Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 299–306 | Cite as

Hall quantum Hamiltonians and electric 2D-curvature

  • M. V. KarasevEmail author


For the Dirac 2D-operator in a constant magnetic field with perturbing electric potential, we derive Hamiltonians describing the quantum quasiparticles (Larmor vortices) at Landau levels. The discrete spectrum of this Hall-effect quantum Hamiltonian can be computed to all orders of the semiclassical approximation by a deformed Planck-type quantization condition on the 2D-plane; the standard magnetic (symplectic) form on the plane is corrected by an “electric curvature” determined via derivatives of the electric field. The electric curvature does not depend on the magnitude of the electric field and vanishes for homogeneous fields (i.e., for the canonical Hall effect). This curvature can be treated as an effective magnetic charge of the inhomogeneous Hall 2D-nanosystem.


Mathematical Physic Electric Potential Discrete Spectrum Landau Level Magnetic Charge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Peierls, “Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von Leitungselektronen,” Z. Phys. 80, 763–791 (1933).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Laughlin, “Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Fractionally Charged Excitations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Girvin and T. Jach, “Formalism for the Quantum Hall Effect: Hilbert Space of Analytic Funcions,” Phys. Rev. B 29, 5617–5625 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Quantum Hall Effect, Ed. by R. E. Prange and S. Girvin (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Alicki and J. Klauder, “Landau-Level Ground-State Degeneracy and Its Relevance for a General Quantization Procedure,” Phys. Rev. A 48, 2538–2548 (1993).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. M. Girvin, “The Quantum Hall Effect: Novel Excitations and Broken Symmetries,” in Les Houches Lecture Notes. Topological Aspects of Low Dimensional Systems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Les Éditions de Physique, Les Ulis, 1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Fock, “Bemerkungen zur Quantelung des harmonischen Oszillators im Magnetfeld,” Z. Phys. A. 47(5–6), 446–448 (1928).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Dunne and R. Jackiw, “’Peierls Substitution and Chern-Simons Quantum Mechanics,” Nuclear Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 33C, 114–118 (1993).MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Jackiw, “Physical Instances of Noncommuting Coordinates,” arXiv: physics, hep-th/0110057.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. F. Dayi and A. Jellal, “Hall Effect in Noncommutative Coordinates,” J. Math. Phys. 43(10), 4592–4601 (2002).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. R. Wallace, “The Band Theory of Graphite,” Phys. Rev. 71(9), 622–634 (1947).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. R. Nelson, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg Statistical Mechanics of Membranes and Surfaces (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, “Two-Dimensional Gas of Massless Dirac Fermions in Graphene,” Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, “The Electronic Properties of Graphene,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009); arXiv: cond-mat/0709.1163v2.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.-A. Kim and A. H. Castro Neto, “Graphene as an Electronic Membrane,” Europhys. Lett. 84(5), p. 57005 (2008); arXiv: cond-mat/0702562v2.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. E. Lammert and V. H. Crespi, “Geometrical Perturbation of Graphene Electronic Structure,” Phys. Rev. B 61, 7308–7311 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Lenosky, X. Gonze, M. Teter, and V. Elser, “Energetics of negatively Curved Graphitic Carbon,” Nature 355, 333–335 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Park, M. Yoon, S. Berber, J. Ihm, E. Osawa, and D. Tománek, “Magnetism in All-Carbon Nanostructures with Negative Gaussian Curvature,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(23), 237204 (2003).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Cortijo and M. A. H. Vozmediano, “Electronic Properties of Curved Graphene Sheets,” Europhys. Lett. 77, 47002 (2007); M. A. H. Vozmediano, F. de Juan, and A. Cortijo, “Gauge Fields and Curvature in Graphene,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 129, 012001 (8pp.) (2008); arXiv: cond-mat/0807.3909v1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, “Midgap States and Charge Inhomogeneities in Corrugated Graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 075422 (2008); F. Guinea, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, and K. S. Novoselov, “Generalized Quantizing Pseudomagnetic Fields by Bending Graphene Ribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 035408 (2010); arXiv: cond-mat/0910.5935v1; M. A. H. Vozmediano, M. I. Katsnelson, and F. Guinea, “Gauge Fields in Graphene,” arXiv: cond-mat/1003.5179v2.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. de Juan, A. Cortijo, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, “Dislocations and Torsion in Graphene and Related Systems,” Nuclear Phys. B 828(3), 625–637 (2010); arXiv: cond-mat/0909.4068v1.MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Low and F. Guinea, “Strain-Induced Pseudomagnetic Field for Novel Graphene Electronics,” Nano Lett. 10(9), 3551–3554 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. V. Karasev, “Magneto-Metric Hamiltonians on Quantum Surfaces in the Configuration Space,” Russ. J. Math. Phys. 14(1), 57–65 (2007);M. V. Karasev, “Internal Geometric Current and the Maxwell Equation as a Hamiltonian System on Configuration Surfaces,” Russ. J. Math. Phys. 14 (2), 134–141 (2007); M. V. Karasev, “Geometric Dynamics on Quantum Nano-Surfaces and Low-Energy Spectrum in a Homogeneous Magnetic Field,” Russ. J. Math. Phys. 14 (4), 440–447 (2007); M. V. Karasev, “Qunatum Geometry of Nano-Space,” Russ. J. Math. Phys. 15 (3), 417–420 (2008); M. V. Karasev, “Magneto-Metric Current Competing with Hall Current on Curved Nanosurfaces” (in Russian), Proc. of Intern. Forum on Nanotechnologies, Moscow, 2008, Vol. 1, p. 31.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. V. Karasev, “Graphene as a Quantum Surface with Curvature-Strain Preserving Dynamics,” Russ. J. Math. Phys. 18(1), 25–32 (2011).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. V. Karasev and V. P. Maslov, “Asymptotic and Geometric Quantization,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 39(6), 115–173 (1984) [Russ. Math. Surv. 39, 133–205 (1984)].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. P. Maslov, Operational Methods (Nauka, Moscow, 1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Gosselin, A. Berard, H. Mohrbach and S. Ghosh, “Berry Curvature in Graphene: a New Approach,” Eur. Phys. Jour. C 10052-008-08394 (2009); 0802 3565.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Gosselin, H. Boumrar, and H. Mohrbach, “Semiclassical Quantization of Electrons in Magnetic Fields: the Generalized Peirels Substitution,” Europhysics Letters (EPL) 84 (2008) 50002; arXiv: 0805.2455.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. N. Argyres, “The Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization Rule and the Weyl Correspondence,” Physics 2, 131–139 (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Institute for Electronics and Mathematics at National Research University HSEMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations