Abstract
The main advantages and disadvantages of universal software packages designed to solve problems of magnetostatics are indicated. The problems arising from the use of such packages are discussed, and possible ways to overcome these barriers are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chernykh, I.V., Reshenie polevykh zadach s pomoshch’yu programmy ELCUT 4.2 (Solving Field Problems Using the ELCUT 4.2 Program), Yekaterinburg: Ural State Tech. Univ., 2005.
Zhidkov, A.V., Primenenie sistemy ANSYS k resheniyu zadach geometricheskogo i konechno-elementnogo modelirovaniya (Application of the ANSYS System to Solving Problems of Geometrical and Finite-Element Modeling), Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Univ., 2006.
Mikhlin, S.G., Lineinye uravneniya v chastnykh prozivodnykh (Linear Partial Differential Equations), Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola, 1977.
Descloux, J., Metod konechnykh elementov (Finite Element Method), Moscow: Mir, 1976.
Rektorys, K., Variational Methods in Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Springer, 2001, 2nd Ed.
Andreev, V.B. and Rukhovets, L.A., Proektsionnye metody (metod konechnykh elementov) (Projection Methods (Finite Element Method)), Moscow: Znanie, 1986.
Fletcher, C.A.J., Computational Galerkin Methods, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
Ivanov, D.V. and Dol’, A.V., Vvedenie v Ansys Workbench/Ucheno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya studentov estestvenno-nauchnykh distsiplin (Introduction to Ansys Workbench. A Tutorial for Students of Natural Sciences), Saratov: Amirit, 2016.
Frizen, V.E., Chernykh, I.V., Bychkov, S.A., and Tarasov, F.E., Metody rascheta elektricheskikh i magnitnykh polei/Uchebnyi komplekt (Methods for Calculating Electric and Magnetic Fields. A Training Kit), Yekaterinburg: Ural Fed. Univ., 2014.
Andreeva, E.G., Shamets, S.P., and Kolmogorov, D.V., Raschet statsionarnykh magnitnykh polei i kharakteristik elektrotekhnicheskikh ustroistv s pomoshch’yu programmnogo paketa Ansys (Calculation of Stationary Magnetic Fields and Characteristics of Electrical Devices Using the Ansys Software Package), Omsk: Omsk State Tech. Univ., 2004.
Kizhaev, I.V., Andryushchenko, V.Yu., Karnaukhov, N.A., Yuferev, M.S., and Timofeev, S.P., Comparative analysis of FEM-based software packages, SCI-ARTICLE.RU, 2017, no. 43. pp. 21–29.
Fisenko, V.G., Chislennye raschety elektromagnitnykh polei v elektricheskikh mashinakh na osnove metoda konechnykh elementov (Numerical Calculations of Electromagnetic Fields in Electrical Machines Based on the Finite Element Method), Moscow: Moscow Power Eng. Inst., 2002.
Pechenkov, A.N., Scherbinin, V.E., Shleenkov, S.A., and Bulychev, O.A., Computational relationships for the development of software for calculating magnetostatic fields from flaws in arbitrarily shaped ferromagnetic products, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 755–764.
Reutov, Yu.Ya., Gobov, Yu.L., and Loskutov, V.E., Feasibilities of using the ELCUT software for calculations in nondestructive testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2002, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 425–430.
Dyakin, V.V., Umergalina, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Ya., The field of a finite defect in a 3D semispace, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2005, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 502–513.
Dyakin, V.V., Raevskii, V.Ya., and Umergalina, O.V., A magnetostatic problem for a semispace with a spherical defect in an inhomogeneous external field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2007, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–11.
Dyakin, V.V., Rayevskiy, V.Y., and Kudrjashova, O.V., The field of a finite defect in a plate, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–209.
Dyakin, V.V., Raevskii, V.Ya., and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a sphere, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 604–615.
Dyakin, V.V. and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a cylinder, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 226–237.
Dyakin, V.V. and Kudryashova, O.V., A flaw in a pipe, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 555–567.
Dyakin, V.V., Kudryashova, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Y., Exact solution of one problem of magnetostatics in bipolar coordinates (continued), Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 400–408.
Pechenkov, A.N. and Scherbinin, V.E., Nekotorye pryamye i obratnye zadachi tekhnicheskoi magnitostatiki (Some Direct and Inverse Problems of Technical Magnetostatics), Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 2004.
Dyakin, V.V., Kudryaschova, O.V., and Raevskii V.Y., One approach to solving the basic equation of magnetostatics in the case of nonhomogeneous magnets, Theor. Math. Phys., 2016, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 525–538.
Shur, M.L., Smorodinskii, Y.G., and Novoslugina, A.P., The magnetic field of an arbitrary shaped defect in a plane-parallel plate, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 669–679.
Shcherbinin, V.E. and Shur, M.L., Accounting for the influence of the product boundary on the field of a cylindrical defect, Defektoskopiya, 1976, no. 6, pp. 30–36.
Sapozhnikov, A.B. Some simplest nonlinear calculations in the theory of magnetic flaw detection, Tr. Sib. Phys.-Tech. Inst, Tosmk State Univ., 1950, no. 30. 1950.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.V. Dyakin, O.V. Kudryashova, V.Ya. Raevskii, 2018, published in Defektoskopiya, 2018, No. 11, pp. 25–35.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyakin, V.V., Kudryashova, O.V. & Raevskii, V.Y. On the Use of Multipurpose Software Packages for Solving Problems of Magnetostatics. Russ J Nondestruct Test 54, 765–775 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830918110037
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830918110037