Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the Cascade Feed Forward Back Propagation network for defect classification in ultrasonic images

  • Acoustic Methods
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD) is now a well established NDE technique finding wide applications in the industry for inspection during manufacture, pre-service and also inservice. While conventionally interpretations of UT images are done by the inspector, a need has always been felt for automated evaluation and interpretation especially when large inspection volumes are involved. Apart from enhancing the speed of inspection, automated evaluation and interpretation provides better reliability of inspection. A number of approaches based on signal analysis coupled with artificial neural networks (ANN) are being tried internationally and limited success has also been obtained. This paper focuses on the development of a semi automatic toolbox for reliable and fast flaw classification in TOFD images using ANN. TOFD images are first acquired and statistical parameters such as mean, standard deviation, energy, skewness and kurtosis are calculated for the region of interest in the images. The classification of the flawed region like Crack, Lack of Fusion, Lack of Penetration, Porosity and Slag Inclusion was materialized using different ANN approaches which made use of these statistical parameters as their input. The process of optimization of a network involves comparison of classification accuracy and the sensitivity of the selected networks. The Cascade Feed Forward Back Propagation (CFBP) network with log sigmoidal activation function proved to be the optimized network model for the data set considered in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cenate, T.C.F., Rani, S.B., Venkatraman, B., and Sangeetha, D.N., Classification of defects in time of flight diffraction (TOFD) images using artificial neural network, Proc. 19th Asia-Pac. Conf. Nondestr. Test. (APCNDT), 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawson, S.W. and Parker, G.A., Automatic detection of defects in industrial ultrasound images using a neural network, Proc. SPIE, 1996, vol. 2786, pp. 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kechida, A., Drai, R., and Guessoum, A., Texture analysis for flaw detection in ultrasonic images, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2012, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. http://www.industrialndt.com/tofd.html.

  5. http://www.mathworks.com.

  6. Veiga, J.L.B.C., de Carvalho, A.A., da Silva, I.C., and Rebello, J.M.A., The use of artificial neural network in the classification of pulse-echo and TOFD ultrasonic signals, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2005, vol. 27, no.4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lahiri, S.K. and Ghanta, K.C., Development of an artificial neural network correlation for prediction of holdup of slurry transport in pipelines, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2008, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1497–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haykin, S., Neural Networks. A Comprehensive Foundation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seyedtabaii, S., Performance evaluation of neural network based pulse-echo weld defect classifiers, Meas. Sci. Rev., 2012, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nandhitha, Manoharan, and Rani, S.B., A comparative study on the performance of the classical wavelet based edge detection for image de-noising in thermographs, Proc. 12th Asia-Pac. Conf. Nondestr. Test. (APCNDT), Auckland, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Valavanis, I. and Kosmopoulos, D., Multiclass defect detection and classification in weld radiographic images using geometric and texture features, Expert Syst. Appl., 2010 doi 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.082

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sahoo, A.K., Yonghong Zhang, and Zuo, M.J., Estimating crack size and location in a steel plate using ultrasonic signals and CFBP neural networks, Proc. Can. Conf. Electr. Comp. Eng. (CCECE), 2008, pp. 1751–1754. doi 10.1109/CCECE.2008.456484410.1109/CCECE.2008.4564844

    Google Scholar 

  13. Badde, D.S., Gupta, A.K., and Patli, V.K., Cascade and feed forward back propagation artificial neural network models for prediction of compressive strength of ready mix concrete, IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng., 2012, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Samanta, S., Mandal, A., and Singh, T.J., Application of ANN in identifying defects in impacted composite, Procedia Mater. Sci., 2014, vol. 6, pp. 926–930. doi 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Artificial_Neural_Networks/Activation_Functions.

  16. Gonzalez, R.C. and Woods, R.E., Digital Image Processing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2007, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Subbaratnam, R., Venkatraman, B., and Raj, B., Time of flight diffraction—an alternative to radiography examination of thick walled stainless steel weldments, Proc. 12th Asia-Pac. Conf. Nondestr. Test. (APCNDT), Auckland, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. F. Theresa Cenate.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Theresa Cenate, C.F., Sheela Rani, B., Ramadevi, R. et al. Optimization of the Cascade Feed Forward Back Propagation network for defect classification in ultrasonic images. Russ J Nondestruct Test 52, 557–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091610003X

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091610003X

Keywords

Navigation