Skip to main content
Log in

Detection and Identification of Neighboring Pittings Using High-Resolution Optical Method

  • OPTICAL METHODS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neighboring pittings are one of the most frequently found defects in gas pipelines. Due to the interaction with each other, these defects accelerate the corrosion growth rates in the wall of the pipelines. So, it’s meaningful to discriminate multiple neighboring pittings from single pittings by analyzing their properties. However, accurate characterization of these defects is a challenging task because of the limited resolution of the current inspection methods. This paper presents a high-resolution optical inspection method and automated sizing algorithms for estimating the diameters and separation distances of the neighboring pittings. The proposed optical method consists of a three-axis scanner, a linear laser diode, a CCD camera, and a test specimen containing various patterns of neighboring pittings. C-scan images for the defined defect geometries are generated by extracting the intensity information of the reflected laser light captured using a CCD camera. Neighboring pittings can be differentiated and characterized using the obtained C-scan images. Experiments in a lab configuration have been conducted and satisfactory results have been achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Afzal, M. and Udpa, S., Advanced signal processing of magnetic flux leakage data obtained from seamless gas pipeline, NDT&E Int., 2002, vol. 35, pp. 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Santamaria, W. and Bluck, M., Advancements in the detection and sizing of pinhole metal loss, in Proc. 2014 10th Int. Pipeline Conf., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2014.

  3. Y. Gunaltun, Top of line corrosion in gas lines confirmed by condensation analysis, Oil Gas J., 1999, vol. 97, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singer, M., CO2 top of the line corrosion in presence of acetic acid: A parametric study, in Proc. NACE CORROSIO-N 2009, Atlanta, 2009.

  5. Pugh, D.V., Top-of-line corrosion mechanism for sour wet gas pipelines, NACE CORROSION, 2009, paper no. 09285.

  6. Macaw's Pipeline Defects. s.l.: Yellow Pencil Marketing, Argent, C., Ed., Pennwell Corp., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ravan, M., Amineh, R.K., Koziel, S., Nikolova, N.K., and Reilly, J. P., Sizing of 3-D arbitrary defects using magnetic flux leakage measurements, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2010, vol. 46, pp. 1024–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson, R., An Introduction to Pipeline Pigging, Pigging Prod. Serv. Assoc., 2002.

  9. Walker, J., In-line inspection of pipelines—advanced technologies for economic and safe operation of oil and gas pipelines, Rosen GroupRosen Swiss Ag, 2010, no. 327.

  10. Gunaltun, Y., Piccardino, R., and Vinazza, D., Interpretation of MFL and UT inspection results in case of top of line corrosion, NACE Corrosion Expo, 2006, NACE paper no. 06170.

  11. Huyse, L., Roodselaar, A.V., Onderdonk, J., Wimolsukpirakul, B., Baker, J., Beuker, T., Palmer, J., and Jemari, N.A., Improvements in the accurate estimation of top of the line internal corrosion of subsea pipelines on the basis of in-line inspection data, in Proc. 8th Int. Pipeline Conf., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2010.

  12. Cordell, J.L., In-line inspection: What technology is best?, Pipe Line Ind., 1991, vol. 47, p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duran, O., Althoefer, K., and Seneviratne, L.D., State of the art in sensor technologies for sewer inspection, Sensors J., IEEE, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ref Manuals & Reports Fd-6. Existing Sewer Evaluation and Rehabilitation.Vol. 62, Reston, VA: Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 1994.

  15. Kirkham, R., Kearney, P.D., Rogers, K.J., and Mashford, J., PIRAT: A system for quantitative sewer pipe assessment, Int. J. Robotics Res., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dirksen, J., Clemens, F., Korving, H., Cherqui, F., Gauffre, P., Ertl, T., Plihal, H., Muller, K., and Snaterse, C., The consistency of visual sewer inspection data, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 2013, vol. 9, pp. 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D.M., Iseley, T., and Prasanth, R.K., Assessment technologies for sewer system rehabilitation, Autom. Constr., 1998, vol. 7, pp. 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olhoeft, G.R., Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar, J. Appl. Geophys., 2000, vol. 43, pp. 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng, Z., Horoshenkov, V., Tareq, M., and Tait, S., An acoustic method for condition classification in live sewer networks, in Proc. 18th World Conf. Nondestr. Test., Durban, South Africa, 2012.

  20. Zhang, Z., A flexible new technique for camera calibration, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2000, vol. 22, pp. 1330–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright, D., Greve, P., Fleischer, J., and Austin, L., Laser beam width, divergence and beam propagation factor—an international standardization approach, Opt. Quantum Electron., 1992, vol. 24, pp. 993–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonzalez, R.C. and Wintz, P., Digital Image Processing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Safizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azizzadeh, T., Safizadeh, M.S. Detection and Identification of Neighboring Pittings Using High-Resolution Optical Method. Russ J Nondestruct Test 56, 275–283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092003002X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092003002X

Keywords:

Navigation