Abstract
Total focusing method (TFM) for ultrasonic phased array imaging has the advantages of high imaging resolution, full-scale dynamic focusing and low undetected error rate in ultrasonic detection. However, the problem of long imaging time usually limits its practically applications. The imaging speed can be raised sharply by directly upgrading the detection hardware, but this solution is unavoidable to increase the detection cost. This study is interested in how to improve the TFM imaging speed based on the existing hardware. Thus, an accelerating algorithm combining the asymmetrical optimization mechanism for the full matrix data of ultrasonic array with the sparse one was proposed to simplify the imaging process aiming at reducing the imaging time. Furthermore, TFM imaging experiments of the transverse through hole flaw were finally carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. The results show that in sparse optimization algorithms, the imaging speed of 2 elements sparse is faster and the signal-to-noise ratio of image is higher. The asymmetric optimization and 2 elements sparse optimization are combined in proposed algorithm. The imaging speed of proposed algorithm is improved by 34.56%. Similarly, it is 10.50 and 24.94%, respectively faster than using the asymmetric and 2 elements sparse optimization algorithm. Meanwhile, it is also founded that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of TFM imaging after amplitude optimization is greatly increased by 55.99% without losing the information on the defect characterization. The proposed accelerating algorithm provides an important reference for the practical application of TFM in the ultrasonic phased array flaw detection system.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B. W., and Wilcox P. D., Post processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for nondestructive evaluation, NDT & E Int., 2005, vol. 38, pp. 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920110029
Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W., and Wilcox P.D., Advanced post-processing for scanned ultrasonic arrays: Application to defect detection and classification in nondestructive evaluation, Ultrasonics, 2008, vol. 48, pp. 636–642.
Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W., and Wilcox, P.D., The post-processing of ultrasonic array data using the total focusing method, Insight: Nondestr. Test. Condit. Monit., 2004, vol. 46, pp. 677–680.
June, L., Imagerie ultrasonore par emission d’ondes planes pour le contrôle de structuzres complexes en immersion, Pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’université Paris–Diderot, Paris, 2016.
Couture, O., Fink, M., and Tanter, M., Ultrasound contrast plane wave imaging, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2012, vol. 59, pp. 2676–2683. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tuffc.2012.2508
Montaldo, G., et al., Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2009, vol. 56, pp. 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tuffc.2009.1067
Avagyan, V.K., and Bazulin, E.G., Increasing the rate of recording echo signals with an ultrasonic antenna array using code division multiple access technology, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, pp. 873–886. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830920110029
Bazulin, E., The maximum entropy method in ultrasonic non-destructive testing – increasing the resolution, image noise reduction and echo acquisition rate, Entropy, 2018, vol. 20, p. 621.
Sutcliffe, M., Weston, M., Dutton, B., et al., Real-time full matrix capture for ultrasonic non-destructive testing with acceleration of post-processing through graphic hardware, NDT & E Int., 2012, vol. 51, pp. 16–23.
Njiki, M., Elouardi, A., Bouaziz, S., et al., A real-time implementation of the total focusing method for rapid and precise diagnostic in nondestructive evaluation, IEEE 24th Int. Conf. Appl. Specific Syst. Archit. Proces., Washington D.C., 2013.
Lambert, J., Pedron, A., and Gens, G., Analysis of multicore CPU and GPU toward parallelization of total focusing method ultrasound reconstruction, Conf. Des. Archit. Sign. Imag. Proces., 2012.
Carcreff, E. and Braconnier, D., Comparison of conventional technique and migration approach for total focusing, Phys. Procedia, 2015, vol. 70, pp. 566–569.
Jia, L.C., Chen, S.L., Bai, Z.L., et al., Correction model and accelerating algorithm for ultrasonic total focusing method, Chin. J. Sci. Instrum., 2017, vol. 38, pp. 1589–1596.
Peng, H., Study on ultrasonic phased array full matrix capture imaging technique for CRH wheel set, Doctoral (Med.) Dissertation, Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014.
Peng, H., Peng, J.P., Zhu, H.N., et al., The efficiency optimization of full matrix capture imaging detection based on increasing the effective aperture, Proc. 2014 IEEE Far East Forum Nondestr. Evaluation/Testing, Chengdu, 2014, pp. 44–49.
Hu, H.W., et al., Ultrasonic phased array sparse – tfm imaging based on sparse array optimization and new edge – directed interpolation, Sensors, 2018, vol. 18.
Zhang, H., et al., Lamb waves topological imaging combining with Green’s function retrieval theory to detect near filed defects in isotropic plates, Chin. Phys. B, 2019, vol. 28.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 52075270); Key scientific research projects and soft science research projects of military-civilian integration in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (JMZD202209); Science and Technology Plan Project of Inner Mongolia (2020GG0160); Supported By Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(NJYT22063); and Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2022MS05006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Wang, S., Mao, X. et al. Accelerating Algorithm for Total Focusing Method Imaging Based on Optimization of Full Matrix Data. Russ J Nondestruct Test 59, 161–170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922600642
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922600642