, and species specificity of the sexual activity of male house and mound-building mice, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, vol. 300, no. 5, pp. 1270–1273.Google Scholar
  18. Sokolov, V.E., Kotenkova, E.V., and Lyalyukhina, S.I., Biologiya domovoi i kurganchikovoi myshei (Biology of House and Mound-Building Mice), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Surov, A.V. and Maltsev, A.N., Analysis of chemical communication in mammals: zoological and ecological aspects, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2016, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Voznesenskaya, A.E., Ambaryan, A.V., Klyuchnikova, M.A., Kotenkova, E.V., and Voznesenskaya, V.V., Mechanisms of reproductive isolation in house mouse superspecies complex Mus musculus s. lato: from behaviour to receptors, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2010, vol. 435, pp. 418–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Voznessenskaya, V.V., Feoktistova, N.Yu., and Wysocki, C.J., Is there a time during neonatal development for maximal imprinting of odor?, in Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Proceedinds of the 8-th International Symposium on Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Johnston, R.E., Muller-Schwarze, D., and Sorensen, P.W., Eds., New York: Kluwer Acad., 1999, pp. 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wuensch, K.L., Fostering house mice onto rats and deer mice: effects on response to species odors, Anim. Learn. Behav., 1992, vol. 20, pp. 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Kotenkova
    • 1
  • A. V. Ambaryan
    • 1
  • A. N. Maltsev
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Problems of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations