Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing and Interpreting Results of Processing In-Line Inspection Data for Corrosive Gas Transportation Conditions

  • ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstarct

—Many gas and gas condensate fields (Bovanenkovskoe, Urengoiskoe, Kirinskoe, etc.) are distinguished by the presence of corrosive carbon dioxide in the extracted products, which, in the presence of moisture, leads to the formation of local corrosion damage (pits and their accumulations). One of the methods for monitoring the corrosion state of pipelines is in-line inspection (ILI), carried out by the magnetic flux leakage method. ILI is especially relevant for underground and underwater pipelines when the use of other methods of corrosion monitoring is limited or costly. Under conditions of gas production, unlike oil production, corrosion can take place both along the lower part of the pipe (6‑hour corrosion) and during condensation of moisture on the upper part of the pipe (12-hour corrosion). An important process is the correct planning of the ILI, the subsequent processing and interpretation of the obtained data set, which should be carried out taking into account the peculiarities of the development of carbon dioxide corrosion in the gas pipeline and in a comparative analysis with other corrosion monitoring data. When interpreting the ILI data, one should take into account the mechanisms of corrosion development, operating conditions (path profile, etc.), and corrosion monitoring data obtained by other testing methods (simulation tests, results obtained at other, adjacent sections of pipelines, etc.). Correct and useful information according to ILI data will ensure reliable protection of gas pipelines and planning of measures to protect them against internal corrosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Slugin, P.P. and Polyansky, A.V., Optimal method of combating carbon dioxide corrosion of pipelines at the Bovanenkovo oil and gas condensate field, Nauka Tekh. Gazov. Prom-st., 2018, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petrenko, V.E., Nuriev, M.F., Shevelev, M.B., Semenov, Yu.V., Shologin, R.A., Motovilov, V.Yu., Experience in the development of a field on the shelf of the Russian Federation equipped with an underwater production complex, Gazov. Prom-st., 2018, vol. 777, no. 11, pp. 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koryakin, A.Yu., Dikamov, D.V., Kolinchenko, I.V., Yusupov, A.D., Zapevalov, D.N., and Vagapov, R.K., Experience in the selection of corrosion inhibitors to protect the objects of the second section of the Achimov deposits of the Urengoi oil and gas condensate field from carbon dioxide corrosion, Oborud. Tekhnol. Neftegaz. Kompleksa, 2018, no. 6, pp. 48–55. https://doi.org/10.30713/1999-6934-2018-6-48-55

  4. Baydin, I.I., Kharitonov, A.N., Velichkin, A.V., Ilyin, A.V., and Podolyanskiy, E.S., Influence of carbon dioxide in natural gas of gas condensate deposits of the Lower Cretaceous deposits of the Yubileinoe oil and gas condensate field on the operation of UKPG-NTS, Nauka Tekh. Gazov. Prom-st., 2018, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kantyukov, R.R., Zapevalov, D.N., and Vagapov, R.K., Assessment of the hazard of internal carbon dioxide corrosion in relation to field equipment and pipelines at gas and gas condensate fields, Bezop. Truda Prom-sti, 2021, no. 2, pp. 56–62. https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2021-2-56-62

  6. Zapevalov, D.N. and Vagapov, R.K., Analysis of regulatory requirements for assessing carbon dioxide corrosion at gas production facilities, Probl. Anal. Riskov, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 60–71. https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-2-60-71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Veliyulin, I.I., Kantyukov, R.A., Yakupov, N.M., Tameev, I.M., Yakupov, S.N., Kantyukov, R.R., Giniyatullin, R.R., and Nurgaliev, A.R., On corrosion of pipelines, Nauka Tekh. Gazov. Prom-st., 2015, no. 1 (61), pp. 45–50.

  8. Vagapov, R.K., Corrosion destruction of steel equipment and pipelines at gas field facilities in the presence of aggressive components, Tekhnol. Metal., 2021, no. 3, pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.31044/1684-2499-2021-0-3-47-54

  9. Veliyulin, I.I., Kantyukov, R.A., Yakupov, N.M., Tameev, I.M., Yakupov, S.N., Kantyukov, R.R., Giniyatullin, R.R., and Nurgaliev, A.R., Models of corrosive wear, Nauka Tekh. Gazov. Prom-st., 2015, no. 1 (61), pp. 57–67.

  10. Vagapov, R.K. and Zapevalov, D.N., Corrosion activity of operating conditions for the steel equipment and pipelines in the plants extracting CO2-containing gases, Metallurgist, 2021, vol. 65, pp. 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-021-01132-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kantyukov, R.R., Butusov, O.B., Meshalkin, V.P., and Panarin, V.M., Decision support system for risk management of hazardous situations in complex gas supply systems, Software Prod. Syst., 2020, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 250-256. https://doi.org/10.15827/0236-235X.130.250-256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vagapov, R.K., Ibatullin, K.A., and Zapevalov, D.N., Corrosion processes on steel under conditions of moisture condensation and in the presence of carbon dioxide, Chem. Pet. Eng., 2020, vol. 56, nos. 7–8, pp. 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-020-00825-5

  13. Vagapov, R.K. and Zapevalov, D.N., Practical aspects of using diagnostic methods in conjunction with other data on corrosion control and simulation tests during the operation of gas production facilities in corrosive conditions, Defektoskopiya, 2020, no. 7, pp. 61–76. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0130308220070076

  14. Liang, W., Que, P.-W., and Yang, G., Ultrasonic flaw detection during NDE of oil pipelines via a resonance filter, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loskutov, V.E., Matvienko, A.F., Patramanskii, B.V., and Shcherbinin, V.E., The magnetic method for in-tube nondestructive testing of gas and oil pipelines: The past and the present, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Yu. and Yan, G., Detection of gas pipe wall thickness based on electromagnetic flux leakage, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2007, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 123–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erekhinskii, B.A., Diagnosticheskoe Obsluzhivanie Ob’ektov Dobichi Gaza. Prognozirovanie I Prodlenie Resursa. Otsenka Riska (Diagnostic Maintenance of Gas Production Facilities. Forecasting and Extending the Resource. Risk Assessment), Voronezh, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abdul Wahab Al-Mithin, Shabbir Safri, and Andreas Pfanger, UT-ILI and fitness-for-purpose analysis for severely internally corroded crude oil pipeline, Pipeline Technol. Conf., 2013.

  19. Mikhalkina, O.G., Application of the X-ray diffraction method for the study of core and technogenic products, Vesti Gazov. Nauki, 2016, no. 4 (28), pp. 96–107.

  20. Mansoori, H., Mirzaee, R., Esmaeilzadeh, F., Vojood, A., and Dowrani, A.S., Pitting corrosion failure analysis of a wet gas pipeline, Eng. Failure Anal., 2017, vol. 82, pp. 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koryakin, A.Yu., Dikamov, D.V., Neudakhin, A.Yu., Kolinchenko, I.V., Lashkov, E.V., and Yusupov, A.D., Development of a methodology for predicting possible locations for localization of corrosion defects in a gas-collecting manifold based on the results of in-line diagnostics of similar pipelines, Gazov. Prom-st., 2018, vol. 773, no. 3, pp. 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Vagapov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vagapov, R.K. Comparing and Interpreting Results of Processing In-Line Inspection Data for Corrosive Gas Transportation Conditions. Russ J Nondestruct Test 57, 717–726 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921080106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830921080106

Keywords:

Navigation