Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation between the Hochschild Cohomology and the Eilenberg–MacLane Cohomology of Group Algebras from a Geometric Point of View

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are two approaches to the study of the cohomology of group algebras ℝ[G]: the Eilenberg-MacLane cohomology and the Hochschild cohomology. In the case of Eilenberg-MacLane cohomology, one has the classical cohomology of the classifying space BG. The Hochschild cohomology represents a more general construction, in which the so-called two-sided bimodules are considered. The Hochschild cohomology and the usual Eilenberg-MacLane cohomology are coordinated by moving from bimodules to left modules. For the Eilenberg-MacLane cohomology, in the case of a nontrivial action of the group G on the module Ml, no reasonable geometric interpretation has been known so far. The main result of this paper is devoted to an effective geometric description of the Hochschild cohomology. The key point for the new geometric description of the Hochschild cohomology is the new groupoid Gr associated with the adjoint action of the group G. The cohomology of the classifying space BGr of this groupoid with an appropriate condition for the finiteness of the support of cochains is isomorphic to the Hochschild cohomology of the algebra ℝ[G]. Hochschild homology is described in the form of homology groups of the space BGr, but without any conditions of finiteness on chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Eilenberg and S. MacLane, “Cohomology Theory in Abstract Groups. I,” Ann. of Math. 48 (1), 51–78 (1947).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D. J. Benson, Representations and Cohomology II: Cohomology of Groups and Modules (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 31, Cambridge University Press, 1991).

  3. S. Eilenberg and S. MacLane, “Cohomology Theory in Groups,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, pp. 53, Abstract no. 9 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Eilenberg and S. Mac-Lane, “Relations between Homology and Homotopy Groups of Spaces,” Ann. of Math. 46, 480–509 (1945).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. G. P. Hochschild, “On the Cohomology Groups of an Associative Algebra,” Annals of Math. 46, 58–67 (1945).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. P. Hochschild, “On the Cohomology Theory for Associative Algebras,” Annals of Math. 47, 568–579 (1946).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. S. Mishchenko, “Reduction of Differential Calculus on a Noncompact Manifold to a Compact Manifold of Doubled Dimension and a Smooth Version of the Johnson Problem on the Derivations of Group Algebras,” Collection: “Modern Methods and Problems of Mathematical Hydrodynamics” 2019, Materials of the international scientific conference, Voronezh State University (Voronezh), pp. 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Mishchenko, “Geometric Description of the Hochschild Cohomology of Group Algebras,” Abstract. Book of Abstracts of Conference “Topology, Geometry, and Dynamics: Rokhlin - 100,” St-Petersburg, p. 64 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Witherspoon, An Introduction to Hochschild Cohomology (Texas A&M University, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I.M. Gelfand, “On Elliptic Equations,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 15 (3), 121–132 (1960) [Russian Math. Surveys 15 (3), 113-123 (1960)].

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. F. Atiyah, “The Index of Elleptic Operators on Compact Manifolds,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 69, 422–433 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Grushin, “Pseudodifferential Operators on Rn with Bounded Symbols,” Funktsional. Anal, i Prilozhen. 4 (3), 37–50 (1970) [Funct. Anal. Appl. 4 (3), 202–212 (1970)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Arutyunov and A. S. Mishchenko, “Reduction of PDO Calculus on a Noncompact Manifold to a Double-Dimensional Compact Manifold,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 451 (4), 369–373 (2013) [Dokl. Math. 88 (1), 427–430 (2013)].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Arutyunov and A. S. Mishchenko, “Reduction of the Calculus of Pseudodifferential Operators on a Noncompact Manifold to the Calculus on a Compact Manifold of Doubled Dimension,” Mat. Zametki 94 (4), 488–505 (2013) [Math. Notes 94 (4), 455–469 (2013)].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. V. P. Maslov, Operator Methods (Nauka, Moscow, 1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. B. E. Johnson, “The Derivation Problem for Group Algebras of Connected Locally Compact Groups,” J. London Math. Soc. 63 (2), 441–452 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Losert, “The Derivation Problem for Group Algebras,” Ann. of Math. 168, 221–246 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. H. G. Dales, Banach Algebras and Automatic Continuity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000), Definition 1.8.1, pp. 114.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Ghahramani, V. Runde, and G. Willis, “Derivations on Group Algebras,” Proc. London Math. Soc. 80, 360–390 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Hewitt and K. A. Ross, Abstract Harmonic Analysis, II (Springer, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (Academic Press, 1994).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Lyndon and P. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. A. A. Arutyunov and A. S. Mishchenko, “Smooth Version of Johnson’s Problem Concerning Derivations of Group Algebras,” Sb. Math. 210 (6), 756–782 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by RFBR grant no. 18-01-00398.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Mishchenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishchenko, A.S. Correlation between the Hochschild Cohomology and the Eilenberg–MacLane Cohomology of Group Algebras from a Geometric Point of View. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 27, 236–250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920820020107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061920820020107

Navigation