Advertisement

Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 151–163 | Cite as

Methods for Nondestructive Testing and Diagnostics of Durability of Articles Made of Polymer Composite Materials

  • A. I. PotapovEmail author
  • V. E. Makhov
Acoustic Methods
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Results of theoretical and experimental studies of the nondestructive testing of the strength properties of polymer composite materials (fiberglass) and articles produced thereof (cylindrical shells) are considered. Most attention has been paid to the ultrasonic propagation-time and acousticemission methods as well as an ultrasonic method based on measuring the velocities of longitudinal and transverse elastic waves in the tangential and axial directions of a cylindrical shell. Analytical and correlation equations have been derived that establish connection between destructive and nondestructive testing.

Keywords

strength properties polymer materials composite materials polymer composite materials ultrasonic method acoustic emission strain sensor piezoelectric sensor longitudinal wave transverse wave 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abramov, O.V. and Rozenbaum, A.N., Prognozirovanie sostoyaniya tekhnicheskikh sistem (Forecasting of the State of Technical Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makhutov, N.A. and Permyakov, V.N., Resurs bezopasnoi ekspluatatsii sosudov i truboprovodov (Safety Resource for In-Service Vessels and Pipelines), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Syzrantsev, V.N. and Golofast, C.L., Izmerenie tsiklicheskikh deformatsii i prognozirovanie dolgovechnosti detalei po pokazaniyam datchikov deformatsii integral’nogo tipa (Measurement of Cyclic Deformation and Forecasting the Durability of Articles Based on Integral-Type Strain Sensors), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Potapov, A.I. and Savitskii, G.M., Prochnost’ i deformativnost' stekloplastikov (kontrol' v konstruktsii) (Strength and Deformability of Fiberglass (In Situ Testing)), Leningrad: Stroiizdat, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Potapov, A.I. and Pekker, F.P., Nerazrushayushchii kontrol' konstruktsii iz kompozitsionnykh materialov (Nondestructive Testing of Constructions Made of Composite Materials), Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sborovskii, A.K., Potapov, A.I., and Polyakov, V.E., Ul’trazvukovoi kontrol' kachestva konstruktsii (Ultrasonic Testing of the Quality of Constructions), Leningrad: Sudostroenie, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bessonov, V.G. and Yaroshek, A.D., Nerazrushayushchii kontrol' prochnosti stekloplastikovykh rezervuarov, podvergaemykh vnutrennemu davleniyu (Nondestructive Strength Testing of Fiberglass Vessels Subjected to Internal Pressure), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Potapov, A.I., Petrov, V.A., Nosov, V.V., and Pavlov, I.V., Principles of selection of acoustic-emission indicators of the strength of constructional materials, Defektoskopiya, 1995, no. 5, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Potapov, A.I. and Nosov, V.V., On the selection of an approach to developing NDT methods for the inspection of article strength based on the use of the acoustic-emission phenomenon, Defektoskopiya, 1996, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nosov, V.V., Potapov, A.I., and Burakov, I.N., Estimation of the strength and lifetime of technical objects using the acoustic-emission method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nosov, V.V. and Potapov, A.I., Choosing an approach for developing methods for nondestructive testing of the strength of articles based on the acoustic emission phenomenon, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 1996, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 459–463.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nosov, V.V. and Potapov, A.I., Structural simulation model for acoustic emission parameters, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 1996, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. C. 451–458.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latishenko, V.L., Diagnostika zhestkosti i prochnosti materialov (Diagnostics of Rigidity and Strength of Materials), Riga: Zinatne, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Teagle, P.R., The quality control and nondestructive evaluation of composite aerospace components, Composites, 1983, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Vol. 1, Symp. Held August 2—7, 1981 Univ. Colo. Boulder, Thompson, D.O. and Shimenti, D.E., Eds., New York–London, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prakash, R., Nondestructive testing of composites, Composites, 1980, vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scott, I.G. and Scala, C.M., A review of non-destructive testing of composite materials, NDT Int., 1982, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stinson, M.R. and Champoux, Y., Propagation of sound and the assignment of shape factors in model porous materials having simple pore geometries, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1992, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tourin, A., Derode, A., Peyre, A., and Fink, M., Transport parameters for an ultrasonic pulsed wave propagating in a multiple scattering medium, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2000, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sessarego, J.-P., Sageloli, J., and Guillermin, R., Scattering by an elastic sphere embedded in an elastic isotropic medium, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1998, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 2836–3844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gurevich, B. and Schoenberg, M., Interface conditions for Biot’s equations of poroelasticity, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1999, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 2585–2589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint-Petersburg Mining UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Mozhaysky Military-Space AcademySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations