Abstract
We have studied the behavior of ferrocene CpFeCp (FcH), ferrocenium triiodide [FcH]+I −3 , dimethylaminomethylferrocene FcCH2NMe2 and its trimethylammonium salt [FcCH2NMe3]+I− under the conventional conditions of electrospray ionization (ESI), when the substance solution is subjected to spraying, and in two versions of desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), when the sprayed solvent bombards the surface of solid or liquid samples. In addition to these techniques, the behavior of neutral compounds under conditions of electrospray ionization of vapors of the studied compounds in a gas phase (ESI_V) has been investigated. It has been shown using the examples of ferrocene and its dimethylaminomethyl derivative that the detection limits for these compounds occurring in a gas phase are comparable within an order of magnitude with their detection limits under the ESI and DESI conditions of solid and liquid samples. The high effectiveness of ionization of analyte vapors makes it possible to use the ESI method not only in combination with liquid (conventional ESI technology) and thin layer chromatography (DESI), but also with gas liquid chromatography (ESI_V). Thus, the electrospray ionization becomes a universal method allowing studies of a compound under the natural conditions in any state of aggregation, that is, solid, liquid, and gas. With the help of statistical methods for designing experiments (complete factorial experiment), quantitative evaluation of the influence of experimental parameters on the ion-formation processes under different ESI conditions has been carried out, which makes it possible to purposefully select the optimal conditions to record the ESI mass spectra with a minimum number of experiments. Moreover, analysis of the dependences of the mass spectra on the experimental parameters can serve as an instrument for studying the details of the ion-formation mechanisms depending upon different ways of ionization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleksandrov, M.L., Gall’, L.N., Krasnov, N.V., Nikolaev, V.I., and Shkurov, V.A., Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1984, vol. 277, no. 2, p. 379.
Yamashita, M. and Fenn, J.B., J. Phys. Chem., 1984, vol. 88, no. 20, p. 4451.
Cole, R.B., J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, vol. 35, no. 7, p. 763.
Kebarle, P. and Peschke, M., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, vol. 406, p. 11.
Takáts, Z., Wiseman, J.M., Gologan, B., and Cooks, R.G., Science, 2004, vol. 306, no. 5695, p. 471.
Costa, A.B. and Cooks, R.G., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2008, vol. 464, nos. 1–3, p. 1.
Chipuk, J.E. and Brodbelt, J.S., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 2009, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 584.
Miao, Z. and Chen, Hao, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 2009, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 10.
Venter, A., Nefliu, M., and Cooks, R.G., TrAC, 2008, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 284.
de la Mora, L., Van Berkel, G., Enke, C., Cole, R., Martinez Sanchez, M., and Fenn, J.B. J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, vol. 35, no. 8, p. 939.
Benassi, M., Wu, C., Nefliu, M., Ifa, D.R., Volny’, M., and Cooks, R.G., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 2009, vol. 280, nos. 1–3, p. 235.
Blades, A.T., Ikonomou, M.G., and Kebarle, P., Anal. Chem., 1991, vol. 63, no. 19, p. 2109.
Van Berkel, G.J. and Zhou, F., Anal. Chem., 1995, vol. 67, no. 17, p. 2916.
Amad, M.H., Cech, N.B., Jackson, G.S., and Enke, C.G., J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, vol. 35, no. 7, p. 784.
Wu, C., Siems, W.F., and Hill, H., Jr., Anal. Chem., 2000, vol. 72, no. 2, p. 396.
Tam, M. and Hill, H., Jr., Anal. Chem., 2004, vol. 76, no. 10, p. 2741.
Martínez-Lozano, P., Rus, J., de la Mora, G.F., Hernández, M., and de la Mora, J.F., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 2009, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 10.
Martínez-Lozano, P. and de la Mora, J.F., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 2007, vol. 265, no. 1, p. 68.
Nekrasov, Yu.S., Borisov, Yu.A., Skazov, R.S., Simenel, A.A., Snegur, L.V., Belousov, Yu.A., and Rodionov, A.N., J. Organomet. Chem., 2009, vol. 694, no. 12, p. 1807.
Nekrasov, Yu.S., Borisov, Yu.A., Skazov, R.S, Rodionov, A.N., Simenel, A.A., and Belousov, Yu.A., Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser.: Khim., 2009, no. 7, p. 1476.
Sukharev, Yu.N. and Nekrasov, Yu.S. Org. Mass Spectrom., 1976, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1232.
Lindsay, J.K. and Hauser, C.R., J. Org. Chem., 1957, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 355.
Xu, X., Nolan, S.P., and Cole, R.B., Anal. Chem., 1994, vol. 66, no. 1, p. 119.
Van Berkel, G.J. and Zhou, F., Anal. Chem., 1995, vol. 67, no. 21, p. 3958.
Henderson, W., Oliver, A.G., and Downard, A.J., Polyhedron, 1996, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 1165.
Nalimov, V.V. and Chernova, N.A., Statisticheskie metody planirovaniya ekstremal’nykh eksperimentov (Statistical Methods for Planning Extreme Experiments), Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
Nekrasov, Yu.S., Skazov, R.S., Simenel, A.A., Borisov, Yu.A., Snegur, L.V., and Shcherbakov, A.V., Mass-spektrometria, 2007, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 89.
Andrews, J.S.T. and Westrum, E.F., Jr., J. Organomet. Chem., 1969, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 349.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.S. Nekrasov, N.S. Ikonnikov, Yu.A. Belousov, S.S. Kiselev, 2010, published in Mass-spektrometria, No. 7(4), pp. 271–277.
The article was translated by the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nekrasov, Y.S., Ikonnikov, N.S., Belousov, Y.A. et al. Comparative studies of the behavior of neutral and ionic ferrocene derivatives under different conditions of electrospray ionization. J Anal Chem 66, 1291–1297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934811130132
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934811130132