Abstract
The apparent adult survival rate is one of the key population parameters of migratory birds. The widely used Cormack–Jolly–Seber capture–mark–recapture model has a number of disadvantages, the main one of which is the impossibility of discerning mortality and permanent emigration. The accuracy of survival estimates can be increased using a multistate capture–mark–recapture model, with the help of which it is possible to assess the survival of successful and unsuccessful birds separately. We used this model to estimate the apparent survival rates of adults in local populations of three ground-nesting passerines: Booted Warbler (Iduna caligata), Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra), and Yellow Wagtail (Motacilla flava), all breeding on abandoned agricultural lands. We studied the reproductive success of 472 marked pairs and analyzed individual capture histories of 814 birds. The previous reproductive success was found to influence significantly the apparent survival of adults. This relation was best expressed in the Yellow Wagtail (apparent survival of successful birds, φ = 0.39 ± 0.06, vs. that of unsuccessful birds, φ = 0.19 ± 0.06) and the Whinchat (apparent survival of successful birds, φ = 0.32 ± 0.05, vs. apparent survival of unsuccessful birds, φ = 0.10 ± 0.05), but a little lower in the Booted Warbler (apparent survival of successful birds, φ = 0.33 ± 0.17, vs. apparent survival of unsuccessful birds, φ = 0.16 ± 0.13). Unsuccessful individuals leave the study area for good, while most of the successful birds return there the next year. Thus, the apparent survival rate of passerines evaluated with capture–recapture models is determined to a considerable degree by the previous reproductive success within local populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardin, A.V., Evaluation of the annual persistence of adults in the population of finch (Fringilla coelebs) on the Curo nian Spit, Trudy Zool. Inst. AN SSSR, 1990, vol. 210, pp. 18–34.
Bell, C., Climate change and spring migration in the Yellow Wagtail, Motacilla flava: an Afrotropical perspective, J. Ornithol., 2007, vol. 148, pp. 495–499.
Blackburn, E. and Cresswell, W., High winter site fidelity in a long-distance migrant: implications for wintering ecology and survival estimates, J. Ornithol., 2016, vol. 157, pp. 93–108.
Bötsch, Y., Arlettaz, R., and Schaub, M., Breeding dispersal of Eurasian Hoopoes (Upupa epops) within and between years in relation to reproductive success, sex, and age, Auk, 2012, vol. 129, pp. 283–295.
Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R., Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach, New York, USA: Springer, 2002.
Burskii, O.V., Estimating survival of thrushes: statistical model of capture–recapture probabilities, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2011, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 415–431.
Choquet, R., Lebreton, J.-D., Gimenez, O., Reboulet, A.-M., and Pradel, R., U-CARE: utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data, Ecography, 2009, vol. 32, pp. 1071–1074.
Cline, M.H., Strong, A.M., Sillett, T.S., Rodenhouse, N.L., and Holmes, R.T., Correlates and consequences of breeding dispersal in a migratory songbird, Auk, 2013, vol. 130, pp. 742–752.
Cormack, R.M., Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals, Biometrika, 1964, vol. 51, p. 429.
Dinsmore, S.J., White, G.C., and Knopf, F.L., Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival, Ecology, 2002, vol. 83, pp. 3476–3488.
Doligez, B., Danchin, E., Clobert, J., and Gustafsson, L., The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non-colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher, J. Anim. Ecol., 1999, vol. 68, pp. 1193–1206.
Ergon, T. and Gardner, B., Separating mortality and emigration: modelling space use, dispersal and survival with robust-design spatial-capture-recapture data, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1327–1336.
Gilroy, J.J., Virzi, T., Boulton, R.L., and Lockwood, J.L., A new approach to the “apparent survival” problem: estimating true survival rates from mark–recapture studies, Ecology, 2012, vol. 93, pp. 1509–1516.
Greenwood, P.J. and Harvey, P.H., The natal and breeding dispersal of birds, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1982, vol. 13, pp. 1–21.
Haas, C.A., Effects of prior nesting success on site fidelity and breeding dispersal: an experimental approach, Auk, 1998, vol. 115, pp. 929–936.
Hoover, J.P., Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the Prothonotary Warbler, Ecology, 2003, vol. 84, pp. 416–430.
Ibáñez-Álamo, J.D., Magrath, R.D., Oteyza, J.C., Chalfoun, A.D., Haff, T.M., Schmidt, K.A., Thomson, R.L., and Martin, T.E., Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives, J. Ornithol., 2015, vol. 156, pp. 247–262.
Jolly, G.M., Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model, Biometrika, 1965, vol. 52, p. 225.
Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D.R., Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies, Ecol. Monogr., 1992, vol. 62, pp. 67–118.
Lebreton, J.-D., Nichols, J.D., Barker, R.J., Pradel, R., and Spendelow, J.A., modeling individual animal histories with Multistate Capture–Recapture Models, Adv. Ecol. Res., 2009, vol. 41, pp. 87–173.
Low, M., Arlt, D., Eggers, S., and Pärt, T., Habitat-specific differences in adult survival rates and its links to parental workload and on-nest predation, J. Anim. Ecol., 2010, vol. 79, pp. 214–224.
Mayfield, H.F., Suggestions for calculating nest success, Wilson Bull., 1975, vol. 87, pp. 456–466.
Müller, M., Spaar, R., Schifferli, L., and Jenni, L., Effects of changes in farming of subalpine meadows on a grassland bird, the Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra), J. Ornithol., vol. 146, pp. 14–23.
Nichols, J.D., Hines, J.E., Pollock, K.H., Hinz, R.L., and Link, W.A., Estimating breeding proportions and testing hypotheses about costs of reproduction with capture-recapture data, Ecology, 1994, vol. 75, pp. 2052–2065.
Paevskii, V.A., Demografiya ptits (Demographics of Birds), Leningrad: Nauka, 1985.
Paevskii, V.A., Demograficheskaya struktura i populyatsionnaya dinamika pevchikh ptits (The Demographic Structure and Population Dynamics of Songbirds), St. Petersburg: Tovar. Nauch. Izd. KMK, 2008.
Paradis, E., Baillie, S.R., Sutherland, W.J., and Gregory, R.D., Patterns of natal and breeding dispersal in birds, J. Anim. Ecol., 1998, vol. 67, pp. 518–536.
Pasinelli, G., Müller, M., Schaub, M., and Jenni, L., Possible causes and consequences of philopatry and breeding dispersal in Red-Backed Shrikes Lanius collurio, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2007, vol. 61, pp. 1061–1074.
Schaub, M. and Royle, J.A., Estimating true instead of apparent survival using spatial Cormack–Jolly–Seber models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2014, vol. 5, pp. 1316–1326.
Schaub, M. and von Hirschheydt, J., Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal, and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models, J. Anim. Ecol., 2009, vol. 78, pp. 625–635.
Schaub, M., Jakober, H., and Stauber, W., Demographic response to environmental variation in breeding, stopover and non-breeding areas in a migratory passerine, Oecologia, 2011, vol. 167, pp. 445–459.
Seber, G.A.F., A note on the multiple-recapture census, Biometrika, 1965, vol. 52, p. 249.
Sedgwick, J.A., Site fidelity, territory fidelity, and natal philopatry in Willow Flycatchers (Empidonax traillii), Auk, 2004, vol. 121, pp. 1103–1121.
Shitikov, D.A., Fedotova, S.E., and Gagieva, V.A., Nest survival, predators and breeding performance of Booted Warblers Iduna caligata in the abandoned fields of the north of European Russia, Acta Ornithologica, 2012, vol. 47, pp. 137–146.
Shitikov, D.A., Dubkova, E., and Makarova, T.V., The demography of Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava on the abandoned fields in Northern European Russia, Bird Study, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 518–526.
Shitikov, D.A., Fedotova, S.E., Red’kin, Ya.A., and But’ev, V.T., Birds of Russia and neighboring countries: Booted Warbler Iduna caligata, Russ. Ornitol. Zh., 2014, vol. 23, no. 1070, pp. 3593–3623.
Shitikov, D.A., Vaytina, T.M., Gagieva, V.A., and Fedchuk, D.V., Breeding success affects site fidelity in a Whinchat Saxicola rubetra population in abandoned fields, Bird Study, 2015, vol. 62, pp. 96–105.
Siriwardena, G.M., Baillie, S.R., and Wilson, J.D., Variation in the survival rates of some British passerines with respect to their population trends on farmland, Bird Study, 1998, vol. 45, pp. 276–292.
Skrade, P.D.B. and Dinsmore, S.J., Sex-related dispersal in the Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus), Auk, 2010, vol. 127, pp. 671–677.
Taylor, C.M., Lank, D.B., and Sandercock, B.C., Using local dispersal data to reduce bias in annual apparent survival and mate fidelity, Condor, 2015, vol. 117, pp. 598–608.
Taylor, J., Determinants of variation in productivity, adult survival and recruitment in a declining migrant bird: the Whinchat (Saxicola rubetra), Ph. D. Thesis, Lancaster University, 2015, pp. 1–296.
White, G.C., Kendall, W.L., and Barker, R.J., Multistate survival models and their extensions in program MARK, J. Wildlife Manag., 2006, vol. 70, pp. 1521–1529.
Winkler, D.W., Wrege, P.H., Allen, P.E., Kast, T.L., Senesac, P., et al., Breeding dispersal and philopatry in the Tree Swallow, Condor, 2004, vol. 106, pp. 768–776.
Xenophontos, M. and Cresswell, W., Survival and dispersal of the Cyprus Wheatear Oenanthe cypriaca, an endemic migrant, J. Ornithol., 2016, vol. 157, pp. 707–719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © D.A. Shitikov, T.M. Vaytina, T.V. Makarova, S.E. Fedotova, N.A. Krasnykh, Y.A. Yurchenko, 2017, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2017, Vol. 96, No. 7, pp. 827–837.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shitikov, D.A., Vaytina, T.M., Makarova, T.V. et al. Breeding Success Affects the Apparent Survival of Grassland Passerines. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 44, 1046–1055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359017090138
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359017090138